Care-Dependent窗帘布

A. Chen, Yusha Chen, Xian Xu
{"title":"Care-Dependent窗帘布","authors":"A. Chen, Yusha Chen, Xian Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3880661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the gradual deepening of aging, the medical and pension problems of the half-disabled and disabled elderly will become increasingly prominent. Policymakers, academics, and the public at large shed extensive concerns about the cost of aging societies. Although long-term care (LTC) insurance comes up as one of the solutions, private LTC does not perform well in the market. The combination of tontines with long-term care contingency stands out as an alternative to attract participants. In this article, we propose two ways of designing the care-dependent tontines: (i) all the insured members are considered to be in one pool; (ii) at each time t, we allocate them into two groups: the healthy and the severely sick. We find out the optimal payment structures of the care-dependent tontine as well as the care-dependent annuity that maximize the policyholder’s expected lifetime utility. Based on data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we theoretically and numerically compare the different care-dependent products in consideration with an actuarially fair premium. Results imply that the care-dependent annuity is the most attractive one. However, when we take account of the risk charges to further compare the products, we find that both care-dependent tontines present as better choices of policyholders in comparison with care-dependent annuities. Moreover, two-pool care-dependent tontines draw attractions to the policyholder with a smaller risk aversion coefficient, while one-pool care-dependent tontines are more appealing to the more risk-averse policyholders.","PeriodicalId":82443,"journal":{"name":"Real property, probate, and trust journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care-Dependent Tontines\",\"authors\":\"A. Chen, Yusha Chen, Xian Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3880661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the gradual deepening of aging, the medical and pension problems of the half-disabled and disabled elderly will become increasingly prominent. Policymakers, academics, and the public at large shed extensive concerns about the cost of aging societies. Although long-term care (LTC) insurance comes up as one of the solutions, private LTC does not perform well in the market. The combination of tontines with long-term care contingency stands out as an alternative to attract participants. In this article, we propose two ways of designing the care-dependent tontines: (i) all the insured members are considered to be in one pool; (ii) at each time t, we allocate them into two groups: the healthy and the severely sick. We find out the optimal payment structures of the care-dependent tontine as well as the care-dependent annuity that maximize the policyholder’s expected lifetime utility. Based on data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we theoretically and numerically compare the different care-dependent products in consideration with an actuarially fair premium. Results imply that the care-dependent annuity is the most attractive one. However, when we take account of the risk charges to further compare the products, we find that both care-dependent tontines present as better choices of policyholders in comparison with care-dependent annuities. Moreover, two-pool care-dependent tontines draw attractions to the policyholder with a smaller risk aversion coefficient, while one-pool care-dependent tontines are more appealing to the more risk-averse policyholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Real property, probate, and trust journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Real property, probate, and trust journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real property, probate, and trust journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着老龄化程度的逐渐加深,半残疾和残疾老年人的医疗和养老问题将日益突出。政策制定者、学者和广大公众都对老龄化社会的成本表示了广泛的担忧。尽管长期护理(LTC)保险作为解决方案之一出现,但私人LTC在市场上的表现并不好。tontines与长期护理应急的结合作为吸引参与者的另一种选择脱颖而出。在本文中,我们提出了两种方法来设计护理依赖tonines:(i)所有被保险人被认为在一个池中;(ii)在每个时间t,我们将他们分为两组:健康组和重病组。我们找到了护理依赖型年金和护理依赖型年金的最优支付结构,使投保人的预期寿命效用最大化。基于中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的数据,我们在理论上和数值上比较了考虑到保险精算公平的不同护理依赖产品。结果表明,护理依赖型年金是最具吸引力的年金。然而,当我们考虑风险收费来进一步比较产品时,我们发现与护理依赖型年金相比,护理依赖型年金是投保人更好的选择。此外,两池护理依赖型保单对风险厌恶系数较小的投保人具有吸引力,而一池护理依赖型保单对风险厌恶系数较高的投保人更具吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Care-Dependent Tontines
With the gradual deepening of aging, the medical and pension problems of the half-disabled and disabled elderly will become increasingly prominent. Policymakers, academics, and the public at large shed extensive concerns about the cost of aging societies. Although long-term care (LTC) insurance comes up as one of the solutions, private LTC does not perform well in the market. The combination of tontines with long-term care contingency stands out as an alternative to attract participants. In this article, we propose two ways of designing the care-dependent tontines: (i) all the insured members are considered to be in one pool; (ii) at each time t, we allocate them into two groups: the healthy and the severely sick. We find out the optimal payment structures of the care-dependent tontine as well as the care-dependent annuity that maximize the policyholder’s expected lifetime utility. Based on data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we theoretically and numerically compare the different care-dependent products in consideration with an actuarially fair premium. Results imply that the care-dependent annuity is the most attractive one. However, when we take account of the risk charges to further compare the products, we find that both care-dependent tontines present as better choices of policyholders in comparison with care-dependent annuities. Moreover, two-pool care-dependent tontines draw attractions to the policyholder with a smaller risk aversion coefficient, while one-pool care-dependent tontines are more appealing to the more risk-averse policyholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信