{"title":"在乌克兰南部自然水域,全圆线虫病与其他类型的掠食性鱼类寄生入侵的关系","authors":"S. Honcharov","doi":"10.15407/animbiol21.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the result of the research of predatory fishes — sander (Sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758), perch (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758) and pike (Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758) in the waters of the Dnipro-Buh estuary and in the delta of the Dnipro river. The possible associations of eustrongylidosis with other types of parasitic invasions of fishes have been established. It has been revealed up that the researched fish has been invaded mostly by such agents of parasitic diseases as digenetic trematodes and nematodes — 35.6 % and 31.8 % respectively. The least common group of parasites affecting commercial fishes was acanthocephalides — 0.71 %. The invasion of perches by the diplostomosis agents was noticed. The invasion extensiveness (IE) counted 50.7 %, and the invasion intensiveness (II) counted 2–41 samples. Other parasitic diseases affecting perches were paracoenogonymonosis (ІE — 15.3 %, ІІ — 7–31 samples); post diplostomosis (ІE — 9.97 %, ІІ — 87–118 metacecaria); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 37.2 %, ІІ — 5–14 samples); lavral trienophorosis (ІE — 1.66 %, ІІ — 2–5 cysts); eustrongylidosis (ІE ІІ — 1–3 samples);argulosis (ІE — 12 %, ІІ — 6–18 samples); ergazylosis (ЕІ — 6.02 %, ІІ — 11–26 maxillopods); The parasitic fauna of pikes is characterized by the agents of diplopstomosis (ІE — 62 %, ІІ — 3–17 larvae); paracoegonimosis (ІE — 42.7 %, ІІ — 1–38 metacecaria); postodiplostomosis (ІE — 10.7 %, ІІ — 23–51 sam-ples); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 17.8 %, ІІ — 2–15 samples); diplozoonosis (ІE — 0.67 %, ІІ — 1 sample); trienophorosis (ІE — 56.5 %, ІІ — 1–9 samples); valiporosis (ІE — 24.9 %, ІІ — 1–11 plerocercoids); eustrongylidosis (ІE — 58.9 %, ІІ — 1–13 larvae); rafidoscarosis (ІE — 76.4 %, ІІ — 8–31 nematodes); pseudoekhinorinchosis (ІE — 2.02 %, ІІ — 2–9 acanthocephala); argulosis (ІE — 28.2 %, ІІ — 2–63 parasites). The parasitic invasions of slander were also registered: for example, with diplopstomosis (ІE — 52.7 %, ІІ — 1–13 parasites); paracoenogonymonosis (ІE — 15.3 %, ІІ — 1–17 metacecaria); postodiplostomosis (ІE — 8.8 %, ІІ — 5–84 larvae); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 31 %, ІІ — 2–23 samples); valiporosis (ІE — 5.9 %, ІІ — 1–2 plerocercoids); eustrongylidosis (ІE — 58.1 %, ІІ — 1–9 samples); rafidoscarosis (ІE — 18.2 %, ІІ — 5–8 nematodes); pseudo-ekhinorinchosis (ІE — 0.49 %, ІІ — 2 acanthocephala); ergazylosis (IE — 47.2 %, ІІ — 7–28 maxillopods).","PeriodicalId":22372,"journal":{"name":"The Animal Biology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of eustrongylidosis with other types of parasitic invasions of the predatory fishes in the natural waters of Southern Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"S. Honcharov\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/animbiol21.04.