模糊条件下分布式团队信息处理模型

R. Mallubhatla, K. Pattipati, D. Kleinman, Zhuang-Bo Tang
{"title":"模糊条件下分布式团队信息处理模型","authors":"R. Mallubhatla, K. Pattipati, D. Kleinman, Zhuang-Bo Tang","doi":"10.1109/ICSMC.1989.71386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed information processing by a three-person team operating in a binary hypothesis-testing environment is considered. The team is hierarchical, with a primary decision-maker (DM0) and two subordinate DMs (DM1 and DM2). Given a set of measurements, the team has to decide whether a contact is a threat or a neutral. The subordinates are experts, one at detecting threats and the other at detecting neutrals. The team has access to noisy measurements from three sensors; one global, shared by all three DMs, and two local, dedicated to each of the two subordinates. The primary DM makes the final team decision based on the reports of the subordinates and the global measurement, and attaches a confidence level to the decision. A normative model for the distributed detection process is developed. The normative predictions are compared with the experimental data to identify cognitive biases of human DMs. A normative-descriptive model that accounts for these biases is developed, and is shown to provide an excellent match with the experimental data.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":72691,"journal":{"name":"Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics","volume":"2007 1","pages":"706-712 vol.2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model of distributed team information processing under ambiguity\",\"authors\":\"R. Mallubhatla, K. Pattipati, D. Kleinman, Zhuang-Bo Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSMC.1989.71386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Distributed information processing by a three-person team operating in a binary hypothesis-testing environment is considered. The team is hierarchical, with a primary decision-maker (DM0) and two subordinate DMs (DM1 and DM2). Given a set of measurements, the team has to decide whether a contact is a threat or a neutral. The subordinates are experts, one at detecting threats and the other at detecting neutrals. The team has access to noisy measurements from three sensors; one global, shared by all three DMs, and two local, dedicated to each of the two subordinates. The primary DM makes the final team decision based on the reports of the subordinates and the global measurement, and attaches a confidence level to the decision. A normative model for the distributed detection process is developed. The normative predictions are compared with the experimental data to identify cognitive biases of human DMs. A normative-descriptive model that accounts for these biases is developed, and is shown to provide an excellent match with the experimental data.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics\",\"volume\":\"2007 1\",\"pages\":\"706-712 vol.2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1989.71386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1989.71386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

考虑了在二元假设检验环境中由三人团队操作的分布式信息处理。这个团队是分层的,有一个主要的决策者(DM0)和两个下级的决策者(DM1和DM2)。给定一组测量值,团队必须决定一个接触者是威胁还是中立。下属是专家,一个善于发现威胁,另一个善于发现中立。该团队可以从三个传感器获得噪声测量;一个全球的,由所有三个dm共享,两个本地的,分别献给两个下属。主DM根据下属的报告和全局测量做出最终的团队决策,并为决策附加一个置信度。建立了分布式检测过程的规范模型。将规范性预测与实验数据进行比较,以确定人类dm的认知偏差。一种解释这些偏差的规范描述模型被开发出来,并被证明与实验数据非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A model of distributed team information processing under ambiguity
Distributed information processing by a three-person team operating in a binary hypothesis-testing environment is considered. The team is hierarchical, with a primary decision-maker (DM0) and two subordinate DMs (DM1 and DM2). Given a set of measurements, the team has to decide whether a contact is a threat or a neutral. The subordinates are experts, one at detecting threats and the other at detecting neutrals. The team has access to noisy measurements from three sensors; one global, shared by all three DMs, and two local, dedicated to each of the two subordinates. The primary DM makes the final team decision based on the reports of the subordinates and the global measurement, and attaches a confidence level to the decision. A normative model for the distributed detection process is developed. The normative predictions are compared with the experimental data to identify cognitive biases of human DMs. A normative-descriptive model that accounts for these biases is developed, and is shown to provide an excellent match with the experimental data.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信