沙特王国:在圣战之锤和伊朗铁砧之间

Q1 Social Sciences
Mark C. Thompson
{"title":"沙特王国:在圣战之锤和伊朗铁砧之间","authors":"Mark C. Thompson","doi":"10.1080/21534764.2019.1625197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persian Gulf Security System”, that describes one win-win scenario. The absence of other suggested scenarios, and the limited list of other scholars’ work, suggests opportunities to focus on problem-solving strategies. Perhaps the focus should shift from substance to process, especially regarding the obvious lack of peaceful dispute-resolution mechanisms, capacity, and mindsets in the region. Chillingly, the author declares that, in this unstable landscape, the use of force rather than negotiation is the least damaging choice among available options (p. 119). The book left this reader particularly concerned about the ability of the younger, more belligerent generation of leaders to handle skillfully the security dilemmas they face, along with sectarianism, extremism, and the human security needs of their citizens. Mismanagement of these issues could easily lead to devastating results for the whole region. The author also acknowledges the importance of human security— so it would have been useful to provide data about issues of human security faced by each Persian Gulf country, including population trends,more demographic and economic data, and a discussion of citizens’ access to jobs, food, housing, and health care. What do these security threats look like in the coming years? While the book is well-written and easy to read, the author uses several similarly named political science concepts that may serve to confuse readers who do not possess the necessary scholarly IR background. These include the concepts of security, insecurity, securitization, security architecture, security complexes, security dilemma, security guarantee, and security paradox. To this reviewer’s mind, this slim volume could also have benefited from further editing to eliminate some of the redundancies in later chapters. Chapter organization seemed to force some of these redundancies. Nonspecialist readers might have wished for more discussion of the origins of some of the theories Kamrava applies, especially the security strategies by which states power balance, hedge, and bandwagon to increase their own security (pp. 34, 40–42, 89–90, 105–08, 116–19). Examples of “collective” or “common security systems” would have helped this reader (pp. 34, 117). In conclusion, Kamrava, a prolific author, provides a fearless examination of the persistent tensions in the most volatile region in the world, along with the security architecture that makes it persistently unstable. One hopes that the author plans to write a new book in which he applies this security analysis to the specific circumstances of the sanctions against Qatar.","PeriodicalId":37102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arabian Studies","volume":"54 1","pages":"118 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Saudi Kingdom: Between the Jihadi Hammer and the Iranian Anvil\",\"authors\":\"Mark C. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21534764.2019.1625197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Persian Gulf Security System”, that describes one win-win scenario. The absence of other suggested scenarios, and the limited list of other scholars’ work, suggests opportunities to focus on problem-solving strategies. Perhaps the focus should shift from substance to process, especially regarding the obvious lack of peaceful dispute-resolution mechanisms, capacity, and mindsets in the region. Chillingly, the author declares that, in this unstable landscape, the use of force rather than negotiation is the least damaging choice among available options (p. 119). The book left this reader particularly concerned about the ability of the younger, more belligerent generation of leaders to handle skillfully the security dilemmas they face, along with sectarianism, extremism, and the human security needs of their citizens. Mismanagement of these issues could easily lead to devastating results for the whole region. The author also acknowledges the importance of human security— so it would have been useful to provide data about issues of human security faced by each Persian Gulf country, including population trends,more demographic and economic data, and a discussion of citizens’ access to jobs, food, housing, and health care. What do these security threats look like in the coming years? While the book is well-written and easy to read, the author uses several similarly named political science concepts that may serve to confuse readers who do not possess the necessary scholarly IR background. These include the concepts of security, insecurity, securitization, security architecture, security complexes, security dilemma, security guarantee, and security paradox. To this reviewer’s mind, this