网上研究生课程质量评价指标体系Perú, 2020

Enrique Manuel Durand Bazán
{"title":"网上研究生课程质量评价指标体系Perú, 2020","authors":"Enrique Manuel Durand Bazán","doi":"10.17268/rev.cyt.2022.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid evolution of e-learning makes necessary for models to evaluate their quality to evolve in the same way, so research in this field must be constant, contributing to improve the perspective of society regarding the quality of e-learning. There is a growing number of virtual universities. On this point, some theses have been developed that show the different models of evaluation of the quality of both face-to-face education and virtual education, but not applied to the Peruvian reality and to postgraduate programs. The present qualitative research develops a system of quality indicators from comparing twenty one (21) quality models from different regions that exist to evaluate virtual programs in different regions: Latin America, Europe, Africa, USA, and that have been proposed or updated in the last 15 years, most of them between 2008 and 2011. This proposal has been validated through surveys of experts of virtual programs. In conclusion it can be indicated that fifteen (15) dimensions or factors have been identified and fifty-six (56) indicators that better allow to evaluate the quality of the graduate programs in virtual modality in Peru.","PeriodicalId":21273,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ciencia y Tecnología El Higo","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System of quality indicators to evaluate online postgraduate programs in Perú, 2020\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Manuel Durand Bazán\",\"doi\":\"10.17268/rev.cyt.2022.01.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid evolution of e-learning makes necessary for models to evaluate their quality to evolve in the same way, so research in this field must be constant, contributing to improve the perspective of society regarding the quality of e-learning. There is a growing number of virtual universities. On this point, some theses have been developed that show the different models of evaluation of the quality of both face-to-face education and virtual education, but not applied to the Peruvian reality and to postgraduate programs. The present qualitative research develops a system of quality indicators from comparing twenty one (21) quality models from different regions that exist to evaluate virtual programs in different regions: Latin America, Europe, Africa, USA, and that have been proposed or updated in the last 15 years, most of them between 2008 and 2011. This proposal has been validated through surveys of experts of virtual programs. In conclusion it can be indicated that fifteen (15) dimensions or factors have been identified and fifty-six (56) indicators that better allow to evaluate the quality of the graduate programs in virtual modality in Peru.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ciencia y Tecnología El Higo\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ciencia y Tecnología El Higo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17268/rev.cyt.2022.01.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ciencia y Tecnología El Higo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17268/rev.cyt.2022.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

e-learning的快速发展要求模型以同样的方式来评估其质量,因此该领域的研究必须保持不变,有助于提高社会对e-learning质量的看法。虚拟大学的数量越来越多。在这一点上,一些论文显示了面对面教育和虚拟教育质量的不同评估模式,但并不适用于秘鲁的现实和研究生课程。本定性研究通过比较来自不同地区的21个质量模型,开发了一个质量指标体系,这些模型用于评估拉丁美洲、欧洲、非洲和美国等不同地区的虚拟课程,这些模型在过去15年中被提出或更新,其中大部分是在2008年至2011年之间。该建议已通过虚拟程序专家的调查得到验证。总之,可以指出,已经确定了十五(15)个维度或因素,以及五十六(56)个指标,可以更好地评估秘鲁虚拟模式研究生课程的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System of quality indicators to evaluate online postgraduate programs in Perú, 2020
The rapid evolution of e-learning makes necessary for models to evaluate their quality to evolve in the same way, so research in this field must be constant, contributing to improve the perspective of society regarding the quality of e-learning. There is a growing number of virtual universities. On this point, some theses have been developed that show the different models of evaluation of the quality of both face-to-face education and virtual education, but not applied to the Peruvian reality and to postgraduate programs. The present qualitative research develops a system of quality indicators from comparing twenty one (21) quality models from different regions that exist to evaluate virtual programs in different regions: Latin America, Europe, Africa, USA, and that have been proposed or updated in the last 15 years, most of them between 2008 and 2011. This proposal has been validated through surveys of experts of virtual programs. In conclusion it can be indicated that fifteen (15) dimensions or factors have been identified and fifty-six (56) indicators that better allow to evaluate the quality of the graduate programs in virtual modality in Peru.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信