制定先前学习评估的基准:护士教育案例

M. Day
{"title":"制定先前学习评估的基准:护士教育案例","authors":"M. Day","doi":"10.19030/AJHS.V3I1.6757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report discusses the results of a benchmarking study that examined how prior learning assessment (PLA) is conducted within UK nursing faculty and discusses how this might impact on the career of the PLA practitioner. A screening survey was administered to 66 UK Schools of Nursing. This initial survey identified a cohort of 22 experts and 12 novices from 34 Schools of Nursing who were actively involved in the practice of PLA. This cohort was subjected to a benchmarking survey to determine whether their practice complied, or did not comply, with international benchmarks for PLA. Respondents were asked to justify their responses by making additional written comments. These comments were further explored using focus group and depth interviews in order to identify emergent themes and categories, which were then subjected to analysis using modified grounded theory. This enabled the researcher to identify factors influencing PLA practice and how these might shape the career of the PLA practitioner. Methods of assessment were also identified - when optimal resources are available, the PLA practitioner usually adopts an assessment method that is based on the individual needs of learners, rather than the administrative requirements of the institution. These methods are holistic. They are also inclusive, rather than exclusive, or specific to, a competency or developmental approach to PLA. Finally, the importance of \"bottom up\" rather than \"top down\" or institutional approaches is justified as a mechanism for PLA policy development and the importance of emerging benchmarks in supporting the career life cycle of the PLA practitioner is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":89884,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health sciences","volume":"37 1","pages":"83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Benchmarks For Prior Learning Assessment: The Case For Nurse Education\",\"authors\":\"M. Day\",\"doi\":\"10.19030/AJHS.V3I1.6757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report discusses the results of a benchmarking study that examined how prior learning assessment (PLA) is conducted within UK nursing faculty and discusses how this might impact on the career of the PLA practitioner. A screening survey was administered to 66 UK Schools of Nursing. This initial survey identified a cohort of 22 experts and 12 novices from 34 Schools of Nursing who were actively involved in the practice of PLA. This cohort was subjected to a benchmarking survey to determine whether their practice complied, or did not comply, with international benchmarks for PLA. Respondents were asked to justify their responses by making additional written comments. These comments were further explored using focus group and depth interviews in order to identify emergent themes and categories, which were then subjected to analysis using modified grounded theory. This enabled the researcher to identify factors influencing PLA practice and how these might shape the career of the PLA practitioner. Methods of assessment were also identified - when optimal resources are available, the PLA practitioner usually adopts an assessment method that is based on the individual needs of learners, rather than the administrative requirements of the institution. These methods are holistic. They are also inclusive, rather than exclusive, or specific to, a competency or developmental approach to PLA. Finally, the importance of \\\"bottom up\\\" rather than \\\"top down\\\" or institutional approaches is justified as a mechanism for PLA policy development and the importance of emerging benchmarks in supporting the career life cycle of the PLA practitioner is also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of health sciences\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"83-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJHS.V3I1.6757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJHS.V3I1.6757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本报告讨论了一项基准研究的结果,该研究检查了英国护理学院如何进行先前学习评估(PLA),并讨论了这可能对PLA从业者的职业生涯产生的影响。对66所英国护理学院进行了筛选调查。这项初步调查确定了来自34所护理学院的22名专家和12名新手,他们积极参与了解放军的实践。这群人受到基准调查,以确定他们的做法是否符合,或不符合,国际基准解放军。受访者被要求通过提供额外的书面评论来证明他们的回答是正确的。这些评论通过焦点小组和深度访谈进一步探讨,以确定紧急主题和类别,然后使用修正的扎根理论进行分析。这使研究人员能够确定影响解放军实践的因素,以及这些因素如何塑造解放军从业者的职业生涯。评估方法也被确定——当有最佳资源可用时,解放军从业者通常采用基于学习者个人需求的评估方法,而不是基于机构的行政要求。这些方法是整体性的。它们也是包容性的,而不是排他性的,或特定于解放军的能力或发展方法。最后,“自下而上”而不是“自上而下”或制度方法的重要性被证明是解放军政策制定的一种机制,并讨论了新兴基准在支持解放军从业者职业生命周期中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing Benchmarks For Prior Learning Assessment: The Case For Nurse Education
This report discusses the results of a benchmarking study that examined how prior learning assessment (PLA) is conducted within UK nursing faculty and discusses how this might impact on the career of the PLA practitioner. A screening survey was administered to 66 UK Schools of Nursing. This initial survey identified a cohort of 22 experts and 12 novices from 34 Schools of Nursing who were actively involved in the practice of PLA. This cohort was subjected to a benchmarking survey to determine whether their practice complied, or did not comply, with international benchmarks for PLA. Respondents were asked to justify their responses by making additional written comments. These comments were further explored using focus group and depth interviews in order to identify emergent themes and categories, which were then subjected to analysis using modified grounded theory. This enabled the researcher to identify factors influencing PLA practice and how these might shape the career of the PLA practitioner. Methods of assessment were also identified - when optimal resources are available, the PLA practitioner usually adopts an assessment method that is based on the individual needs of learners, rather than the administrative requirements of the institution. These methods are holistic. They are also inclusive, rather than exclusive, or specific to, a competency or developmental approach to PLA. Finally, the importance of "bottom up" rather than "top down" or institutional approaches is justified as a mechanism for PLA policy development and the importance of emerging benchmarks in supporting the career life cycle of the PLA practitioner is also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信