新冠肺炎大流行过程对土耳其天然气期货交易波动效应的实证分析

Kudbeddin Şeker
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行过程对土耳其天然气期货交易波动效应的实证分析","authors":"Kudbeddin Şeker","doi":"10.38004/sobad.1184594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the volatility movements in natural gas returns, which is one of the financial investment instruments in futures markets, before and after the Covid-19 pandemic, using GARCH family models. For this purpose, daily data from 30.08.2017 to 10.03.2020 before the Covid-19 Pandemic, and daily data from 11.03.2020 to 21.09.2021 after the Covid-19 Pandemic were used. The return on natural gas futures before the Covid-19 Pandemic was expressed as RLNPO and the return on natural gas futures after the Covid-19 Pandemic was expressed as RLNPS. For RLNPO, TGARCH was determined as the most suitable volatility model according to Schwarz Information Criteria, and EGARCH was determined as the most suitable volatility model for RLNPS. As a result of these analyzes, it has been seen that natural gas futures returns can be explained by asymmetric volatility models before and after the Covid-19 Pandemic, but there is no leverage effect as a result of asymmetric volatility, and positive shock asymmetries have a greater effect on volatility. The asymmetric effect tends to decrease in the post-Covid-19 Pandemic period.","PeriodicalId":32495,"journal":{"name":"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"29 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE VOLATILITY EFFECT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PROCESS ON NATURAL GAS FUTURE TRANSACTIONS IN TURKEY\",\"authors\":\"Kudbeddin Şeker\",\"doi\":\"10.38004/sobad.1184594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to investigate the volatility movements in natural gas returns, which is one of the financial investment instruments in futures markets, before and after the Covid-19 pandemic, using GARCH family models. For this purpose, daily data from 30.08.2017 to 10.03.2020 before the Covid-19 Pandemic, and daily data from 11.03.2020 to 21.09.2021 after the Covid-19 Pandemic were used. The return on natural gas futures before the Covid-19 Pandemic was expressed as RLNPO and the return on natural gas futures after the Covid-19 Pandemic was expressed as RLNPS. For RLNPO, TGARCH was determined as the most suitable volatility model according to Schwarz Information Criteria, and EGARCH was determined as the most suitable volatility model for RLNPS. As a result of these analyzes, it has been seen that natural gas futures returns can be explained by asymmetric volatility models before and after the Covid-19 Pandemic, but there is no leverage effect as a result of asymmetric volatility, and positive shock asymmetries have a greater effect on volatility. The asymmetric effect tends to decrease in the post-Covid-19 Pandemic period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"29 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.1184594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.1184594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用GARCH家族模型研究2019冠状病毒病大流行前后期货市场金融投资工具之一天然气收益的波动走势。为此,使用了2019冠状病毒病大流行前2017年8月30日至2020年3月10日的每日数据,以及2019冠状病毒病大流行后2020年3月11日至2021年9月21日的每日数据。新冠肺炎疫情前天然气期货收益率用RLNPO表示,疫情后天然气期货收益率用RLNPS表示。对于RLNPO,根据Schwarz信息准则确定TGARCH为最合适的波动率模型,EGARCH为RLNPS最合适的波动率模型。通过分析发现,新冠肺炎疫情前后天然气期货收益可以用不对称波动率模型解释,但不存在不对称波动率导致的杠杆效应,正冲击不对称对波动率的影响更大。在covid -19大流行后时期,这种不对称效应趋于减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE VOLATILITY EFFECT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PROCESS ON NATURAL GAS FUTURE TRANSACTIONS IN TURKEY
The aim of this study is to investigate the volatility movements in natural gas returns, which is one of the financial investment instruments in futures markets, before and after the Covid-19 pandemic, using GARCH family models. For this purpose, daily data from 30.08.2017 to 10.03.2020 before the Covid-19 Pandemic, and daily data from 11.03.2020 to 21.09.2021 after the Covid-19 Pandemic were used. The return on natural gas futures before the Covid-19 Pandemic was expressed as RLNPO and the return on natural gas futures after the Covid-19 Pandemic was expressed as RLNPS. For RLNPO, TGARCH was determined as the most suitable volatility model according to Schwarz Information Criteria, and EGARCH was determined as the most suitable volatility model for RLNPS. As a result of these analyzes, it has been seen that natural gas futures returns can be explained by asymmetric volatility models before and after the Covid-19 Pandemic, but there is no leverage effect as a result of asymmetric volatility, and positive shock asymmetries have a greater effect on volatility. The asymmetric effect tends to decrease in the post-Covid-19 Pandemic period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信