{"title":"社会的发明?","authors":"B. Gray","doi":"10.1017/ahsse.2022.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper applies to ancient Greece an approach\n developed by Pierre Rosanvallon: the integration of philosophical\n texts with the most everyday documents to better grasp a society’s\n understanding of its political life. For the ancient polis, this means\n focusing on the more prosaic evidence offered by cities’ inscriptions,\n especially their collective decisions published on stone. It is used\n here to consider the changing ideas about the nature of political and\n private life—and especially the space between them. In a very\n influential model, Classical Athenian democrats and philosophers\n tended to insist on a sharp binary distinction between public/\n political life and private life, leaving little room for a notion of\n an intermediate third space of polis life, similar to a “social\n sphere” or “civil society.” This pattern remained dominant in the\n Hellenistic and Roman periods, but, especially after c. 150 BC, some\n Greek citizens and intellectuals developed, above all in inscriptions,\n a much more explicit, complex, and subtle notion of “social life” as\n something between politics and private life. The article concludes by\n asking what the different ancient concepts discussed can contribute to\n current historiographical debates about the nature of the Greek city\n after c. 150 BC, especially when it comes to moving beyond the\n traditional picture of “depoliticization.” It also calls into question\n the orthodox narrative of the development of ideas of “the social”\n over many centuries up to the present.","PeriodicalId":35258,"journal":{"name":"Annales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Invention of the Social?\",\"authors\":\"B. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ahsse.2022.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper applies to ancient Greece an approach\\n developed by Pierre Rosanvallon: the integration of philosophical\\n texts with the most everyday documents to better grasp a society’s\\n understanding of its political life. For the ancient polis, this means\\n focusing on the more prosaic evidence offered by cities’ inscriptions,\\n especially their collective decisions published on stone. It is used\\n here to consider the changing ideas about the nature of political and\\n private life—and especially the space between them. In a very\\n influential model, Classical Athenian democrats and philosophers\\n tended to insist on a sharp binary distinction between public/\\n political life and private life, leaving little room for a notion of\\n an intermediate third space of polis life, similar to a “social\\n sphere” or “civil society.” This pattern remained dominant in the\\n Hellenistic and Roman periods, but, especially after c. 150 BC, some\\n Greek citizens and intellectuals developed, above all in inscriptions,\\n a much more explicit, complex, and subtle notion of “social life” as\\n something between politics and private life. The article concludes by\\n asking what the different ancient concepts discussed can contribute to\\n current historiographical debates about the nature of the Greek city\\n after c. 150 BC, especially when it comes to moving beyond the\\n traditional picture of “depoliticization.” It also calls into question\\n the orthodox narrative of the development of ideas of “the social”\\n over many centuries up to the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ahsse.2022.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ahsse.2022.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper applies to ancient Greece an approach
developed by Pierre Rosanvallon: the integration of philosophical
texts with the most everyday documents to better grasp a society’s
understanding of its political life. For the ancient polis, this means
focusing on the more prosaic evidence offered by cities’ inscriptions,
especially their collective decisions published on stone. It is used
here to consider the changing ideas about the nature of political and
private life—and especially the space between them. In a very
influential model, Classical Athenian democrats and philosophers
tended to insist on a sharp binary distinction between public/
political life and private life, leaving little room for a notion of
an intermediate third space of polis life, similar to a “social
sphere” or “civil society.” This pattern remained dominant in the
Hellenistic and Roman periods, but, especially after c. 150 BC, some
Greek citizens and intellectuals developed, above all in inscriptions,
a much more explicit, complex, and subtle notion of “social life” as
something between politics and private life. The article concludes by
asking what the different ancient concepts discussed can contribute to
current historiographical debates about the nature of the Greek city
after c. 150 BC, especially when it comes to moving beyond the
traditional picture of “depoliticization.” It also calls into question
the orthodox narrative of the development of ideas of “the social”
over many centuries up to the present.
期刊介绍:
Fondée en 1929 par March Bloch et Lucien Febvre, les Annales illustrent, au-delà de ce prestigieux héritage, la recherche historique dans ce qu’elle a de plus innovant. Nouveaux domaines de la recherche et histoire comparée, ouverture sur les aires culturelles et réflexion épistémologique, signatures prestigieuses et jeunes historiens définissent l’esprit des Annales, revue d’histoire par excellence, dont le rayonnement est international. Au-delà de la discipline historique, les Annales jouent un rôle important dans le champ des sciences sociales et sont le lieu privilégié d"un dialogue raisonné entre les différentes sciences de l"homme.