{"title":"SmartDR","authors":"S. Goncalves, L. S. D. Rosa Jr., F. S. Marques","doi":"10.1145/3417133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detailed routing is one of the most time-consuming steps of physical synthesis of integrated circuits. Also, it is very challenging due to the complexity of the design rules that the router must obey. In this article, we present SmartDR, a detailed routing system that focuses on good design rule handling and fast runtime. To attend these objectives, we propose a novel pin access approach and a fast design rule aware A*-interval-based path search algorithm. The pin access method uses resource sharing ghost pin access paths with dynamic legalization check. We also propose a design rule check algorithm to detect thick metal shapes that are widely created using the proposed pin access method. The path search algorithm integrates design rule check on its core, handling many design rules that would not be possible to be solved by postprocessing. It is aware of the minimum area rule, the cut spacing of via cuts within the same path, and the via library. We also present a new technique to improve A*-based path search in detailed routing. The technique makes the path search algorithm aware of the global routing guides, accelerating the search. Using ISPD 2018 Contest benchmarks, our experiments show that our router is superior to the state-of-the-art routers that were also tested using the same benchmarks. Our router has presented, on average, 77.6% less runtime, 73.5% less design rule violations, with respect to Dr. CU 2.0, which is the better of the compared routers.","PeriodicalId":6933,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)","volume":"111 1","pages":"1 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3417133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
详细布线是集成电路物理合成中最耗时的步骤之一。此外,由于路由器必须遵守的设计规则的复杂性,这是非常有挑战性的。在本文中,我们介绍了SmartDR,这是一个详细的路由系统,专注于良好的设计规则处理和快速运行。为了实现这些目标,我们提出了一种新的引脚访问方法和一种快速设计规则感知的基于a *区间的路径搜索算法。引脚访问方法采用资源共享的幽灵引脚访问路径,并进行动态合法性检查。我们还提出了一种设计规则检查算法,以检测使用所提出的引脚访问方法广泛创建的厚金属形状。路径搜索算法以设计规则检查为核心,处理了许多后处理无法解决的设计规则。它知道最小面积规则,在同一路径内通过切割的切割间距,以及通过库。提出了一种改进基于a *的详细路由路径搜索的新技术。该技术使路径搜索算法能够感知全局路由指南,从而加快了搜索速度。使用ISPD 2018竞赛基准测试,我们的实验表明,我们的路由器优于使用相同基准测试的最先进的路由器。与Dr. CU 2.0相比,我们的路由器平均运行时间减少了77.6%,违反设计规则的次数减少了73.5%,是比较好的路由器。
Detailed routing is one of the most time-consuming steps of physical synthesis of integrated circuits. Also, it is very challenging due to the complexity of the design rules that the router must obey. In this article, we present SmartDR, a detailed routing system that focuses on good design rule handling and fast runtime. To attend these objectives, we propose a novel pin access approach and a fast design rule aware A*-interval-based path search algorithm. The pin access method uses resource sharing ghost pin access paths with dynamic legalization check. We also propose a design rule check algorithm to detect thick metal shapes that are widely created using the proposed pin access method. The path search algorithm integrates design rule check on its core, handling many design rules that would not be possible to be solved by postprocessing. It is aware of the minimum area rule, the cut spacing of via cuts within the same path, and the via library. We also present a new technique to improve A*-based path search in detailed routing. The technique makes the path search algorithm aware of the global routing guides, accelerating the search. Using ISPD 2018 Contest benchmarks, our experiments show that our router is superior to the state-of-the-art routers that were also tested using the same benchmarks. Our router has presented, on average, 77.6% less runtime, 73.5% less design rule violations, with respect to Dr. CU 2.0, which is the better of the compared routers.