扩展景深重建中焦点度量的评价

Jose N. Filipe, Luis M. N. Tavora, P. Assunção, R. Fonseca-Pinto, S. Faria
{"title":"扩展景深重建中焦点度量的评价","authors":"Jose N. Filipe, Luis M. N. Tavora, P. Assunção, R. Fonseca-Pinto, S. Faria","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of focus metrics in the evaluation of refocused images from light fields is investigated in this paper. To this aim, the paper presents a comprehensive study on the performance of a large set of different focus metrics (34 in total) in the evaluation of patch-based extended depth-of-field reconstructed images (e.g., all-in-focus). The new findings of this work demonstrate that optimal reconstruction of extended depth-of-field images, from light fields captured with focused plenoptic cameras, is not consistent with the focus level figures computed by available focus metrics. The results show that a higher focus level, as given by such computational methods, does not actually correspond to better all-in-focus images, thus indicating that currently available focus metrics are not suitable for evaluating the quality of extended depth-of-field reconstruction. The results obtained through subjective evaluation confirm that objective focus metrics fail to indicate the best focused images. Finally, the paper presents recommendations to adapt existing metrics to extended depth-of-field reconstruction in plenoptic imaging.","PeriodicalId":6618,"journal":{"name":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"33 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Focus Metrics in Extended Depth-of-field Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Jose N. Filipe, Luis M. N. Tavora, P. Assunção, R. Fonseca-Pinto, S. Faria\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of focus metrics in the evaluation of refocused images from light fields is investigated in this paper. To this aim, the paper presents a comprehensive study on the performance of a large set of different focus metrics (34 in total) in the evaluation of patch-based extended depth-of-field reconstructed images (e.g., all-in-focus). The new findings of this work demonstrate that optimal reconstruction of extended depth-of-field images, from light fields captured with focused plenoptic cameras, is not consistent with the focus level figures computed by available focus metrics. The results show that a higher focus level, as given by such computational methods, does not actually correspond to better all-in-focus images, thus indicating that currently available focus metrics are not suitable for evaluating the quality of extended depth-of-field reconstruction. The results obtained through subjective evaluation confirm that objective focus metrics fail to indicate the best focused images. Finally, the paper presents recommendations to adapt existing metrics to extended depth-of-field reconstruction in plenoptic imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了焦点度量在光场重聚焦图像评价中的性能。为此,本文对基于patch的扩展景深重建图像(如全焦)的评价中大量不同焦点度量(共34个)的性能进行了全面研究。这项工作的新发现表明,从聚焦全光学相机捕获的光场中获得的扩展景深图像的最佳重建与可用焦点度量计算的焦点水平数字不一致。结果表明,这些计算方法给出的更高的焦距水平实际上并不对应于更好的全焦图像,这表明目前可用的焦距指标并不适合用于评估扩展景深重建的质量。通过主观评价得到的结果证实,客观的焦距指标不能表明最佳聚焦图像。最后,本文提出了一些建议,以适应现有的指标,以扩大在全光学成像的景深重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Focus Metrics in Extended Depth-of-field Reconstruction
The performance of focus metrics in the evaluation of refocused images from light fields is investigated in this paper. To this aim, the paper presents a comprehensive study on the performance of a large set of different focus metrics (34 in total) in the evaluation of patch-based extended depth-of-field reconstructed images (e.g., all-in-focus). The new findings of this work demonstrate that optimal reconstruction of extended depth-of-field images, from light fields captured with focused plenoptic cameras, is not consistent with the focus level figures computed by available focus metrics. The results show that a higher focus level, as given by such computational methods, does not actually correspond to better all-in-focus images, thus indicating that currently available focus metrics are not suitable for evaluating the quality of extended depth-of-field reconstruction. The results obtained through subjective evaluation confirm that objective focus metrics fail to indicate the best focused images. Finally, the paper presents recommendations to adapt existing metrics to extended depth-of-field reconstruction in plenoptic imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信