对斗式排序进行了详细的实验分析

Neetu Faujdar, Shipra Saraswat
{"title":"对斗式排序进行了详细的实验分析","authors":"Neetu Faujdar, Shipra Saraswat","doi":"10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bucket sort is a non-comparison sorting algorithm in which elements are scattered over the buckets. We have concluded, based on state-of-art that most of the researchers have been using the insertion sort within buckets. The other sorting technique is also used in many papers over the buckets. From the state-of-art of bucket sort, we have analyzed that insertion sort is preferable in case of low volume of data to be sorted. In this work, authors have used the merge, count and insertion sort separately over the buckets and the results are compared with each other. The sorting benchmark has been used to test the algorithms. For testing the algorithms, sorting benchmark has been used. We have defined the threshold (τ) defined the threshold for saving the time and space of the algorithms. Results indicate that, count sort comes out to be more efficient within the buckets for every type of dataset.","PeriodicalId":6651,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The detailed experimental analysis of bucket sort\",\"authors\":\"Neetu Faujdar, Shipra Saraswat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The bucket sort is a non-comparison sorting algorithm in which elements are scattered over the buckets. We have concluded, based on state-of-art that most of the researchers have been using the insertion sort within buckets. The other sorting technique is also used in many papers over the buckets. From the state-of-art of bucket sort, we have analyzed that insertion sort is preferable in case of low volume of data to be sorted. In this work, authors have used the merge, count and insertion sort separately over the buckets and the results are compared with each other. The sorting benchmark has been used to test the algorithms. For testing the algorithms, sorting benchmark has been used. We have defined the threshold (τ) defined the threshold for saving the time and space of the algorithms. Results indicate that, count sort comes out to be more efficient within the buckets for every type of dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering - Confluence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

桶排序是一种非比较排序算法,其中元素分散在桶中。根据目前的技术水平,我们得出的结论是,大多数研究人员一直在使用桶内插入排序。另一种分类技术也被用在许多纸桶上。从桶排序的现状来看,我们已经分析了插入排序在要排序的数据量小的情况下更可取。在这项工作中,作者分别对桶进行了合并、计数和插入排序,并对结果进行了比较。排序基准已经被用来测试算法。为了测试算法,使用了排序基准。为了节省算法的时间和空间,我们定义了阈值(τ)。结果表明,对于每种类型的数据集,计数排序在桶中更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The detailed experimental analysis of bucket sort
The bucket sort is a non-comparison sorting algorithm in which elements are scattered over the buckets. We have concluded, based on state-of-art that most of the researchers have been using the insertion sort within buckets. The other sorting technique is also used in many papers over the buckets. From the state-of-art of bucket sort, we have analyzed that insertion sort is preferable in case of low volume of data to be sorted. In this work, authors have used the merge, count and insertion sort separately over the buckets and the results are compared with each other. The sorting benchmark has been used to test the algorithms. For testing the algorithms, sorting benchmark has been used. We have defined the threshold (τ) defined the threshold for saving the time and space of the algorithms. Results indicate that, count sort comes out to be more efficient within the buckets for every type of dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信