slim volume could also have benefited from further editing to eliminate some of the redundancies in later chapters. Chapter organization seemed to force some of these redundancies. Nonspecialist readers might have wished for more discussion of the origins of some of the theories Kamrava applies, especially the security strategies by which states power balance, hedge, and bandwagon to increase their own security (pp. 34, 40–42, 89–90, 105–08, 116–19). Examples of “collective” or “common security systems” would have helped this reader (pp. 34, 117). In conclusion, Kamrava, a prolific author, provides a fearless examination of the persistent tensions in the most volatile region in the world, along with the security architecture that makes it persistently unstable. One hopes that the author plans to write a new book in which he applies this security analysis to the specific circumstances of the sanctions against Qatar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arabian Studies\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arabian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2019.1625197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arabian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2019.1625197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

波斯湾安全体系”,这描述了一个双赢的局面。没有其他建议的场景,其他学者的工作列表也有限,这表明有机会关注解决问题的策略。也许重点应该从实质转向过程,特别是考虑到该地区明显缺乏和平解决争端的机制、能力和心态。令人不寒而栗的是,作者宣称,在这种不稳定的情况下,使用武力而不是谈判是现有选择中危害最小的选择(第119页)。这本书让读者特别关注年轻的、更好斗的一代领导人是否有能力巧妙地处理他们所面临的安全困境,以及宗派主义、极端主义和公民的人类安全需求。这些问题管理不善很容易给整个地区带来毁灭性的后果。提交人也承认人的安全的重要性——因此,提供关于每个波斯湾国家所面临的人的安全问题的数据,包括人口趋势、更多的人口和经济数据,以及关于公民获得工作、食物、住房和医疗保健的讨论,将是有益的。未来几年这些安全威胁会是什么样子?虽然这本书写得很好,易于阅读,但作者使用了几个类似的政治科学概念,可能会使没有必要的学术IR背景的读者感到困惑。包括安全、不安全、证券化、安全架构、安全综合体、安全困境、安全保障、安全悖论等概念。在这个审稿人看来,这本薄薄的书也可以从进一步的编辑中受益,以消除后面章节中的一些冗余。分会的组织似乎迫使一些人冗余。非专业读者可能希望更多地讨论Kamrava所应用的一些理论的起源,特别是国家权力平衡、对冲和从众以增加自身安全的安全策略(第34页、40-42页、89-90页、105-08页、116-19页)。“集体”或“共同安全系统”的例子会对读者有所帮助(第34、117页)。总之,卡姆拉瓦是一位多产的作家,他大胆地审视了世界上最不稳定地区持续存在的紧张局势,以及导致该地区持续不稳定的安全架构。人们希望作者计划写一本新书,将这种安全分析应用于对卡塔尔制裁的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Saudi Kingdom: Between the Jihadi Hammer and the Iranian Anvil
Persian Gulf Security System”, that describes one win-win scenario. The absence of other suggested scenarios, and the limited list of other scholars’ work, suggests opportunities to focus on problem-solving strategies. Perhaps the focus should shift from substance to process, especially regarding the obvious lack of peaceful dispute-resolution mechanisms, capacity, and mindsets in the region. Chillingly, the author declares that, in this unstable landscape, the use of force rather than negotiation is the least damaging choice among available options (p. 119). The book left this reader particularly concerned about the ability of the younger, more belligerent generation of leaders to handle skillfully the security dilemmas they face, along with sectarianism, extremism, and the human security needs of their citizens. Mismanagement of these issues could easily lead to devastating results for the whole region. The author also acknowledges the importance of human security— so it would have been useful to provide data about issues of human security faced by each Persian Gulf country, including population trends,more demographic and economic data, and a discussion of citizens’ access to jobs, food, housing, and health care. What do these security threats look like in the coming years? While the book is well-written and easy to read, the author uses several similarly named political science concepts that may serve to confuse readers who do not possess the necessary scholarly IR background. These include the concepts of security, insecurity, securitization, security architecture, security complexes, security dilemma, security guarantee, and security paradox. To this reviewer’s mind, this slim volume could also have benefited from further editing to eliminate some of the redundancies in later chapters. Chapter organization seemed to force some of these redundancies. Nonspecialist readers might have wished for more discussion of the origins of some of the theories Kamrava applies, especially the security strategies by which states power balance, hedge, and bandwagon to increase their own security (pp. 34, 40–42, 89–90, 105–08, 116–19). Examples of “collective” or “common security systems” would have helped this reader (pp. 34, 117). In conclusion, Kamrava, a prolific author, provides a fearless examination of the persistent tensions in the most volatile region in the world, along with the security architecture that makes it persistently unstable. One hopes that the author plans to write a new book in which he applies this security analysis to the specific circumstances of the sanctions against Qatar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arabian Studies
Journal of Arabian Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信