"Los aposentos de la cabeza":《吉诃德》中的建筑与疯狂

MLN bulletin Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/mln.2022.0027
K. L. Brown
{"title":"\"Los aposentos de la cabeza\":《吉诃德》中的建筑与疯狂","authors":"K. L. Brown","doi":"10.1353/mln.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the fifteenth-century rediscovery of Vitruvius’ De architectura (1st century C.E.) at the Monastery of St. Gall, European theorists sought to redefine architecture as a fundamentally rational, mathematical endeavor. Leon Battista Alberti’s influential 1450 treatise made a distinction between the manual labor of the carpenter and the intellectual labor of the architect, emphasizing the “sure and wonderful reason and method” and the “knowledge of all the highest and most noble disciplines” by which the architect “knows both how to devise through his own mind and energy, and to realize by construction, whatever can be most beautifully fitted out for the noble needs of man” (5). Francesco di Giorgio Martini and Pietro Cataneo similarly noted the “good judgment” (giudizio), “ingenuity” (ingegno, Cataneo 185), “subtle imagination” (sottile immaginazione), and “reason” (raciocinazio, Martini 36-7) required to create “a single, harmonious work” (Alberti 23).1 The well-ordered building, according to early modern formulations of architecture, was one in which the highest speculative abilities had been exercised, assuring “the most handsome and effective position, order, and number” (313) of each component of the design and the rigorous observation of the principles of proportion, decorum, and symmetry.","PeriodicalId":78454,"journal":{"name":"MLN bulletin","volume":"5 1","pages":"239 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Los aposentos de la cabeza\\\": Architecture and Madness in the Quijote\",\"authors\":\"K. L. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mln.2022.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the fifteenth-century rediscovery of Vitruvius’ De architectura (1st century C.E.) at the Monastery of St. Gall, European theorists sought to redefine architecture as a fundamentally rational, mathematical endeavor. Leon Battista Alberti’s influential 1450 treatise made a distinction between the manual labor of the carpenter and the intellectual labor of the architect, emphasizing the “sure and wonderful reason and method” and the “knowledge of all the highest and most noble disciplines” by which the architect “knows both how to devise through his own mind and energy, and to realize by construction, whatever can be most beautifully fitted out for the noble needs of man” (5). Francesco di Giorgio Martini and Pietro Cataneo similarly noted the “good judgment” (giudizio), “ingenuity” (ingegno, Cataneo 185), “subtle imagination” (sottile immaginazione), and “reason” (raciocinazio, Martini 36-7) required to create “a single, harmonious work” (Alberti 23).1 The well-ordered building, according to early modern formulations of architecture, was one in which the highest speculative abilities had been exercised, assuring “the most handsome and effective position, order, and number” (313) of each component of the design and the rigorous observation of the principles of proportion, decorum, and symmetry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MLN bulletin\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MLN bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2022.0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MLN bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2022.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

继15世纪在圣加尔修道院重新发现维特鲁威的《建筑学》(公元1世纪)之后,欧洲理论家试图将建筑重新定义为一种基本的理性和数学努力。莱昂·巴蒂斯塔·阿尔贝蒂(Leon Battista Alberti)在1450年的一篇颇有影响力的论文中区分了木匠的体力劳动和建筑师的智力劳动,强调了“可靠而奇妙的理由和方法”以及“所有最高和最高贵的学科的知识”,建筑师“知道如何通过自己的思想和精力进行设计,并通过建筑实现,任何东西都可以最漂亮地适合人类的高贵需求”(5)。弗朗西斯科·迪·乔治·马蒂尼和彼得罗·卡塔内奥同样注意到“良好的判断力”(giudizio)、“独创性”(ingegno, Cataneo 185)、“微妙的想象力”(sotttile imaginazione)和“理性”(raciocinazio, Martini 36-7)需要创造“一个单一的、和谐的作品”(Alberti 23)根据早期现代建筑的公式,井然有序的建筑是运用了最高的推测能力的建筑,保证了每个设计组成部分的“最漂亮、最有效的位置、顺序和数量”(313),并严格遵守了比例、礼仪和对称的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Los aposentos de la cabeza": Architecture and Madness in the Quijote
Following the fifteenth-century rediscovery of Vitruvius’ De architectura (1st century C.E.) at the Monastery of St. Gall, European theorists sought to redefine architecture as a fundamentally rational, mathematical endeavor. Leon Battista Alberti’s influential 1450 treatise made a distinction between the manual labor of the carpenter and the intellectual labor of the architect, emphasizing the “sure and wonderful reason and method” and the “knowledge of all the highest and most noble disciplines” by which the architect “knows both how to devise through his own mind and energy, and to realize by construction, whatever can be most beautifully fitted out for the noble needs of man” (5). Francesco di Giorgio Martini and Pietro Cataneo similarly noted the “good judgment” (giudizio), “ingenuity” (ingegno, Cataneo 185), “subtle imagination” (sottile immaginazione), and “reason” (raciocinazio, Martini 36-7) required to create “a single, harmonious work” (Alberti 23).1 The well-ordered building, according to early modern formulations of architecture, was one in which the highest speculative abilities had been exercised, assuring “the most handsome and effective position, order, and number” (313) of each component of the design and the rigorous observation of the principles of proportion, decorum, and symmetry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信