脑室外引流治疗自发性脑出血伴脑室扩张患者不同GCS评分的疗效

{"title":"脑室外引流治疗自发性脑出血伴脑室扩张患者不同GCS评分的疗效","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jcei.04.03.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ICH) is a medical emergency of the highest degree with frequent early neurological\ndeterioration or death. External ventricular drainage (EVD) is the procedure of choice for the treatment of spontaneous\nintracerebral haemorrhage with ventricular extension or blood within the ventricles, acute hydrocephalus and increased\nintracranial pressure in patients of intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) with hydrocephalus and\nits sequelae.\nObjective: The aim and objective of this study was to predict the outcome of pre operative GCS following external ventricular\ndrainage in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage with ventricular extension.\nMethod: In this was prospective observational studies, a total number of 60 cases were taken purposively for a period of July,\n2015- March, 2017 diagnosed by CT scan of brain at Department of Neurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital. All the\npatients, fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled for the study. For assessing outcome of EVD in post operative\npatients and evaluating the efficacy of EVD surgery in follow ups. Glasgow Coma Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale scoring\nmethod for patient assessment were used for outcome of EVD surgery.\nResult: A total of 60 patients were included in this study, age range was 45 to 86 years. Majority patients, 24 (40.0%) were from\n61-70 years of age. The mean age was found 62.0±20. It was observed that 24 (40.00%) patients had GCS 5. GCS 6 was observed\nin 14(23.33%) patients. GCS 5 and 6 were not found post operatively in any cases. GCS 7 was observed in 14 (23.33%) cases.\nWhereas, GCS 8, 9, 10 were found in 11 (18.33%), 13 (21.66%), 10(16.66%) cases respectively and 4 cases were died on first\npost operative day. In most cases GCS level rose to 2 points. GOS at 7th POD died total 12 (20.00%) cases. It was observed\nthat 48 (80.00%) patients were alive Moderate disability existed in 12(25.00%) cases. Again, severe disability and persistent\nvegetative cases observed in 14(29.16%), 9(18.75%) cases. Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months follow up of my study patients,\nit was observed that total died patients 16 (26.66%).\nConclusion: According to my study, majority of the study patients survived following EVD in spontaneous ICH with ventricular\nextension but most cases was unfavorable outcome which was statistically","PeriodicalId":73657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of External Ventricular Drainage in Spontaneous Intracerebral\\nHaemorrhage with Ventricular Extension in different GCS Score\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jcei.04.03.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ICH) is a medical emergency of the highest degree with frequent early neurological\\ndeterioration or death. External ventricular drainage (EVD) is the procedure of choice for the treatment of spontaneous\\nintracerebral haemorrhage with ventricular extension or blood within the ventricles, acute hydrocephalus and increased\\nintracranial pressure in patients of intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) with hydrocephalus and\\nits sequelae.\\nObjective: The aim and objective of this study was to predict the outcome of pre operative GCS following external ventricular\\ndrainage in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage with ventricular extension.\\nMethod: In this was prospective observational studies, a total number of 60 cases were taken purposively for a period of July,\\n2015- March, 2017 diagnosed by CT scan of brain at Department of Neurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital. All the\\npatients, fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled for the study. For assessing outcome of EVD in post operative\\npatients and evaluating the efficacy of EVD surgery in follow ups. Glasgow Coma Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale scoring\\nmethod for patient assessment were used for outcome of EVD surgery.\\nResult: A total of 60 patients were included in this study, age range was 45 to 86 years. Majority patients, 24 (40.0%) were from\\n61-70 years of age. The mean age was found 62.0±20. It was observed that 24 (40.00%) patients had GCS 5. GCS 6 was observed\\nin 14(23.33%) patients. GCS 5 and 6 were not found post operatively in any cases. GCS 7 was observed in 14 (23.33%) cases.