云网络中的后量子QUIC协议

Manohar Raavi, Simeon Wuthier, Xiaobo Zhou, Sang-Yoon Chang
{"title":"云网络中的后量子QUIC协议","authors":"Manohar Raavi, Simeon Wuthier, Xiaobo Zhou, Sang-Yoon Chang","doi":"10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-quantum ciphers (PQC) secure the digital networking of the current computers against a quantum-computing-equipped adversary. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) selected post-quantum digital signature algorithms for standardization. To prepare for the transition to PQC, we study the feasibility of integrating the NIST-standardized PQC digital signatures into the existing networking protocols, which include TCP/TLS and the more advanced QUIC. We study the behavior and performances of implementing PQC signatures for HTTP networking built on TCP/TLS and QUIC. Our experiment-based studies use remote cloud servers across the globe to simulate and measure the real-world networking behaviors. Focusing on the post-quantum lattice-based ciphers of Dilithium and Falcon, our results show that QUIC generally outperforms TCP/TLS (by 52% with RSA, 2.5% or greater with Dilithium algorithms, and 32.8 % or greater with Falcon algorithms). Based on the QUIC performances and the protocol handshake duration overhead between the client and the cloud server, we recommend Falcon for the QUIC-based networking applications for quicker handshake and less variance if the devices can afford the hardware for floating-point-based operations.","PeriodicalId":65870,"journal":{"name":"公共管理高层论坛","volume":"118 1","pages":"573-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Quantum QUIC Protocol in Cloud Networking\",\"authors\":\"Manohar Raavi, Simeon Wuthier, Xiaobo Zhou, Sang-Yoon Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Post-quantum ciphers (PQC) secure the digital networking of the current computers against a quantum-computing-equipped adversary. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) selected post-quantum digital signature algorithms for standardization. To prepare for the transition to PQC, we study the feasibility of integrating the NIST-standardized PQC digital signatures into the existing networking protocols, which include TCP/TLS and the more advanced QUIC. We study the behavior and performances of implementing PQC signatures for HTTP networking built on TCP/TLS and QUIC. Our experiment-based studies use remote cloud servers across the globe to simulate and measure the real-world networking behaviors. Focusing on the post-quantum lattice-based ciphers of Dilithium and Falcon, our results show that QUIC generally outperforms TCP/TLS (by 52% with RSA, 2.5% or greater with Dilithium algorithms, and 32.8 % or greater with Falcon algorithms). Based on the QUIC performances and the protocol handshake duration overhead between the client and the cloud server, we recommend Falcon for the QUIC-based networking applications for quicker handshake and less variance if the devices can afford the hardware for floating-point-based operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":65870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"公共管理高层论坛\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"573-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"公共管理高层论坛\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"公共管理高层论坛","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后量子密码(PQC)保护当前计算机的数字网络免受量子计算对手的攻击。美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)选择了后量子数字签名算法进行标准化。为了准备向PQC过渡,我们研究了将nist标准化的PQC数字签名集成到现有网络协议(包括TCP/TLS和更先进的QUIC)中的可行性。研究了基于TCP/TLS和QUIC的HTTP网络中实现PQC签名的行为和性能。我们基于实验的研究使用全球的远程云服务器来模拟和测量现实世界的网络行为。通过研究Dilithium和Falcon的后量子格密码,我们的结果表明QUIC通常优于TCP/TLS(使用RSA算法优于52%,使用Dilithium算法优于2.5%或更高,使用Falcon算法优于32.8%或更高)。基于QUIC性能和客户端和云服务器之间的协议握手持续时间开销,如果设备能够负担得起基于浮点数的操作的硬件,我们建议将Falcon用于基于QUIC的网络应用程序,以实现更快的握手和更少的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Quantum QUIC Protocol in Cloud Networking
Post-quantum ciphers (PQC) secure the digital networking of the current computers against a quantum-computing-equipped adversary. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) selected post-quantum digital signature algorithms for standardization. To prepare for the transition to PQC, we study the feasibility of integrating the NIST-standardized PQC digital signatures into the existing networking protocols, which include TCP/TLS and the more advanced QUIC. We study the behavior and performances of implementing PQC signatures for HTTP networking built on TCP/TLS and QUIC. Our experiment-based studies use remote cloud servers across the globe to simulate and measure the real-world networking behaviors. Focusing on the post-quantum lattice-based ciphers of Dilithium and Falcon, our results show that QUIC generally outperforms TCP/TLS (by 52% with RSA, 2.5% or greater with Dilithium algorithms, and 32.8 % or greater with Falcon algorithms). Based on the QUIC performances and the protocol handshake duration overhead between the client and the cloud server, we recommend Falcon for the QUIC-based networking applications for quicker handshake and less variance if the devices can afford the hardware for floating-point-based operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信