{"title":"毒品持有，智利土著居民，以及文化防御","authors":"Rodrigo Cespedes","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-96.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines two decisions in which the legal dispute was focused on whether it was lawful to possess coca leaves by indigenous peoples to practice rituals according to their traditional customs. Both ILO Convention 169 (ILO C169) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were paramount in justifying a cultural defence.","PeriodicalId":36157,"journal":{"name":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DRUG POSSESSION, CHILEAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, AND CULTURAL DEFENSES\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Cespedes\",\"doi\":\"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-96.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines two decisions in which the legal dispute was focused on whether it was lawful to possess coca leaves by indigenous peoples to practice rituals according to their traditional customs. Both ILO Convention 169 (ILO C169) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were paramount in justifying a cultural defence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-96.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-96.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
DRUG POSSESSION, CHILEAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, AND CULTURAL DEFENSES
This paper examines two decisions in which the legal dispute was focused on whether it was lawful to possess coca leaves by indigenous peoples to practice rituals according to their traditional customs. Both ILO Convention 169 (ILO C169) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were paramount in justifying a cultural defence.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
