Dong-Hwan Kim, Young Min Choi, Joonbum Lee, Sangsu Shin, Sanggu Kim, Yeunsu Suh, Kichoon Lee
{"title":"肉鸡和蛋鸡肌肉中 MSTN 同工酶的表达差异","authors":"Dong-Hwan Kim, Young Min Choi, Joonbum Lee, Sangsu Shin, Sanggu Kim, Yeunsu Suh, Kichoon Lee","doi":"10.3390/ani12050539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myostatin (Mstn)-A, the main isoform among Mstn splicing variants, functions as a negative regulator, whereas Mstn-B functions as a positive regulator in muscle development. Because broiler chickens are a fast-growing breed raised for meat production and layer chickens are a slow-growing breed raised for egg production, differences in the expression of <i>Mstn</i> isoforms between the two distinct breeds were analyzed in this study. There was no difference in the expression levels of total <i>Mstn</i> (<i>Mstn-A</i> and <i>-B</i> forms) during embryonic development and at D33 between the two breeds. Interestingly, the ratios of <i>Mstn-B</i> to <i>-A</i> were significantly higher in the broiler compared to the layer at most ages. In pectoralis major muscle (PM) tissue, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fiber was significantly greater in the broiler. The broiler also showed greater bundle CSA and a similar fiber number per bundle compared to the layer at D5 and D33. These data suggest that the greater bundle CSA with myofiber hypertrophy in the broilers is associated with greater muscle growth. The relationship between the expression of <i>Mstn</i> isoforms and growth rate can be used as a potential genetic marker for the selection of higher muscle growth in chickens.</p>","PeriodicalId":17327,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Expression of MSTN Isoforms in Muscle between Broiler and Layer Chickens.\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Hwan Kim, Young Min Choi, Joonbum Lee, Sangsu Shin, Sanggu Kim, Yeunsu Suh, Kichoon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ani12050539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Myostatin (Mstn)-A, the main isoform among Mstn splicing variants, functions as a negative regulator, whereas Mstn-B functions as a positive regulator in muscle development. Because broiler chickens are a fast-growing breed raised for meat production and layer chickens are a slow-growing breed raised for egg production, differences in the expression of <i>Mstn</i> isoforms between the two distinct breeds were analyzed in this study. There was no difference in the expression levels of total <i>Mstn</i> (<i>Mstn-A</i> and <i>-B</i> forms) during embryonic development and at D33 between the two breeds. Interestingly, the ratios of <i>Mstn-B</i> to <i>-A</i> were significantly higher in the broiler compared to the layer at most ages. In pectoralis major muscle (PM) tissue, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fiber was significantly greater in the broiler. The broiler also showed greater bundle CSA and a similar fiber number per bundle compared to the layer at D5 and D33. These data suggest that the greater bundle CSA with myofiber hypertrophy in the broilers is associated with greater muscle growth. The relationship between the expression of <i>Mstn</i> isoforms and growth rate can be used as a potential genetic marker for the selection of higher muscle growth in chickens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential Expression of MSTN Isoforms in Muscle between Broiler and Layer Chickens.
Myostatin (Mstn)-A, the main isoform among Mstn splicing variants, functions as a negative regulator, whereas Mstn-B functions as a positive regulator in muscle development. Because broiler chickens are a fast-growing breed raised for meat production and layer chickens are a slow-growing breed raised for egg production, differences in the expression of Mstn isoforms between the two distinct breeds were analyzed in this study. There was no difference in the expression levels of total Mstn (Mstn-A and -B forms) during embryonic development and at D33 between the two breeds. Interestingly, the ratios of Mstn-B to -A were significantly higher in the broiler compared to the layer at most ages. In pectoralis major muscle (PM) tissue, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fiber was significantly greater in the broiler. The broiler also showed greater bundle CSA and a similar fiber number per bundle compared to the layer at D5 and D33. These data suggest that the greater bundle CSA with myofiber hypertrophy in the broilers is associated with greater muscle growth. The relationship between the expression of Mstn isoforms and growth rate can be used as a potential genetic marker for the selection of higher muscle growth in chickens.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps aims to publish high quality research, reviews and case reports, as well as other invited articles, which pertain to the practice of military medicine in its broadest sense. It welcomes material from all ranks, services and corps wherever they serve as well as submissions from beyond the military. It is intended not only to propagate current knowledge and expertise but also to act as an institutional memory for the practice of medicine within the military.