建构思想:政治本体论的三种范式

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
R. Esposito, Mariaenrica Giannuzzi
{"title":"建构思想:政治本体论的三种范式","authors":"R. Esposito, Mariaenrica Giannuzzi","doi":"10.1353/cul.2022.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The essay identifies three ontological-political paradigms that are prominent in contemporary debate: the first, derived from Heidegger, is \"destituent\"; the second, elaborated by Deleuze, is \"constituent\"; and the third, which refers above all to the work of Claude Lefort, is \"instituting.\" While the first two, in the forms they have assumed in contemporary philosophy, give rise to a politically ineffective outcome, the third opens up a new space of thought for political praxis.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instituting Thought: Three Paradigms of Political Ontology\",\"authors\":\"R. Esposito, Mariaenrica Giannuzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cul.2022.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The essay identifies three ontological-political paradigms that are prominent in contemporary debate: the first, derived from Heidegger, is \\\"destituent\\\"; the second, elaborated by Deleuze, is \\\"constituent\\\"; and the third, which refers above all to the work of Claude Lefort, is \\\"instituting.\\\" While the first two, in the forms they have assumed in contemporary philosophy, give rise to a politically ineffective outcome, the third opens up a new space of thought for political praxis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Critique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2022.0016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2022.0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文确定了当代辩论中突出的三种本体论-政治范式:第一种源于海德格尔的“贫困”范式;德勒兹阐述的第二个概念是“构成”;第三个词,主要指的是克劳德·勒福特的作品,是“制度化”。前两者以其在当代哲学中的表现形式导致了政治上无效的结果,而第三种则为政治实践开辟了新的思想空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instituting Thought: Three Paradigms of Political Ontology
Abstract:The essay identifies three ontological-political paradigms that are prominent in contemporary debate: the first, derived from Heidegger, is "destituent"; the second, elaborated by Deleuze, is "constituent"; and the third, which refers above all to the work of Claude Lefort, is "instituting." While the first two, in the forms they have assumed in contemporary philosophy, give rise to a politically ineffective outcome, the third opens up a new space of thought for political praxis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Critique
Cultural Critique Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信