\\nWhereas, GCS 8, 9, 10 were found in 11 (18.33%), 13 (21.66%), 10(16.66%) cases respectively and 4 cases were died on first\\npost operative day. In most cases GCS level rose to 2 points. GOS at 7th POD died total 12 (20.00%) cases. It was observed\\nthat 48 (80.00%) patients were alive Moderate disability existed in 12(25.00%) cases. Again, severe disability and persistent\\nvegetative cases observed in 14(29.16%), 9(18.75%) cases. Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months follow up of my study patients,\\nit was observed that total died patients 16 (26.66%).\\nConclusion: According to my study, majority of the study patients survived following EVD in spontaneous ICH with ventricular\\nextension but most cases was unfavorable outcome which was statistically\",\"PeriodicalId\":73657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jcei.04.03.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jcei.04.03.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑出血(ICH)是一种严重程度最高的医学急症,常伴有早期神经系统恶化或死亡。脑室外引流术(EVD)是脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)合并脑积水及其后遗症的自发性脑出血或脑室内出血、急性脑积水和颅内压增高的首选治疗方法。目的:本研究的目的是预测自发性脑出血伴脑室扩张患者行脑室外引流术后术前GCS的预后。方法:选取2015年7月- 2017年3月在达卡医学院附属医院神经外科行颅脑CT扫描诊断的60例患者为前瞻性观察性研究。所有符合纳入和排除标准的患者均被纳入研究。目的:评价EVD术后患者的预后,评价EVD手术的随访效果。EVD手术结果采用格拉斯哥昏迷评分法和格拉斯哥预后评分法进行患者评估。结果:本研究共纳入60例患者,年龄45 ~ 86岁。大多数患者,24例(40.0%)年龄在61-70岁之间。平均年龄62.0±20岁。GCS 5级患者24例(40.00%)。14例(23.33%)患者GCS为6。术后未发现GCS 5、6。GCS 7级14例(23.33%)。GCS 8、9、10分别为11例(18.33%)、13例(21.66%)、10例(16.66%),术后第1天死亡4例。在大多数情况下,GCS水平上升到2分。第7期GOS死亡12例(20.00%)。存活48例(80.00%),存在中度残疾12例(25.00%)。重度残疾和持续植物人分别为14例(29.16%)和9例(18.75%)。格拉斯哥结局量表对我的研究患者随访3个月时,观察到总死亡患者16例(26.66%)。结论:根据我的研究,EVD后自发性脑出血伴脑室扩张的患者绝大多数存活,但多数为不良结局,有统计学意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of External Ventricular Drainage in Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage with Ventricular Extension in different GCS Score
Background: Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ICH) is a medical emergency of the highest degree with frequent early neurological deterioration or death. External ventricular drainage (EVD) is the procedure of choice for the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage with ventricular extension or blood within the ventricles, acute hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure in patients of intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) with hydrocephalus and its sequelae. Objective: The aim and objective of this study was to predict the outcome of pre operative GCS following external ventricular drainage in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage with ventricular extension. Method: In this was prospective observational studies, a total number of 60 cases were taken purposively for a period of July, 2015- March, 2017 diagnosed by CT scan of brain at Department of Neurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital. All the patients, fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled for the study. For assessing outcome of EVD in post operative patients and evaluating the efficacy of EVD surgery in follow ups. Glasgow Coma Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale scoring method for patient assessment were used for outcome of EVD surgery. Result: A total of 60 patients were included in this study, age range was 45 to 86 years. Majority patients, 24 (40.0%) were from 61-70 years of age. The mean age was found 62.0±20. It was observed that 24 (40.00%) patients had GCS 5. GCS 6 was observed in 14(23.33%) patients. GCS 5 and 6 were not found post operatively in any cases. GCS 7 was observed in 14 (23.33%) cases. Whereas, GCS 8, 9, 10 were found in 11 (18.33%), 13 (21.66%), 10(16.66%) cases respectively and 4 cases were died on first post operative day. In most cases GCS level rose to 2 points. GOS at 7th POD died total 12 (20.00%) cases. It was observed that 48 (80.00%) patients were alive Moderate disability existed in 12(25.00%) cases. Again, severe disability and persistent vegetative cases observed in 14(29.16%), 9(18.75%) cases. Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months follow up of my study patients, it was observed that total died patients 16 (26.66%). Conclusion: According to my study, majority of the study patients survived following EVD in spontaneous ICH with ventricular extension but most cases was unfavorable outcome which was statistically
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信