非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)用于房颤和瓣膜性心脏病的卒中预防-系统综述

D. Chua, S. Tkachuk
{"title":"非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)用于房颤和瓣膜性心脏病的卒中预防-系统综述","authors":"D. Chua, S. Tkachuk","doi":"10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2018.05.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are commonly used for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but their efficacy and safety in patients with underlying valvular heart disease (VHD) is unknown. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov was performed with the terms direct oral antiocoagulants, new oral anticoagulants, DOAC, NOAC, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, valvular heart disease, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid stenosis, tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary regurgitation. Only clinical studies with clinical endpoints that compared NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF and identified VHD were included. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were retrieved based on our search criteria. Subgroup analysis of the landmark trials comparing a NOAC to warfarin in AF patients with underlying VHD demonstrated that NOACs had similar or superior efficacy in stroke prevention compared to warfarin. The risk of bleeding with NOACs compared to warfarin in these patients yielded inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, NOACs provide similar or superior stroke reduction compared to warfarin in patients with AF and VHD, especially in aortic valve disease and mitral regurgitation. The rate of major bleeding between NOACs and warfarin in this patient population is unclear.","PeriodicalId":92802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","volume":"14 1","pages":"729-733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease – Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"D. Chua, S. Tkachuk\",\"doi\":\"10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2018.05.148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are commonly used for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but their efficacy and safety in patients with underlying valvular heart disease (VHD) is unknown. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov was performed with the terms direct oral antiocoagulants, new oral anticoagulants, DOAC, NOAC, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, valvular heart disease, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid stenosis, tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary regurgitation. Only clinical studies with clinical endpoints that compared NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF and identified VHD were included. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were retrieved based on our search criteria. Subgroup analysis of the landmark trials comparing a NOAC to warfarin in AF patients with underlying VHD demonstrated that NOACs had similar or superior efficacy in stroke prevention compared to warfarin. The risk of bleeding with NOACs compared to warfarin in these patients yielded inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, NOACs provide similar or superior stroke reduction compared to warfarin in patients with AF and VHD, especially in aortic valve disease and mitral regurgitation. The rate of major bleeding between NOACs and warfarin in this patient population is unclear.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"729-733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2018.05.148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2018.05.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)通常用于房颤(AF)患者的卒中预防,但其在潜在瓣膜性心脏病(VHD)患者中的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。方法:在MEDLINE、CENTRAL、Embase、clinicaltrials.gov网站上检索直接口服抗凝剂、新型口服抗凝剂、DOAC、NOAC、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群、瓣膜性心脏病、主动脉瓣狭窄、主动脉瓣反流、二尖瓣反流、三尖瓣狭窄、三尖瓣反流、肺狭窄和肺反流。仅纳入具有临床终点的临床研究,比较NOACs与华法林在房颤和VHD患者中的疗效。结果:根据我们的检索标准检索到4项临床研究。对具有里程碑意义的试验进行亚组分析,比较NOAC和华法林在房颤合并潜在VHD患者中预防卒中的疗效,NOAC与华法林相似或优于华法林。与华法林相比,NOACs患者的出血风险不一致。结论:根据现有证据,与华法林相比,NOACs对房颤和VHD患者的卒中减少效果相似或更好,特别是在主动脉瓣疾病和二尖瓣反流方面。在该患者群体中,NOACs和华法林之间的大出血率尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease – Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are commonly used for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but their efficacy and safety in patients with underlying valvular heart disease (VHD) is unknown. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov was performed with the terms direct oral antiocoagulants, new oral anticoagulants, DOAC, NOAC, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, valvular heart disease, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid stenosis, tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary regurgitation. Only clinical studies with clinical endpoints that compared NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF and identified VHD were included. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were retrieved based on our search criteria. Subgroup analysis of the landmark trials comparing a NOAC to warfarin in AF patients with underlying VHD demonstrated that NOACs had similar or superior efficacy in stroke prevention compared to warfarin. The risk of bleeding with NOACs compared to warfarin in these patients yielded inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, NOACs provide similar or superior stroke reduction compared to warfarin in patients with AF and VHD, especially in aortic valve disease and mitral regurgitation. The rate of major bleeding between NOACs and warfarin in this patient population is unclear.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信