P. Lantelme, C. Mestre, M. Lièvre, A. Gressard, H. Milon
{"title":"心率:脉搏波速度评估的重要混杂因素","authors":"P. Lantelme, C. Mestre, M. Lièvre, A. Gressard, H. Milon","doi":"10.1161/01.HYP.0000019132.41066.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arterial stiffness is a strong determinant of cardiovascular risk. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an index of arterial stiffness, and its prognostic value has been repeatedly emphasized. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of heart rate (HR) on PWV. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 77.8±8.4 (SD) years and permanent cardiac pacing were studied. In each subject, PWV was measured at 5 different pacing frequencies in the same session (60, 70, 80, 90, 100 bpm), the order of the various frequencies being randomly determined. Furthermore, to test the reproducibility, a repeat measurement of PWV was obtained in one randomly selected frequency. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by conventional means at each pacing frequency. PWV appeared fairly reproducible because no significant difference was disclosed between the 2 measurements obtained at the same HR level (P =0.5) and both measurements were strongly correlated (r =0.87, P <0.001). No significant BP variation was observed during pacing. There was a highly significant effect of HR on PWV estimated by a one-way, within-subjects analysis of variance (P =0.01). This study demonstrates that HR is an important factor in the intraindividual variation of PWV in elderly subjects. This raises methodological concern about the measurement of this parameter. Standardizing PWV for HR level seems mandatory if one wants to interpret PWV changes in clinical trials or in the follow-up of patients.","PeriodicalId":13233,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"51 1","pages":"1083-1087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"358","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart Rate: An Important Confounder of Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment\",\"authors\":\"P. Lantelme, C. Mestre, M. Lièvre, A. Gressard, H. Milon\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.HYP.0000019132.41066.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arterial stiffness is a strong determinant of cardiovascular risk. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an index of arterial stiffness, and its prognostic value has been repeatedly emphasized. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of heart rate (HR) on PWV. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 77.8±8.4 (SD) years and permanent cardiac pacing were studied. In each subject, PWV was measured at 5 different pacing frequencies in the same session (60, 70, 80, 90, 100 bpm), the order of the various frequencies being randomly determined. Furthermore, to test the reproducibility, a repeat measurement of PWV was obtained in one randomly selected frequency. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by conventional means at each pacing frequency. PWV appeared fairly reproducible because no significant difference was disclosed between the 2 measurements obtained at the same HR level (P =0.5) and both measurements were strongly correlated (r =0.87, P <0.001). No significant BP variation was observed during pacing. There was a highly significant effect of HR on PWV estimated by a one-way, within-subjects analysis of variance (P =0.01). This study demonstrates that HR is an important factor in the intraindividual variation of PWV in elderly subjects. This raises methodological concern about the measurement of this parameter. Standardizing PWV for HR level seems mandatory if one wants to interpret PWV changes in clinical trials or in the follow-up of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1083-1087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"358\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000019132.41066.95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000019132.41066.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 358
摘要
动脉僵硬度是心血管风险的重要决定因素。脉搏波速度(PWV)是动脉硬度的一项指标,其预后价值已被反复强调。本研究的目的是评估心率(HR)对PWV的影响。研究对象22例,平均年龄77.8±8.4 (SD)岁,永久性心脏起搏。每个受试者在同一时段内以5个不同的起搏频率(60,70,80,90,100bpm)测量PWV,各频率的顺序随机确定。此外,为了测试再现性,在一个随机选择的频率上获得了PWV的重复测量。采用常规方法测量各起搏频率的血压(BP)。PWV具有相当的可重复性,因为在相同HR水平下获得的两个测量值之间没有显着差异(P =0.5),并且两个测量值都具有强相关性(r =0.87, P <0.001)。起搏期间未观察到明显的血压变化。通过单因素、受试者内方差分析估计,HR对PWV的影响非常显著(P =0.01)。本研究表明,HR是导致老年人PWV个体差异的重要因素。这引起了对该参数测量方法的关注。如果想要在临床试验或患者随访中解释PWV的变化,标准化PWV的HR水平似乎是强制性的。
Heart Rate: An Important Confounder of Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment
Arterial stiffness is a strong determinant of cardiovascular risk. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an index of arterial stiffness, and its prognostic value has been repeatedly emphasized. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of heart rate (HR) on PWV. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 77.8±8.4 (SD) years and permanent cardiac pacing were studied. In each subject, PWV was measured at 5 different pacing frequencies in the same session (60, 70, 80, 90, 100 bpm), the order of the various frequencies being randomly determined. Furthermore, to test the reproducibility, a repeat measurement of PWV was obtained in one randomly selected frequency. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by conventional means at each pacing frequency. PWV appeared fairly reproducible because no significant difference was disclosed between the 2 measurements obtained at the same HR level (P =0.5) and both measurements were strongly correlated (r =0.87, P <0.001). No significant BP variation was observed during pacing. There was a highly significant effect of HR on PWV estimated by a one-way, within-subjects analysis of variance (P =0.01). This study demonstrates that HR is an important factor in the intraindividual variation of PWV in elderly subjects. This raises methodological concern about the measurement of this parameter. Standardizing PWV for HR level seems mandatory if one wants to interpret PWV changes in clinical trials or in the follow-up of patients.