因胎儿状态不稳定而进行剖宫产的决定在一天中的不同时间不同吗?(身份证:1376814)

Bridget C. Huysman, E. Carter, Shelby M. Dickison, J. Kelly, N. Raghuraman, C. Woolfolk
{"title":"因胎儿状态不稳定而进行剖宫产的决定在一天中的不同时间不同吗?(身份证:1376814)","authors":"Bridget C. Huysman, E. Carter, Shelby M. Dickison, J. Kelly, N. Raghuraman, C. Woolfolk","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930044.38698.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) is a diagnosis lacking standardized definitions, making the diagnosis susceptible to bias and systemic factors. We assessed whether the decision to proceed with intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) was associated with time of the day and whether this relationship was influenced by the presence of in-house obstetricians. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of term pregnancies admitted in spontaneous labor or for induction between January 2019 and June 2021. The primary outcome was decision to perform intrapartum CD for NRFS. Generalized additive models with smoothing splines were used to explore nonlinear associations between time of day and CD rates. Results were then stratified by whether the attending obstetrician was in-house or remote. RESULTS: Of 5,526 deliveries, 6.0% were intrapartum CD for NRFS. In the overall cohort, CD for NRFS was consistent throughout the day (P=.056). For patients with in-house obstetricians, the decision for CD for NRFS was not influenced by time of day (P=.072). For patients without in-house obstetricians, the decision to perform CD for NRFS was influenced by the time of day (P=.028), with a decreasing frequency from midnight to afternoon with nadir at 15:00 (2.5%), and a subsequent increasing frequency that peaked at 23:00 (10.3%). CONCLUSION: The decision to perform CD for NRFS is influenced by the time of day when the obstetrician is not in-house. This decision is not affected by time of day when the obstetrician is in-house. Systemic factors such as immediate obstetrician availability affect the diagnosis of NRFS.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Decision to Perform Cesarean Delivery for Nonreassuring Fetal Status Vary by Time of Day? [ID: 1376814]\",\"authors\":\"Bridget C. Huysman, E. Carter, Shelby M. Dickison, J. Kelly, N. Raghuraman, C. Woolfolk\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aog.0000930044.38698.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) is a diagnosis lacking standardized definitions, making the diagnosis susceptible to bias and systemic factors. We assessed whether the decision to proceed with intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) was associated with time of the day and whether this relationship was influenced by the presence of in-house obstetricians. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of term pregnancies admitted in spontaneous labor or for induction between January 2019 and June 2021. The primary outcome was decision to perform intrapartum CD for NRFS. Generalized additive models with smoothing splines were used to explore nonlinear associations between time of day and CD rates. Results were then stratified by whether the attending obstetrician was in-house or remote. RESULTS: Of 5,526 deliveries, 6.0% were intrapartum CD for NRFS. In the overall cohort, CD for NRFS was consistent throughout the day (P=.056). For patients with in-house obstetricians, the decision for CD for NRFS was not influenced by time of day (P=.072). For patients without in-house obstetricians, the decision to perform CD for NRFS was influenced by the time of day (P=.028), with a decreasing frequency from midnight to afternoon with nadir at 15:00 (2.5%), and a subsequent increasing frequency that peaked at 23:00 (10.3%). CONCLUSION: The decision to perform CD for NRFS is influenced by the time of day when the obstetrician is not in-house. This decision is not affected by time of day when the obstetrician is in-house. Systemic factors such as immediate obstetrician availability affect the diagnosis of NRFS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930044.38698.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930044.38698.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:不可靠胎儿状态(NRFS)是一种缺乏标准化定义的诊断,使得诊断容易受到偏见和系统性因素的影响。我们评估了进行产时剖宫产(CD)的决定是否与一天中的时间有关,以及这种关系是否受到产科医生在场的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2019年1月至2021年6月期间自然分娩或引产的足月妊娠。主要结局是决定对NRFS进行产时CD治疗。采用光滑样条的广义加性模型来探讨时间与CD率之间的非线性关系。然后根据主治产科医生是否在医院或远程对结果进行分层。结果:5526例分娩中,6.0%为NRFS产时CD。在整个队列中,NRFS的CD一整天都是一致的(P= 0.056)。对于住院产科医生的患者,对NRFS的CD决定不受一天中的时间的影响(P= 0.072)。对于没有产科医生的患者,对NRFS实施CD的决定受到一天中的时间的影响(P= 0.028),从午夜到下午频率下降,最低点在15:00(2.5%),随后频率增加,在23:00达到峰值(10.3%)。结论:对NRFS实施CD的决定受到一天中产科医生不在医院的时间的影响。这个决定不受产科医生在医院的时间的影响。全身性因素,如立即产科医生的可用性影响NRFS的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Decision to Perform Cesarean Delivery for Nonreassuring Fetal Status Vary by Time of Day? [ID: 1376814]
INTRODUCTION: Nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) is a diagnosis lacking standardized definitions, making the diagnosis susceptible to bias and systemic factors. We assessed whether the decision to proceed with intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) was associated with time of the day and whether this relationship was influenced by the presence of in-house obstetricians. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of term pregnancies admitted in spontaneous labor or for induction between January 2019 and June 2021. The primary outcome was decision to perform intrapartum CD for NRFS. Generalized additive models with smoothing splines were used to explore nonlinear associations between time of day and CD rates. Results were then stratified by whether the attending obstetrician was in-house or remote. RESULTS: Of 5,526 deliveries, 6.0% were intrapartum CD for NRFS. In the overall cohort, CD for NRFS was consistent throughout the day (P=.056). For patients with in-house obstetricians, the decision for CD for NRFS was not influenced by time of day (P=.072). For patients without in-house obstetricians, the decision to perform CD for NRFS was influenced by the time of day (P=.028), with a decreasing frequency from midnight to afternoon with nadir at 15:00 (2.5%), and a subsequent increasing frequency that peaked at 23:00 (10.3%). CONCLUSION: The decision to perform CD for NRFS is influenced by the time of day when the obstetrician is not in-house. This decision is not affected by time of day when the obstetrician is in-house. Systemic factors such as immediate obstetrician availability affect the diagnosis of NRFS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信