含左炔诺孕酮的宫内节育器置入期间妇科医生和患者体验、焦虑和疼痛感知的评价ELA 52研究

{"title":"含左炔诺孕酮的宫内节育器置入期间妇科医生和患者体验、焦虑和疼痛感知的评价ELA 52研究","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jgrm.05.02.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To characterize patient’s and obstetricians-gynecologist’s (ob-gyns) experience in insertion of a 52 mg levonorgestrel‐ releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD). Materials and Methods: A non-interventional, prospective and multicentric study was conducted in 583 patient of reproductive age who had insertion of Levosert® following routine clinical practice. Questionnaires were used to collect information on obgyns’ and patient’s experiences associated with IUD insertion. Pain and anxiety were rated, and possible predictors such as age, parity were evaluated. Results: Before IUD insertion, 50.8% of the participants felt minimal anxiousness and 44.9% predicted moderate pain. Twohundred and sixteen (37.0%) patient reported mild pain with insertion and 227 (38.9%) reported moderate pain. Ob-gyns were aware of the patient’s insertion pain experience and 84.2% considered LNG-IUD insertion “Easy” or “Very Easy”. The vast majority of patient (88.2%) were also “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with LNG-IUD insertion, considering the procedure less or at least equally painful as they expected. Conclusions: Given the strong link between anxiety and expected pain and the lack pain management strategies effectiveness, the implementation of interventions that may mitigate both anxiety and pain during IUD insertion are crucial. LNG-IUD is associated with high satisfaction rates by patient and considered easy to apply by ob-gyns.","PeriodicalId":93778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Gynecologist’s and Patient’s Experience, Anxiety and Pain Perception During Intrauterine Device Insertion Containing Levonorgestrel ELA 52 Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jgrm.05.02.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To characterize patient’s and obstetricians-gynecologist’s (ob-gyns) experience in insertion of a 52 mg levonorgestrel‐ releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD). Materials and Methods: A non-interventional, prospective and multicentric study was conducted in 583 patient of reproductive age who had insertion of Levosert® following routine clinical practice. Questionnaires were used to collect information on obgyns’ and patient’s experiences associated with IUD insertion. Pain and anxiety were rated, and possible predictors such as age, parity were evaluated. Results: Before IUD insertion, 50.8% of the participants felt minimal anxiousness and 44.9% predicted moderate pain. Twohundred and sixteen (37.0%) patient reported mild pain with insertion and 227 (38.9%) reported moderate pain. Ob-gyns were aware of the patient’s insertion pain experience and 84.2% considered LNG-IUD insertion “Easy” or “Very Easy”. The vast majority of patient (88.2%) were also “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with LNG-IUD insertion, considering the procedure less or at least equally painful as they expected. Conclusions: Given the strong link between anxiety and expected pain and the lack pain management strategies effectiveness, the implementation of interventions that may mitigate both anxiety and pain during IUD insertion are crucial. LNG-IUD is associated with high satisfaction rates by patient and considered easy to apply by ob-gyns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.05.02.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.05.02.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨患者和妇产科医生在植入52 mg左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)时的经验。材料与方法:在583例育龄患者中进行了一项非介入性、前瞻性和多中心研究,这些患者在常规临床实践中植入了左伏赛特®。调查问卷用于收集与宫内节育器插入有关的产科医生和患者的经验信息。对疼痛和焦虑进行评分,并对年龄、胎次等可能的预测因素进行评估。结果:在植入节育器前,50.8%的参与者感到轻微焦虑,44.9%的参与者预测中度疼痛。216例(37.0%)患者报告插入时轻度疼痛,227例(38.9%)报告中度疼痛。84.2%的妇产科医生认为LNG-IUD插入“容易”或“非常容易”。绝大多数患者(88.2%)也对LNG-IUD植入感到“满意”或“非常满意”,认为手术比预期的要少或至少同样痛苦。结论:考虑到焦虑和预期疼痛之间的紧密联系,以及缺乏有效的疼痛管理策略,实施可能减轻宫内节育器插入期间焦虑和疼痛的干预措施至关重要。LNG-IUD患者满意率高,且易于应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Gynecologist’s and Patient’s Experience, Anxiety and Pain Perception During Intrauterine Device Insertion Containing Levonorgestrel ELA 52 Study
Objective: To characterize patient’s and obstetricians-gynecologist’s (ob-gyns) experience in insertion of a 52 mg levonorgestrel‐ releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD). Materials and Methods: A non-interventional, prospective and multicentric study was conducted in 583 patient of reproductive age who had insertion of Levosert® following routine clinical practice. Questionnaires were used to collect information on obgyns’ and patient’s experiences associated with IUD insertion. Pain and anxiety were rated, and possible predictors such as age, parity were evaluated. Results: Before IUD insertion, 50.8% of the participants felt minimal anxiousness and 44.9% predicted moderate pain. Twohundred and sixteen (37.0%) patient reported mild pain with insertion and 227 (38.9%) reported moderate pain. Ob-gyns were aware of the patient’s insertion pain experience and 84.2% considered LNG-IUD insertion “Easy” or “Very Easy”. The vast majority of patient (88.2%) were also “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with LNG-IUD insertion, considering the procedure less or at least equally painful as they expected. Conclusions: Given the strong link between anxiety and expected pain and the lack pain management strategies effectiveness, the implementation of interventions that may mitigate both anxiety and pain during IUD insertion are crucial. LNG-IUD is associated with high satisfaction rates by patient and considered easy to apply by ob-gyns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信