老年人长期护理中以人为本的沟通:范围审查

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
D. Lombard
{"title":"老年人长期护理中以人为本的沟通:范围审查","authors":"D. Lombard","doi":"10.1108/JICA-10-2020-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeInterpersonal skills are increasingly important tools in long-term care with older people, especially against the backdrop of loneliness affecting older people and expectations for a person-centred, joined-up approach. However, the term is used as a composite and its definition lacks shape and focus. In existing literature, participants appear to be selected on the basis of specific illnesses rather than age. Better understanding of the features of everyday communication processes associated with person-centred care can lead to improvements in policy and practice.Design/methodology/approachA scoping review examined communication features associated with person-centred care for older adults. This identified the extent and nature of literature. Several databases were searched; after screening and hand-searching, 31 were included. Findings were analysed for patterns and contradictions, against the objectives of person-centred and integrated care.FindingsEmotional intelligence and the ability to employ various communication styles are crucial skills of person-centred communication. Such approaches can have positive effects on the well-being of older people.Research limitations/implicationsSome studies' validity was weakened by methodological designs being founded on value judgements.Practical implicationsUsing personalised greetings alongside verbal and non-verbal prompts to keep residents emotionally connected during personal care is considered good practice. Stimulating feedback from people using services and their relatives is important.Originality/valueThe role of communication is highlighted in many professional guidance documents on person-centred and integrated care, but the process of implementation is decentralised to individual employers and workers. This paper draws on the findings of contemporary literature, grounded in naturalistic data, with implications for practice and policy.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Person-centred communication in long-term care with older people: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"D. Lombard\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JICA-10-2020-0070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeInterpersonal skills are increasingly important tools in long-term care with older people, especially against the backdrop of loneliness affecting older people and expectations for a person-centred, joined-up approach. However, the term is used as a composite and its definition lacks shape and focus. In existing literature, participants appear to be selected on the basis of specific illnesses rather than age. Better understanding of the features of everyday communication processes associated with person-centred care can lead to improvements in policy and practice.Design/methodology/approachA scoping review examined communication features associated with person-centred care for older adults. This identified the extent and nature of literature. Several databases were searched; after screening and hand-searching, 31 were included. Findings were analysed for patterns and contradictions, against the objectives of person-centred and integrated care.FindingsEmotional intelligence and the ability to employ various communication styles are crucial skills of person-centred communication. Such approaches can have positive effects on the well-being of older people.Research limitations/implicationsSome studies' validity was weakened by methodological designs being founded on value judgements.Practical implicationsUsing personalised greetings alongside verbal and non-verbal prompts to keep residents emotionally connected during personal care is considered good practice. Stimulating feedback from people using services and their relatives is important.Originality/valueThe role of communication is highlighted in many professional guidance documents on person-centred and integrated care, but the process of implementation is decentralised to individual employers and workers. This paper draws on the findings of contemporary literature, grounded in naturalistic data, with implications for practice and policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-10-2020-0070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-10-2020-0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在老年人长期护理中,人际交往能力日益成为重要的工具,尤其是在孤独感影响老年人的背景下,以及人们对以人为本的联合方法的期望。然而,这个术语被用作一个复合词,它的定义缺乏形状和重点。在现有文献中,参与者似乎是根据特定疾病而不是年龄来选择的。更好地了解与以人为本的护理相关的日常沟通过程的特点,可以改善政策和实践。设计/方法/方法范围审查检查了与老年人以人为本护理相关的沟通特征。这就确定了文学的范围和性质。检索了几个数据库;经过筛选和手工检索,31人入选。调查结果分析模式和矛盾,反对以人为本和综合护理的目标。情商和运用各种沟通方式的能力是以人为本的沟通的关键技能。这些方法可以对老年人的福祉产生积极影响。研究的局限性/启示一些研究的有效性被建立在价值判断上的方法设计削弱了。在个人护理过程中,使用个性化的问候以及语言和非语言提示来保持居民的情感联系被认为是一种良好的做法。从使用服务的人及其亲属那里获得反馈很重要。在许多以人为本和综合护理的专业指导文件中强调了沟通的作用,但实施过程分散到个别雇主和工人身上。本文借鉴了当代文献的发现,以自然主义数据为基础,对实践和政策有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Person-centred communication in long-term care with older people: a scoping review
PurposeInterpersonal skills are increasingly important tools in long-term care with older people, especially against the backdrop of loneliness affecting older people and expectations for a person-centred, joined-up approach. However, the term is used as a composite and its definition lacks shape and focus. In existing literature, participants appear to be selected on the basis of specific illnesses rather than age. Better understanding of the features of everyday communication processes associated with person-centred care can lead to improvements in policy and practice.Design/methodology/approachA scoping review examined communication features associated with person-centred care for older adults. This identified the extent and nature of literature. Several databases were searched; after screening and hand-searching, 31 were included. Findings were analysed for patterns and contradictions, against the objectives of person-centred and integrated care.FindingsEmotional intelligence and the ability to employ various communication styles are crucial skills of person-centred communication. Such approaches can have positive effects on the well-being of older people.Research limitations/implicationsSome studies' validity was weakened by methodological designs being founded on value judgements.Practical implicationsUsing personalised greetings alongside verbal and non-verbal prompts to keep residents emotionally connected during personal care is considered good practice. Stimulating feedback from people using services and their relatives is important.Originality/valueThe role of communication is highlighted in many professional guidance documents on person-centred and integrated care, but the process of implementation is decentralised to individual employers and workers. This paper draws on the findings of contemporary literature, grounded in naturalistic data, with implications for practice and policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信