数字盗版和信息产品捆绑

Chenguang (Allen) Wu, Chen Jin, Atanu Lahiri
{"title":"数字盗版和信息产品捆绑","authors":"Chenguang (Allen) Wu, Chen Jin, Atanu Lahiri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3336488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bundling of information goods is quite common. As prior research shows, bundling is particularly profitable in their case because their marginal production cost is zero. However, information goods are known to be prone to piracy, and it is still not clear what impact, if any, piracy can have on the appeal of bundling. To address this, we reexamine bundling in the backdrop of piracy. We find that piracy diminishes the appeal of bundling to the extent that selling separately may become optimal despite zero marginal cost. Interestingly, even when product valuations are negatively correlated and bundling is anticipated to be even more effective, separate selling can be surprisingly optimal in the presence of piracy. This impact of piracy carries over to situations where a fraction of the users are ethical and do not consider piracy to be an option. Furthermore, piracy elevates the relative appeal of separate selling so much so that even mixed bundling becomes ineffective in certain situations. Collectively, our results point to the insight that the purported benefits of bundling may not fully materialize in the presence of piracy.","PeriodicalId":18300,"journal":{"name":"MatSciRN: Other Materials Processing & Manufacturing (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Piracy and Bundling of Information Goods\",\"authors\":\"Chenguang (Allen) Wu, Chen Jin, Atanu Lahiri\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3336488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bundling of information goods is quite common. As prior research shows, bundling is particularly profitable in their case because their marginal production cost is zero. However, information goods are known to be prone to piracy, and it is still not clear what impact, if any, piracy can have on the appeal of bundling. To address this, we reexamine bundling in the backdrop of piracy. We find that piracy diminishes the appeal of bundling to the extent that selling separately may become optimal despite zero marginal cost. Interestingly, even when product valuations are negatively correlated and bundling is anticipated to be even more effective, separate selling can be surprisingly optimal in the presence of piracy. This impact of piracy carries over to situations where a fraction of the users are ethical and do not consider piracy to be an option. Furthermore, piracy elevates the relative appeal of separate selling so much so that even mixed bundling becomes ineffective in certain situations. Collectively, our results point to the insight that the purported benefits of bundling may not fully materialize in the presence of piracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MatSciRN: Other Materials Processing & Manufacturing (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MatSciRN: Other Materials Processing & Manufacturing (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3336488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MatSciRN: Other Materials Processing & Manufacturing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3336488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

信息产品的捆绑销售非常普遍。正如先前的研究表明,在他们的情况下,捆绑销售特别有利可图,因为他们的边际生产成本为零。然而,众所周知,信息产品容易受到盗版的影响,而且目前还不清楚盗版会对捆绑销售的吸引力产生什么影响,如果有的话。为了解决这个问题,我们在盗版的背景下重新审视捆绑销售。我们发现,盗版降低了捆绑销售的吸引力,以至于在边际成本为零的情况下,单独销售可能是最优的。有趣的是,即使产品估值呈负相关,捆绑销售预期会更有效,但在存在盗版的情况下,单独销售可能是令人惊讶的最佳选择。盗版的影响还会延伸到一些情况,即一小部分用户是有道德的,他们不认为盗版是一种选择。此外,盗版提升了单独销售的相对吸引力,以至于在某些情况下,混合捆绑销售也变得无效。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在盗版存在的情况下,所谓的捆绑销售的好处可能不会完全实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Piracy and Bundling of Information Goods
Bundling of information goods is quite common. As prior research shows, bundling is particularly profitable in their case because their marginal production cost is zero. However, information goods are known to be prone to piracy, and it is still not clear what impact, if any, piracy can have on the appeal of bundling. To address this, we reexamine bundling in the backdrop of piracy. We find that piracy diminishes the appeal of bundling to the extent that selling separately may become optimal despite zero marginal cost. Interestingly, even when product valuations are negatively correlated and bundling is anticipated to be even more effective, separate selling can be surprisingly optimal in the presence of piracy. This impact of piracy carries over to situations where a fraction of the users are ethical and do not consider piracy to be an option. Furthermore, piracy elevates the relative appeal of separate selling so much so that even mixed bundling becomes ineffective in certain situations. Collectively, our results point to the insight that the purported benefits of bundling may not fully materialize in the presence of piracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信