作业治疗干预解决小学学龄儿童书写缺陷:如何、多少、多久?范围审查

A. Cole
{"title":"作业治疗干预解决小学学龄儿童书写缺陷:如何、多少、多久?范围审查","authors":"A. Cole","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2022.2054487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Handwriting is a key occupation for school-aged children and one of the common reasons for referral to a school-based occupational therapist. There are many interventions offered by school-based occupational therapists and this scoping review aimed to examine specific intervention approaches and compare their mode of service delivery (i.e., direct and/or indirect), recommended dosage (i.e., frequency and duration), embedded theoretical frameworks, and identify if the intervention caused statistically significant changes in a child’s handwriting ability. Eight (8) studies were reviewed (seven Level III; one Level V) identified through a comprehensive database search. Of the eight studies that met the inclusion criteria, five were curriculum-based programs, all of which incorporated task-specific motor learning approaches and showed statistically significant improvement in handwriting (both direct and indirect OT involvement). Two studies reviewed devices (iPad and weighted pencil) and one study did not involve performing handwriting during treatment sessions. The studies reviewing the use of devices and the study where task-specific handwriting was not completed in treatment sessions did not demonstrate statistically significant benefit on improving a child’s handwriting ability. Curriculum-based interventions that have an embedded motor learning practice component, with either direct or indirect involvement from occupational therapy, may have a positive impact on a student’s handwriting ability; however, more rigorous studies need to be completed. The use of devices (i.e., iPad & weighted pencils) to improve handwriting is not currently supported in the literature.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"10 1","pages":"368 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational therapy intervention to address handwriting deficit in elementary-aged school children: How to, how much, and how often? A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"A. Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19411243.2022.2054487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Handwriting is a key occupation for school-aged children and one of the common reasons for referral to a school-based occupational therapist. There are many interventions offered by school-based occupational therapists and this scoping review aimed to examine specific intervention approaches and compare their mode of service delivery (i.e., direct and/or indirect), recommended dosage (i.e., frequency and duration), embedded theoretical frameworks, and identify if the intervention caused statistically significant changes in a child’s handwriting ability. Eight (8) studies were reviewed (seven Level III; one Level V) identified through a comprehensive database search. Of the eight studies that met the inclusion criteria, five were curriculum-based programs, all of which incorporated task-specific motor learning approaches and showed statistically significant improvement in handwriting (both direct and indirect OT involvement). Two studies reviewed devices (iPad and weighted pencil) and one study did not involve performing handwriting during treatment sessions. The studies reviewing the use of devices and the study where task-specific handwriting was not completed in treatment sessions did not demonstrate statistically significant benefit on improving a child’s handwriting ability. Curriculum-based interventions that have an embedded motor learning practice component, with either direct or indirect involvement from occupational therapy, may have a positive impact on a student’s handwriting ability; however, more rigorous studies need to be completed. The use of devices (i.e., iPad & weighted pencils) to improve handwriting is not currently supported in the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"368 - 381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2054487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2054487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

书写是学龄儿童的一个重要职业,也是转诊到校本职业治疗师的常见原因之一。学校职业治疗师提供了许多干预措施,本综述旨在检查具体的干预方法,并比较它们的服务提供模式(即直接和/或间接)、推荐剂量(即频率和持续时间)、嵌入的理论框架,并确定干预措施是否对儿童的书写能力产生了统计上显著的变化。回顾了8项研究(7项III级研究;一个级别V)通过全面的数据库搜索确定。在符合纳入标准的八项研究中,有五项是基于课程的项目,所有这些项目都结合了特定任务的运动学习方法,并在手写方面显示出统计上显著的改善(包括直接和间接的OT参与)。两项研究回顾了设备(iPad和加重铅笔),一项研究在治疗过程中不涉及手写。这些研究回顾了设备的使用,以及在治疗过程中没有完成特定任务的书写的研究,并没有显示出在提高孩子的书写能力方面有统计学上显著的好处。具有嵌入式运动学习实践成分的课程干预,直接或间接地参与职业治疗,可能对学生的书写能力产生积极影响;然而,需要完成更严格的研究。使用设备(即iPad和加重铅笔)来改善书写目前在文献中不支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational therapy intervention to address handwriting deficit in elementary-aged school children: How to, how much, and how often? A scoping review
ABSTRACT Handwriting is a key occupation for school-aged children and one of the common reasons for referral to a school-based occupational therapist. There are many interventions offered by school-based occupational therapists and this scoping review aimed to examine specific intervention approaches and compare their mode of service delivery (i.e., direct and/or indirect), recommended dosage (i.e., frequency and duration), embedded theoretical frameworks, and identify if the intervention caused statistically significant changes in a child’s handwriting ability. Eight (8) studies were reviewed (seven Level III; one Level V) identified through a comprehensive database search. Of the eight studies that met the inclusion criteria, five were curriculum-based programs, all of which incorporated task-specific motor learning approaches and showed statistically significant improvement in handwriting (both direct and indirect OT involvement). Two studies reviewed devices (iPad and weighted pencil) and one study did not involve performing handwriting during treatment sessions. The studies reviewing the use of devices and the study where task-specific handwriting was not completed in treatment sessions did not demonstrate statistically significant benefit on improving a child’s handwriting ability. Curriculum-based interventions that have an embedded motor learning practice component, with either direct or indirect involvement from occupational therapy, may have a positive impact on a student’s handwriting ability; however, more rigorous studies need to be completed. The use of devices (i.e., iPad & weighted pencils) to improve handwriting is not currently supported in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信