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the result of the research of predatory fishes — sander (Sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758), perch (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758) and pike (Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758) in the waters of the Dnipro-Buh estuary and in the delta of the Dnipro river. The possible associations of eustrongylidosis with other types of parasitic invasions of fishes have been established. It has been revealed up that the researched fish has been invaded mostly by such agents of parasitic diseases as digenetic trematodes and nematodes — 35.6 % and 31.8 % respectively. The least common group of parasites affecting commercial fishes was acanthocephalides — 0.71 %. The invasion of perches by the diplostomosis agents was noticed. The invasion extensiveness (IE) counted 50.7 %, and the invasion intensiveness (II) counted 2–41 samples. Other parasitic diseases affecting perches were paracoenogonymonosis (ІE — 15.3 %, ІІ — 7–31 samples); post diplostomosis (ІE — 9.97 %, ІІ — 87–118 metacecaria); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 37.2 %, ІІ — 5–14 samples); lavral trienophorosis (ІE — 1.66 %, ІІ — 2–5 cysts); eustrongylidosis (ІE ІІ — 1–3 samples);argulosis (ІE — 12 %, ІІ — 6–18 samples); ergazylosis (ЕІ — 6.02 %, ІІ — 11–26 maxillopods); The parasitic fauna of pikes is characterized by the agents of diplopstomosis (ІE — 62 %, ІІ — 3–17 larvae); paracoegonimosis (ІE — 42.7 %, ІІ — 1–38 metacecaria); postodiplostomosis (ІE — 10.7 %, ІІ — 23–51 sam-ples); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 17.8 %, ІІ — 2–15 samples); diplozoonosis (ІE — 0.67 %, ІІ — 1 sample); trienophorosis (ІE — 56.5 %, ІІ — 1–9 samples); valiporosis (ІE — 24.9 %, ІІ — 1–11 plerocercoids); eustrongylidosis (ІE — 58.9 %, ІІ — 1–13 larvae); rafidoscarosis (ІE — 76.4 %, ІІ — 8–31 nematodes); pseudoekhinorinchosis (ІE — 2.02 %, ІІ — 2–9 acanthocephala); argulosis (ІE — 28.2 %, ІІ — 2–63 parasites). The parasitic invasions of slander were also registered: for example, with diplopstomosis (ІE — 52.7 %, ІІ — 1–13 parasites); paracoenogonymonosis (ІE — 15.3 %, ІІ — 1–17 metacecaria); postodiplostomosis (ІE — 8.8 %, ІІ — 5–84 larvae); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 31 %, ІІ — 2–23 samples); valiporosis (ІE — 5.9 %, ІІ — 1–2 plerocercoids); eustrongylidosis (ІE — 58.1 %, ІІ — 1–9 samples); rafidoscarosis (ІE — 18.2 %, ІІ — 5–8 nematodes); pseudo-ekhinorinchosis (ІE — 0.49 %, ІІ — 2 acanthocephala); ergazylosis (IE — 47.2 %, ІІ — 7–28 maxillopods).\",\"PeriodicalId\":22372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Animal Biology\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Animal Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/animbiol21.04.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Animal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/animbiol21.04.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文介绍了第聂伯河河口和第聂伯河三角洲食肉鱼类——沙鲈(sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758)、鲈鱼(Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758)和梭子鱼(Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758)的研究结果。全圆线虫病可能与其他类型的鱼类寄生入侵有关。研究表明,鱼类主要受到遗传吸虫和线虫等寄生虫病病原的侵害,分别占35.6%和31.8%。影响商业鱼类的寄生虫中最不常见的是棘头虫,占0.71%。注意到寄生菌对栖木的侵袭。侵袭广泛性(IE)占50.7%,侵袭强度(II)占2 ~ 41例。