作业车间调度的约束规划与元启发式比较分析

M. Gregor, M. Hruboš, Dušan Nemec
{"title":"作业车间调度的约束规划与元启发式比较分析","authors":"M. Gregor, M. Hruboš, Dušan Nemec","doi":"10.1109/CYBERI.2018.8337536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers two kinds of optimization methods: constraint programming and metaheuristic search. It shows how each of the approaches can be applied to multiple instances of the job shop scheduling problem and compares the performance of these approaches among themselves and also under various parameter settings. It is shown that, given the instances of the problem and the parameter configurations considered in the paper, constraint programming clearly outperforms the other approaches. In its final section, the paper outlines further conclusions as well as suggestions for future work.","PeriodicalId":6534,"journal":{"name":"2018 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I)","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of constraint programming and metaheuristics for job-shop scheduling\",\"authors\":\"M. Gregor, M. Hruboš, Dušan Nemec\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CYBERI.2018.8337536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper considers two kinds of optimization methods: constraint programming and metaheuristic search. It shows how each of the approaches can be applied to multiple instances of the job shop scheduling problem and compares the performance of these approaches among themselves and also under various parameter settings. It is shown that, given the instances of the problem and the parameter configurations considered in the paper, constraint programming clearly outperforms the other approaches. In its final section, the paper outlines further conclusions as well as suggestions for future work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERI.2018.8337536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERI.2018.8337536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考虑了约束规划和元启发式搜索两种优化方法。它展示了如何将每种方法应用于作业车间调度问题的多个实例,并比较了这些方法之间以及在不同参数设置下的性能。结果表明,给定问题的实例和本文所考虑的参数配置,约束规划明显优于其他方法。在最后一节,本文概述了进一步的结论以及对未来工作的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of constraint programming and metaheuristics for job-shop scheduling
The paper considers two kinds of optimization methods: constraint programming and metaheuristic search. It shows how each of the approaches can be applied to multiple instances of the job shop scheduling problem and compares the performance of these approaches among themselves and also under various parameter settings. It is shown that, given the instances of the problem and the parameter configurations considered in the paper, constraint programming clearly outperforms the other approaches. In its final section, the paper outlines further conclusions as well as suggestions for future work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信