微创修复泪下小管撕裂伤的疗效观察

Lei Zaizhi
{"title":"微创修复泪下小管撕裂伤的疗效观察","authors":"Lei Zaizhi","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive repair and anastomosis of inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration. \n \n \nMethods \nThe data of 83 eyes of 83 patients with inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration in this hospital from Dec. 2015 to Apr. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included 29 cases in the observation group and 54 cases in the control group. All cases performed surgery under the operating microscope, and the broken end of the nasal side were directly probed along the wound edge during operation. The control group adopted the ordinary anastomosis method of dual anterograde intubation with silicone stent. The observation group adopted minimally invasive anastomosis method. The lacrimal duct stent was placed into the lacrimal duct to anastomose the inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration. All cases were followed up for 6 months. \n \n \nResults \nThe operation time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the two groups (P=0.807). The incidence rate of puncta slitting in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group (P=0.046). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe minimally invasive repair for inferior lacrimal canaliculus rupture does not cause secondary injury, and the efficacy is definite. \n \n \nKey words: \nLaceration, lacrimal canaliculus; Repair, minimally invasive; Efficacy","PeriodicalId":10126,"journal":{"name":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of minimally invasive repair for laceration of inferior lacrimal canaliculus\",\"authors\":\"Lei Zaizhi\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive repair and anastomosis of inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe data of 83 eyes of 83 patients with inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration in this hospital from Dec. 2015 to Apr. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included 29 cases in the observation group and 54 cases in the control group. All cases performed surgery under the operating microscope, and the broken end of the nasal side were directly probed along the wound edge during operation. The control group adopted the ordinary anastomosis method of dual anterograde intubation with silicone stent. The observation group adopted minimally invasive anastomosis method. The lacrimal duct stent was placed into the lacrimal duct to anastomose the inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration. All cases were followed up for 6 months. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe operation time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the two groups (P=0.807). The incidence rate of puncta slitting in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group (P=0.046). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThe minimally invasive repair for inferior lacrimal canaliculus rupture does not cause secondary injury, and the efficacy is definite. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nLaceration, lacrimal canaliculus; Repair, minimally invasive; Efficacy\",\"PeriodicalId\":10126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.12.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.12.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨下泪小管撕裂伤微创修复吻合的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年12月至2018年4月该院83例泪下小管撕裂患者83只眼的资料。观察组29例,对照组54例。所有病例均在手术显微镜下进行手术,术中沿创口边缘直接探查鼻侧断端。对照组采用硅胶支架双顺行插管的普通吻合方法。观察组采用微创吻合法。将泪管支架置入泪管,吻合下泪小管裂口。所有病例均随访6个月。结果观察组手术时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。两组的回收率差异无统计学意义(P=0.807)。观察组点状切口发生率显著低于对照组(P=0.046)。结论微创修复下泪小管破裂无继发性损伤,疗效确切。关键词:撕裂伤;泪小管;修复,微创;功效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of minimally invasive repair for laceration of inferior lacrimal canaliculus
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive repair and anastomosis of inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration. Methods The data of 83 eyes of 83 patients with inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration in this hospital from Dec. 2015 to Apr. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included 29 cases in the observation group and 54 cases in the control group. All cases performed surgery under the operating microscope, and the broken end of the nasal side were directly probed along the wound edge during operation. The control group adopted the ordinary anastomosis method of dual anterograde intubation with silicone stent. The observation group adopted minimally invasive anastomosis method. The lacrimal duct stent was placed into the lacrimal duct to anastomose the inferior lacrimal canaliculus laceration. All cases were followed up for 6 months. Results The operation time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the two groups (P=0.807). The incidence rate of puncta slitting in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group (P=0.046). Conclusion The minimally invasive repair for inferior lacrimal canaliculus rupture does not cause secondary injury, and the efficacy is definite. Key words: Laceration, lacrimal canaliculus; Repair, minimally invasive; Efficacy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8728
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信