沙特阿拉伯Al-Kharj省卫生保健专业学生对标准隔离预防措施的了解和遵守情况

Maher Alotaibi, Saad Almasari, AbdalazizNasser M Alkadam, Yousif Abdullah Alanazi, Khalid Al Gahtani
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯Al-Kharj省卫生保健专业学生对标准隔离预防措施的了解和遵守情况","authors":"Maher Alotaibi, Saad Almasari, AbdalazizNasser M Alkadam, Yousif Abdullah Alanazi, Khalid Al Gahtani","doi":"10.4103/JHS.JHS_94_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Standard isolation precautions (SIPs) are clinical practice policies and guidelines for controlling healthcare associated infections (HCAIs). Healthcare students are frequently exposed to HAIs and their abidance of SIPs is paramount. This study is designated to evaluate healthcare students' knowledge and compliance with SIPs. It also identifies the most frequent sources of their information. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 5th January to 16th February 2016 at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University in Al-Kharj Governorate, Saudi Arabia. A novel self-constructed questionnaire was taken from a literature review and reused. Results: About 353 students, of which 73.4% being males with a mean age of 22.3; 1.53 (mean; standard deviation), were surveyed. Seventy percent had previously attended an infection control course. The overall means of knowledge and compliance with SIPs were included within highest ranges. This means that the study sample agreed with all correct answers of knowledge questions and always complied with all recommended statements of compliance. The most frequent source of information was self-learning while the current curriculum was the least frequent. Females were found to have higher mean scores in knowledge and compliance, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). According to the results of one-way analysis of variance, there were statistically significant differences in mean scores of knowledge and compliance between different specialities and academic levels. Conclusion: Despite the relatively weak role played by the current curriculum, this sample showed above average overall means of knowledge and compliance with SIPs.","PeriodicalId":31033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Specialties","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and compliance with standard isolation precautions among healthcare students in Al-Kharj Governorate, Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Maher Alotaibi, Saad Almasari, AbdalazizNasser M Alkadam, Yousif Abdullah Alanazi, Khalid Al Gahtani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JHS.JHS_94_16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: Standard isolation precautions (SIPs) are clinical practice policies and guidelines for controlling healthcare associated infections (HCAIs). Healthcare students are frequently exposed to HAIs and their abidance of SIPs is paramount. This study is designated to evaluate healthcare students' knowledge and compliance with SIPs. It also identifies the most frequent sources of their information. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 5th January to 16th February 2016 at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University in Al-Kharj Governorate, Saudi Arabia. A novel self-constructed questionnaire was taken from a literature review and reused. Results: About 353 students, of which 73.4% being males with a mean age of 22.3; 1.53 (mean; standard deviation), were surveyed. Seventy percent had previously attended an infection control course. The overall means of knowledge and compliance with SIPs were included within highest ranges. This means that the study sample agreed with all correct answers of knowledge questions and always complied with all recommended statements of compliance. The most frequent source of information was self-learning while the current curriculum was the least frequent. Females were found to have higher mean scores in knowledge and compliance, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). According to the results of one-way analysis of variance, there were statistically significant differences in mean scores of knowledge and compliance between different specialities and academic levels. Conclusion: Despite the relatively weak role played by the current curriculum, this sample showed above average overall means of knowledge and compliance with SIPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Specialties\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Specialties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JHS.JHS_94_16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JHS.JHS_94_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景和目的:标准隔离预防措施(SIPs)是控制医疗保健相关感染(HCAIs)的临床实践政策和指南。医疗保健专业的学生经常接触到健康影响因素,他们遵守健康影响因素是至关重要的。本研究旨在评估卫生保健专业学生的知识和遵从性。它还确定了最常见的信息来源。方法:2016年1月5日至2月16日,在沙特阿拉伯Al-Kharj省萨塔姆·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹王子大学进行了一项横断面调查。从文献综述中提取了一份新颖的自编问卷,并重复使用。结果:在校学生353人,其中男生占73.4%,平均年龄22.3岁;1.53(意思是;标准偏差),被调查。70%的人之前参加过感染控制课程。知识和遵守sip的总体手段包括在最高范围内。这意味着研究样本同意所有知识问题的正确答案,并始终遵守所有建议的遵守声明。最常见的信息来源是自学,而目前的课程是最不常见的。女性在知识和依从性方面得分较高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。单因素方差分析结果显示,不同专业、不同学术水平学生的知识依从性得分均值差异有统计学意义。结论:尽管当前课程发挥的作用相对较弱,但该样本的总体知识水平和对SIPs的依从性高于平均水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and compliance with standard isolation precautions among healthcare students in Al-Kharj Governorate, Saudi Arabia
Background and Objectives: Standard isolation precautions (SIPs) are clinical practice policies and guidelines for controlling healthcare associated infections (HCAIs). Healthcare students are frequently exposed to HAIs and their abidance of SIPs is paramount. This study is designated to evaluate healthcare students' knowledge and compliance with SIPs. It also identifies the most frequent sources of their information. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 5th January to 16th February 2016 at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University in Al-Kharj Governorate, Saudi Arabia. A novel self-constructed questionnaire was taken from a literature review and reused. Results: About 353 students, of which 73.4% being males with a mean age of 22.3; 1.53 (mean; standard deviation), were surveyed. Seventy percent had previously attended an infection control course. The overall means of knowledge and compliance with SIPs were included within highest ranges. This means that the study sample agreed with all correct answers of knowledge questions and always complied with all recommended statements of compliance. The most frequent source of information was self-learning while the current curriculum was the least frequent. Females were found to have higher mean scores in knowledge and compliance, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). According to the results of one-way analysis of variance, there were statistically significant differences in mean scores of knowledge and compliance between different specialities and academic levels. Conclusion: Despite the relatively weak role played by the current curriculum, this sample showed above average overall means of knowledge and compliance with SIPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信