{"title":"评估海洋环境中大气腐蚀的实验设计考虑:替代C1010钢","authors":"Christine E. Sanders, R. Santucci","doi":"10.3390/cmd4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rigorous assessment of marine atmospheric corrosion at a controlled NRL test site in Key West Florida was conducted. Certain factors which have been previously implicated in the literature as influencing the corrosion of engineering materials in atmospheric exposure were isolated and explored. In particular, the effect of sample size and orientation was explored. Low carbon steel (C1010) witness coupons were exposed in vertical non-sheltered, vertical sheltered, and tilted non-sheltered conditions. The effect of surface area on measured steel mass loss was also explored to identify the veracity of the so-called “edge effect”. Efforts were made to correlate meteorological atmospheric conditions (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, wind direction, etc.) to the monthly assessment of corrosion damage. Results were assessed in terms of steel mass loss. Additive composite monthly corrosion damage tended to significantly overshoot the observed cumulative corrosion damage for samples exposed over the same period. This observation, among others presented herein, suggests that exposure of samples for less than 6 months is not an adequate predictor of long-term, natural exposure. Additionally, a smaller sample had a larger area-normalized mass loss than a larger sample. The influence of the sample edge (especially the bottom edge) was implicated in causing this difference.","PeriodicalId":10693,"journal":{"name":"Corrosion and Materials Degradation","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Design Considerations for Assessing Atmospheric Corrosion in a Marine Environment: Surrogate C1010 Steel\",\"authors\":\"Christine E. Sanders, R. Santucci\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cmd4010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A rigorous assessment of marine atmospheric corrosion at a controlled NRL test site in Key West Florida was conducted. Certain factors which have been previously implicated in the literature as influencing the corrosion of engineering materials in atmospheric exposure were isolated and explored. In particular, the effect of sample size and orientation was explored. Low carbon steel (C1010) witness coupons were exposed in vertical non-sheltered, vertical sheltered, and tilted non-sheltered conditions. The effect of surface area on measured steel mass loss was also explored to identify the veracity of the so-called “edge effect”. Efforts were made to correlate meteorological atmospheric conditions (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, wind direction, etc.) to the monthly assessment of corrosion damage. Results were assessed in terms of steel mass loss. Additive composite monthly corrosion damage tended to significantly overshoot the observed cumulative corrosion damage for samples exposed over the same period. This observation, among others presented herein, suggests that exposure of samples for less than 6 months is not an adequate predictor of long-term, natural exposure. Additionally, a smaller sample had a larger area-normalized mass loss than a larger sample. The influence of the sample edge (especially the bottom edge) was implicated in causing this difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrosion and Materials Degradation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrosion and Materials Degradation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd4010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrosion and Materials Degradation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在佛罗里达基韦斯特(Key West Florida)一个可控的NRL试验场,对海洋大气腐蚀进行了严格的评估。先前文献中涉及的影响工程材料在大气暴露中腐蚀的某些因素被分离出来并进行了探索。特别探讨了样本大小和取向的影响。低碳钢(C1010)见证券在垂直无遮蔽、垂直有遮蔽和倾斜无遮蔽条件下暴露。还探讨了表面面积对测量钢质量损失的影响,以确定所谓的“边缘效应”的准确性。人们努力将气象大气条件(温度、相对湿度、风速、风向等)与腐蚀损害的月度评估联系起来。结果是根据钢质量损失来评估的。对于同一时期暴露的样品,添加剂复合月腐蚀损伤倾向于显著超过观察到的累积腐蚀损伤。这一观察结果以及本文提出的其他观察结果表明,样本暴露时间少于6个月并不能充分预测长期自然暴露。此外,较小的样品比较大的样品具有较大的面积归一化质量损失。样品边缘(特别是底部边缘)的影响与造成这种差异有关。
Experimental Design Considerations for Assessing Atmospheric Corrosion in a Marine Environment: Surrogate C1010 Steel
A rigorous assessment of marine atmospheric corrosion at a controlled NRL test site in Key West Florida was conducted. Certain factors which have been previously implicated in the literature as influencing the corrosion of engineering materials in atmospheric exposure were isolated and explored. In particular, the effect of sample size and orientation was explored. Low carbon steel (C1010) witness coupons were exposed in vertical non-sheltered, vertical sheltered, and tilted non-sheltered conditions. The effect of surface area on measured steel mass loss was also explored to identify the veracity of the so-called “edge effect”. Efforts were made to correlate meteorological atmospheric conditions (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, wind direction, etc.) to the monthly assessment of corrosion damage. Results were assessed in terms of steel mass loss. Additive composite monthly corrosion damage tended to significantly overshoot the observed cumulative corrosion damage for samples exposed over the same period. This observation, among others presented herein, suggests that exposure of samples for less than 6 months is not an adequate predictor of long-term, natural exposure. Additionally, a smaller sample had a larger area-normalized mass loss than a larger sample. The influence of the sample edge (especially the bottom edge) was implicated in causing this difference.