影响栖木的其他寄生虫病为副喙单胞虫病(ІE - 15.3%, ІІ - 7-31份);后双口病(ІE - 9.97%, ІІ - 87-118);dactygyrosis (ІE - 37.2%, ІІ - 5-14个样本);三鼻虫病(ІE - 1.66%, ІІ - 2-5个囊肿);真圆线虫病(ІE ІІ - 1-3个样本);争论病(ІE - 12%, ІІ - 6-18个样本);蛲虫病(ЕІ - 6.02%, ІІ - 11-26);寄生区系以双口寄生为主(ІE - 62%, ІІ - 3-17幼虫);副绦虫病(ІE - 42.7%, ІІ - 1-38);双口后畸形(ІE - 10.7%, ІІ - 23-51例);dactygyrosis (ІE - 17.8%, ІІ - 2-15个样本);二plozoonosis (ІE - 0.67%, ІІ - 1份);三线虫病(ІE - 56.5%, ІІ - 1-9个样本);骨质疏松症(ІE - 24.9%, ІІ - 1-11);全圆线虫病(ІE - 58.9%, ІІ - 1-13只幼虫);rafidoscarosis (ІE - 76.4%, ІІ - 8-31线虫);假棘头虫病(ІE - 2.02%, ІІ - 2-9棘头虫);争论病(ІE - 28.2%, ІІ - 2-63寄生虫)。诽谤的寄生入侵也被记录下来:例如,双口病(ІE - 52.7%, ІІ - 1-13寄生虫);性腺单胞菌病(ІE - 15.3%, ІІ - 1-17);双口后病(ІE - 8.8%, ІІ - 5-84只幼虫);dactygyrosis (ІE - 31%, ІІ - 2-23个样本);骨质疏松症(ІE - 5.9%, ІІ - 1-2倍倍);全圆线虫病(ІE - 58.1%, ІІ - 1-9个样本);rafidoscarosis (ІE - 18.2%, ІІ - 5-8个线虫);伪棘鼻病(ІE - 0.49%, ІІ - 2棘头);棘球菌病(IE - 47.2%, ІІ - 7-28)。
The association of eustrongylidosis with other types of parasitic invasions of the predatory fishes in the natural waters of Southern Ukraine
The article presents the result of the research of predatory fishes — sander (Sander lucioperca Linnaeus, 1758), perch (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758) and pike (Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758) in the waters of the Dnipro-Buh estuary and in the delta of the Dnipro river. The possible associations of eustrongylidosis with other types of parasitic invasions of fishes have been established. It has been revealed up that the researched fish has been invaded mostly by such agents of parasitic diseases as digenetic trematodes and nematodes — 35.6 % and 31.8 % respectively. The least common group of parasites affecting commercial fishes was acanthocephalides — 0.71 %. The invasion of perches by the diplostomosis agents was noticed. The invasion extensiveness (IE) counted 50.7 %, and the invasion intensiveness (II) counted 2–41 samples. Other parasitic diseases affecting perches were paracoenogonymonosis (ІE — 15.3 %, ІІ — 7–31 samples); post diplostomosis (ІE — 9.97 %, ІІ — 87–118 metacecaria); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 37.2 %, ІІ — 5–14 samples); lavral trienophorosis (ІE — 1.66 %, ІІ — 2–5 cysts); eustrongylidosis (ІE ІІ — 1–3 samples);argulosis (ІE — 12 %, ІІ — 6–18 samples); ergazylosis (ЕІ — 6.02 %, ІІ — 11–26 maxillopods); The parasitic fauna of pikes is characterized by the agents of diplopstomosis (ІE — 62 %, ІІ — 3–17 larvae); paracoegonimosis (ІE — 42.7 %, ІІ — 1–38 metacecaria); postodiplostomosis (ІE — 10.7 %, ІІ — 23–51 sam-ples); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 17.8 %, ІІ — 2–15 samples); diplozoonosis (ІE — 0.67 %, ІІ — 1 sample); trienophorosis (ІE — 56.5 %, ІІ — 1–9 samples); valiporosis (ІE — 24.9 %, ІІ — 1–11 plerocercoids); eustrongylidosis (ІE — 58.9 %, ІІ — 1–13 larvae); rafidoscarosis (ІE — 76.4 %, ІІ — 8–31 nematodes); pseudoekhinorinchosis (ІE — 2.02 %, ІІ — 2–9 acanthocephala); argulosis (ІE — 28.2 %, ІІ — 2–63 parasites). The parasitic invasions of slander were also registered: for example, with diplopstomosis (ІE — 52.7 %, ІІ — 1–13 parasites); paracoenogonymonosis (ІE — 15.3 %, ІІ — 1–17 metacecaria); postodiplostomosis (ІE — 8.8 %, ІІ — 5–84 larvae); dactylogyrosis (ІE — 31 %, ІІ — 2–23 samples); valiporosis (ІE — 5.9 %, ІІ — 1–2 plerocercoids); eustrongylidosis (ІE — 58.1 %, ІІ — 1–9 samples); rafidoscarosis (ІE — 18.2 %, ІІ — 5–8 nematodes); pseudo-ekhinorinchosis (ІE — 0.49 %, ІІ — 2 acanthocephala); ergazylosis (IE — 47.2 %, ІІ — 7–28 maxillopods).