陆上天然气生产装置运行阶段设计验证过程安全

Omar Mohammed Abdelsalam
{"title":"陆上天然气生产装置运行阶段设计验证过程安全","authors":"Omar Mohammed Abdelsalam","doi":"10.2118/193076-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is a mandatory company requirement for all offshore and onshore assets to secure the documentation and demonstration of process safety in design (PSID). The common way to conduct the PSID is to apply it within the \"Design phase\" and after the \"Execute phase\" to remove or minimize hazards and identify areas of process design that warrant specific focus. In this paper, we will show a case of implementing the PSID verification on an onshore gas production plant during operation phase which is different from the main approach and way of verification during earlier stages of project execution.\n Verification is intended to confirm that the detailed documentation and calculations supporting the requirements of the Process Engineering Process Safety Design Standard have been correctly performed.\n In broad terms the objective of the verification in the \"Operation phase\" was;To confirm that the extent of documentation available meets the minimum requirements of the company standards.To confirm that adequate layers of protection are being provided throughout the process to reduce risks to ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable).To confirm that all Blowdown systems and relief valve calculations have been correctly conducted and appropriate relief cases and basis have been used.To confirm that HAZOP/HAZID has been conducted in a reasonable manner and the actions have been closed out.To confirm that layers of protection analysis \"LOPA\" for all site safety instrumented functions (SIFs) as part of Safety Integrated Levels (SIL) assessment have been assessed and verified.To confirm that specification breaks have been properly located and HP/LP interfaces correctly designed.To confirm that the philosophies are complete, adequate and implemented.To confirm that process safety is being assured for the project and to identify and record any failings or flaws in approach, detailed calculations or design that require rectification.\n The design contractor produced a Process Safety Dossier which contained sections as following:Design PhilosophiesRelief and Blowdown DesignHP/LP InterfacesLOPAHAZOP/HAZID verification\n The outcome of the verification on the existing gas production plant was a list of findings categorized – from 1 to 4 – according to their priority from safety point of view. We ensured closure of the actions starting from code 1 and code 2 in a tight time frame to avoid any risk to be released.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"02 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Safety in Design Verification in Operational Phase for Onshore Gas Production Plant\",\"authors\":\"Omar Mohammed Abdelsalam\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/193076-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n It is a mandatory company requirement for all offshore and onshore assets to secure the documentation and demonstration of process safety in design (PSID). The common way to conduct the PSID is to apply it within the \\\"Design phase\\\" and after the \\\"Execute phase\\\" to remove or minimize hazards and identify areas of process design that warrant specific focus. In this paper, we will show a case of implementing the PSID verification on an onshore gas production plant during operation phase which is different from the main approach and way of verification during earlier stages of project execution.\\n Verification is intended to confirm that the detailed documentation and calculations supporting the requirements of the Process Engineering Process Safety Design Standard have been correctly performed.\\n In broad terms the objective of the verification in the \\\"Operation phase\\\" was;To confirm that the extent of documentation available meets the minimum requirements of the company standards.To confirm that adequate layers of protection are being provided throughout the process to reduce risks to ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable).To confirm that all Blowdown systems and relief valve calculations have been correctly conducted and appropriate relief cases and basis have been used.To confirm that HAZOP/HAZID has been conducted in a reasonable manner and the actions have been closed out.To confirm that layers of protection analysis \\\"LOPA\\\" for all site safety instrumented functions (SIFs) as part of Safety Integrated Levels (SIL) assessment have been assessed and verified.To confirm that specification breaks have been properly located and HP/LP interfaces correctly designed.To confirm that the philosophies are complete, adequate and implemented.To confirm that process safety is being assured for the project and to identify and record any failings or flaws in approach, detailed calculations or design that require rectification.\\n The design contractor produced a Process Safety Dossier which contained sections as following:Design PhilosophiesRelief and Blowdown DesignHP/LP InterfacesLOPAHAZOP/HAZID verification\\n The outcome of the verification on the existing gas production plant was a list of findings categorized – from 1 to 4 – according to their priority from safety point of view. We ensured closure of the actions starting from code 1 and code 2 in a tight time frame to avoid any risk to be released.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018\",\"volume\":\"02 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/193076-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193076-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保过程安全设计(PSID)的文档和演示是公司对所有海上和陆上资产的强制性要求。执行PSID的常见方法是在“设计阶段”和“执行阶段”之后应用它,以消除或最小化危险,并确定需要特别关注的工艺设计领域。在本文中,我们将展示一个在运营阶段在陆上天然气生产工厂实施PSID验证的案例,该案例与项目执行早期阶段的主要验证方法和方式不同。验证的目的是确认支持工艺工程工艺安全设计标准要求的详细文件和计算已经正确执行。广义地说,“运行阶段”的验证目标是:确认可用文件的范围满足公司标准的最低要求。确认在整个过程中提供了足够的保护层,以减少对ALARP的风险(尽可能低)。确认所有排污系统和安全阀的计算都已正确进行,并使用了适当的泄放案例和基础。确认HAZOP/HAZID以合理的方式执行,并且行动已经结束。确认作为安全综合水平(SIL)评估的一部分,所有现场安全仪表功能(SIFs)的防护层分析“LOPA”已被评估和验证。确认规范故障已正确定位,HP/LP接口设计正确。确认这些理念是完整、充分和执行的。确认项目的工艺安全得到保证,并识别和记录需要纠正的方法、详细计算或设计中的任何失败或缺陷。设计承包商制作了一份过程安全档案,其中包含以下部分:设计理念、减压和排污设计、hp /LP接口、lopahazop /HAZID验证。对现有气体生产工厂进行验证的结果是一份调查结果列表,根据其从安全角度的优先级从1到4进行分类。我们确保在很短的时间内完成从代码1和代码2开始的操作,以避免任何被释放的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process Safety in Design Verification in Operational Phase for Onshore Gas Production Plant
It is a mandatory company requirement for all offshore and onshore assets to secure the documentation and demonstration of process safety in design (PSID). The common way to conduct the PSID is to apply it within the "Design phase" and after the "Execute phase" to remove or minimize hazards and identify areas of process design that warrant specific focus. In this paper, we will show a case of implementing the PSID verification on an onshore gas production plant during operation phase which is different from the main approach and way of verification during earlier stages of project execution. Verification is intended to confirm that the detailed documentation and calculations supporting the requirements of the Process Engineering Process Safety Design Standard have been correctly performed. In broad terms the objective of the verification in the "Operation phase" was;To confirm that the extent of documentation available meets the minimum requirements of the company standards.To confirm that adequate layers of protection are being provided throughout the process to reduce risks to ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable).To confirm that all Blowdown systems and relief valve calculations have been correctly conducted and appropriate relief cases and basis have been used.To confirm that HAZOP/HAZID has been conducted in a reasonable manner and the actions have been closed out.To confirm that layers of protection analysis "LOPA" for all site safety instrumented functions (SIFs) as part of Safety Integrated Levels (SIL) assessment have been assessed and verified.To confirm that specification breaks have been properly located and HP/LP interfaces correctly designed.To confirm that the philosophies are complete, adequate and implemented.To confirm that process safety is being assured for the project and to identify and record any failings or flaws in approach, detailed calculations or design that require rectification. The design contractor produced a Process Safety Dossier which contained sections as following:Design PhilosophiesRelief and Blowdown DesignHP/LP InterfacesLOPAHAZOP/HAZID verification The outcome of the verification on the existing gas production plant was a list of findings categorized – from 1 to 4 – according to their priority from safety point of view. We ensured closure of the actions starting from code 1 and code 2 in a tight time frame to avoid any risk to be released.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信