砖块还是点击?消费者对传统商店和网上商店的态度

Jacqueline J. Kacen , James D. Hess , Wei-Yu Kevin Chiang
{"title":"砖块还是点击?消费者对传统商店和网上商店的态度","authors":"Jacqueline J. Kacen ,&nbsp;James D. Hess ,&nbsp;Wei-Yu Kevin Chiang","doi":"10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70003-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining what consumers value, and how online stores compare to traditional stores on valued attributes is a necessary first step in understanding the relative benefits of e-commerce. In this paper, we measure consumers’ valuation of online stores compared to traditional stores by measuring the consumers’ perceptions of the performance of online stores on 18 attributes, as well as the importance of each of those attributes. These individual perceptions and preferences from a web-based and paper-based survey of 224 shoppers are combined in a self-explicated multi-attribute attitude model. The findings show that, overall, all product categories in our survey of online stores are less acceptable than traditional stores. Online stores are perceived as having competitive disadvantages with respect to shipping and handling charges, exchange/refund policy for returns, providing an interesting social or family experience, helpfulness of salespeople, post-purchase service, and uncertainty about getting the right item. The advantages that online stores have in areas such as brand-selection/variety and ease of browsing do not entirely overcome the disadvantages listed above.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70003-3","citationCount":"213","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bricks or Clicks? Consumer Attitudes toward Traditional Stores and Online Stores\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline J. Kacen ,&nbsp;James D. Hess ,&nbsp;Wei-Yu Kevin Chiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70003-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Determining what consumers value, and how online stores compare to traditional stores on valued attributes is a necessary first step in understanding the relative benefits of e-commerce. In this paper, we measure consumers’ valuation of online stores compared to traditional stores by measuring the consumers’ perceptions of the performance of online stores on 18 attributes, as well as the importance of each of those attributes. These individual perceptions and preferences from a web-based and paper-based survey of 224 shoppers are combined in a self-explicated multi-attribute attitude model. The findings show that, overall, all product categories in our survey of online stores are less acceptable than traditional stores. Online stores are perceived as having competitive disadvantages with respect to shipping and handling charges, exchange/refund policy for returns, providing an interesting social or family experience, helpfulness of salespeople, post-purchase service, and uncertainty about getting the right item. The advantages that online stores have in areas such as brand-selection/variety and ease of browsing do not entirely overcome the disadvantages listed above.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Economics and Management Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 12-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70003-3\",\"citationCount\":\"213\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Economics and Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340154013700033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economics and Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340154013700033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 213

摘要

确定消费者的价值,以及在线商店与传统商店在价值属性上的比较,是了解电子商务相对优势的必要第一步。在本文中,我们通过衡量消费者对在线商店在18个属性上的表现的看法,以及每个属性的重要性,来衡量消费者对在线商店与传统商店的评价。这些个人的看法和偏好从基于网络和基于纸张的224购物者的调查结合在一个自我说明的多属性态度模型。调查结果表明,总体而言,我们调查的所有在线商店产品类别都不如传统商店可接受。人们认为在线商店在运输和处理费用、退货的交换/退款政策、提供有趣的社交或家庭体验、销售人员的帮助、售后服务以及是否买到正确商品的不确定性等方面具有竞争劣势。网上商店在品牌选择/品种和浏览方便等方面的优势并不能完全克服上面列出的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bricks or Clicks? Consumer Attitudes toward Traditional Stores and Online Stores

Determining what consumers value, and how online stores compare to traditional stores on valued attributes is a necessary first step in understanding the relative benefits of e-commerce. In this paper, we measure consumers’ valuation of online stores compared to traditional stores by measuring the consumers’ perceptions of the performance of online stores on 18 attributes, as well as the importance of each of those attributes. These individual perceptions and preferences from a web-based and paper-based survey of 224 shoppers are combined in a self-explicated multi-attribute attitude model. The findings show that, overall, all product categories in our survey of online stores are less acceptable than traditional stores. Online stores are perceived as having competitive disadvantages with respect to shipping and handling charges, exchange/refund policy for returns, providing an interesting social or family experience, helpfulness of salespeople, post-purchase service, and uncertainty about getting the right item. The advantages that online stores have in areas such as brand-selection/variety and ease of browsing do not entirely overcome the disadvantages listed above.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信