{"title":"布鲁塞尔规则与-à-vis国家执法法律提供的法律救济的关系","authors":"Damjan Orož","doi":"10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.149-160.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article discuss the impact of the Brussels I and Brussels I bis Regulations on Slovenian enforcement proceedings. The aim of the Brussels I bis Regulation is to ensure creditors a simpler but mostly quicker access to enforcement in case a judgment must be enforced in a state other than the Member State of origin. The new regulatory framework will certainly facilitate quicker access to enforcement for creditors. However, this can only be ensured categorically in the first phase of enforcement, i.e. the seizure of assets (distraint). In subsequent enforcement phases successful enforcement in favour of the creditor could be stayed if the debtor decides to enforce grounds used to challenge the enforceability of a foreign judgment. A major distinction is that the control of enforceability will only proceed if and when the debtor so requests. Razmerje med Uredbo Bruselj I in pravnimi sredstvi, ki jih predvidevajo nacionalne ureditve izvrsilnega prava Prispevek obravnava vpliv Uredb BU I in BU I bis na slovenski izvrsilni postopek. Namen BU I bis je upniku zagotoviti lažji, predvsem pa hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe v primeru, da je treba sodbo izvrsiti v drugi državi kot v državi izvora. Gotovo bo nova ureditev upniku zagotovila hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe, vendar to lahko kategoricno zagotovimo le za prvo fazo izvrsbe, to je rubež premoženja. V kasnejsih fazah izvrsitve pa se utegne upniku uspesna izvrsba odložiti, ce se dolžnik odloci uveljavljati razloge, s katerimi bo nasprotoval izvrsljivosti tuje sodne odlocbe. Pomembna razlika je ta, da se bo kontrola izvrsljivosti opravila le ko in ce bo dolžnik to zahteval.","PeriodicalId":40392,"journal":{"name":"Lexonomica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship of the Brussels I Regulation vis-à-vis Legal Remedies Provided by National Enforcement Laws\",\"authors\":\"Damjan Orož\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.149-160.2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article discuss the impact of the Brussels I and Brussels I bis Regulations on Slovenian enforcement proceedings. The aim of the Brussels I bis Regulation is to ensure creditors a simpler but mostly quicker access to enforcement in case a judgment must be enforced in a state other than the Member State of origin. The new regulatory framework will certainly facilitate quicker access to enforcement for creditors. However, this can only be ensured categorically in the first phase of enforcement, i.e. the seizure of assets (distraint). In subsequent enforcement phases successful enforcement in favour of the creditor could be stayed if the debtor decides to enforce grounds used to challenge the enforceability of a foreign judgment. A major distinction is that the control of enforceability will only proceed if and when the debtor so requests. Razmerje med Uredbo Bruselj I in pravnimi sredstvi, ki jih predvidevajo nacionalne ureditve izvrsilnega prava Prispevek obravnava vpliv Uredb BU I in BU I bis na slovenski izvrsilni postopek. Namen BU I bis je upniku zagotoviti lažji, predvsem pa hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe v primeru, da je treba sodbo izvrsiti v drugi državi kot v državi izvora. Gotovo bo nova ureditev upniku zagotovila hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe, vendar to lahko kategoricno zagotovimo le za prvo fazo izvrsbe, to je rubež premoženja. V kasnejsih fazah izvrsitve pa se utegne upniku uspesna izvrsba odložiti, ce se dolžnik odloci uveljavljati razloge, s katerimi bo nasprotoval izvrsljivosti tuje sodne odlocbe. Pomembna razlika je ta, da se bo kontrola izvrsljivosti opravila le ko in ce bo dolžnik to zahteval.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lexonomica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lexonomica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.149-160.2018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexonomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.149-160.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文章讨论了《布鲁塞尔1号条例》和《布鲁塞尔2号条例》对斯洛文尼亚执行程序的影响。《布鲁塞尔条例》的目的是确保债权人在判决必须在原籍成员国以外的国家执行时,能够更简单但更迅速地获得执行。新的监管框架肯定会促进债权人更快地获得强制执行。但是,只有在执行的第一阶段,即扣押资产(扣押),才能明确确保这一点。在随后的执行阶段,如果债务人决定执行用来质疑外国判决可执行性的理由,则有利于债权人的成功执行可能会被中止。一个主要的区别是,对可执行性的控制只有在债务人请求时才会进行。Razmerje med urdbo Bruselj I in pravnimi sredstvi, ki jih predevajo nacalalne urvrsilnega prava pripevek obravnava vpliv Uredb BU I in BU I is na slovenski izvrsilni postopek。Namen BU I is je upniku zagotoviti lažji, predvsem pa hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe v primeru, da je treba sodbo izvrsiti v druggi državi kot v državi izvora。Gotovo bo nova ureditev upniku zagotovila hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe, vendar to lahko categororicno zagotovimo le za provo fazo izvrsbe, to je rubejipremoženja。V kasnejsih fazah izvrsitve pa se utene upniku uspesna izvrsba odložiti, ce se dolžnik odloci uveljavljati razloge, s katerimi bo nasprotoval izvrsljivosti tuje sotene odlobe。Pomembna razlika je ta, da se bo kontrola izvrsljivosti opravila le ko in ce bo dolžnik to zahteval。
Relationship of the Brussels I Regulation vis-à-vis Legal Remedies Provided by National Enforcement Laws
Article discuss the impact of the Brussels I and Brussels I bis Regulations on Slovenian enforcement proceedings. The aim of the Brussels I bis Regulation is to ensure creditors a simpler but mostly quicker access to enforcement in case a judgment must be enforced in a state other than the Member State of origin. The new regulatory framework will certainly facilitate quicker access to enforcement for creditors. However, this can only be ensured categorically in the first phase of enforcement, i.e. the seizure of assets (distraint). In subsequent enforcement phases successful enforcement in favour of the creditor could be stayed if the debtor decides to enforce grounds used to challenge the enforceability of a foreign judgment. A major distinction is that the control of enforceability will only proceed if and when the debtor so requests. Razmerje med Uredbo Bruselj I in pravnimi sredstvi, ki jih predvidevajo nacionalne ureditve izvrsilnega prava Prispevek obravnava vpliv Uredb BU I in BU I bis na slovenski izvrsilni postopek. Namen BU I bis je upniku zagotoviti lažji, predvsem pa hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe v primeru, da je treba sodbo izvrsiti v drugi državi kot v državi izvora. Gotovo bo nova ureditev upniku zagotovila hitrejsi dostop do izvrsbe, vendar to lahko kategoricno zagotovimo le za prvo fazo izvrsbe, to je rubež premoženja. V kasnejsih fazah izvrsitve pa se utegne upniku uspesna izvrsba odložiti, ce se dolžnik odloci uveljavljati razloge, s katerimi bo nasprotoval izvrsljivosti tuje sodne odlocbe. Pomembna razlika je ta, da se bo kontrola izvrsljivosti opravila le ko in ce bo dolžnik to zahteval.