{"title":"Care-Dependent窗帘布","authors":"A. Chen, Yusha Chen, Xian Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3880661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the gradual deepening of aging, the medical and pension problems of the half-disabled and disabled elderly will become increasingly prominent. Policymakers, academics, and the public at large shed extensive concerns about the cost of aging societies. Although long-term care (LTC) insurance comes up as one of the solutions, private LTC does not perform well in the market. The combination of tontines with long-term care contingency stands out as an alternative to attract participants. In this article, we propose two ways of designing the care-dependent tontines: (i) all the insured members are considered to be in one pool; (ii) at each time t, we allocate them into two groups: the healthy and the severely sick. We find out the optimal payment structures of the care-dependent tontine as well as the care-dependent annuity that maximize the policyholder’s expected lifetime utility. Based on data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we theoretically and numerically compare the different care-dependent products in consideration with an actuarially fair premium. Results imply that the care-dependent annuity is the most attractive one. However, when we take account of the risk charges to further compare the products, we find that both care-dependent tontines present as better choices of policyholders in comparison with care-dependent annuities. Moreover, two-pool care-dependent tontines draw attractions to the policyholder with a smaller risk aversion coefficient, while one-pool care-dependent tontines are more appealing to the more risk-averse policyholders.","PeriodicalId":82443,"journal":{"name":"Real property, probate, and trust journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care-Dependent Tontines\",\"authors\":\"A. Chen, Yusha Chen, Xian Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3880661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the gradual deepening of aging, the medical and pension problems of the half-disabled and disabled elderly will become increasingly prominent. Policymakers, academics, and the public at large shed extensive concerns about the cost of aging societies. Although long-term care (LTC) insurance comes up as one of the solutions, private LTC does not perform well in the market. The combination of tontines with long-term care contingency stands out as an alternative to attract participants. In this article, we propose two ways of designing the care-dependent tontines: (i) all the insured members are considered to be in one pool; (ii) at each time t, we allocate them into two groups: the healthy and the severely sick. We find out the optimal payment structures of the care-dependent tontine as well as the care-dependent annuity that maximize the policyholder’s expected lifetime utility. Based on data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we theoretically and numerically compare the different care-dependent products in consideration with an actuarially fair premium. Results imply that the care-dependent annuity is the most attractive one. However, when we take account of the risk charges to further compare the products, we find that both care-dependent tontines present as better choices of policyholders in comparison with care-dependent annuities. Moreover, two-pool care-dependent tontines draw attractions to the policyholder with a smaller risk aversion coefficient, while one-pool care-dependent tontines are more appealing to the more risk-averse policyholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Real property, probate, and trust journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Real property, probate, and trust journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real property, probate, and trust journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
With the gradual deepening of aging, the medical and pension problems of the half-disabled and disabled elderly will become increasingly prominent. Policymakers, academics, and the public at large shed extensive concerns about the cost of aging societies. Although long-term care (LTC) insurance comes up as one of the solutions, private LTC does not perform well in the market. The combination of tontines with long-term care contingency stands out as an alternative to attract participants. In this article, we propose two ways of designing the care-dependent tontines: (i) all the insured members are considered to be in one pool; (ii) at each time t, we allocate them into two groups: the healthy and the severely sick. We find out the optimal payment structures of the care-dependent tontine as well as the care-dependent annuity that maximize the policyholder’s expected lifetime utility. Based on data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we theoretically and numerically compare the different care-dependent products in consideration with an actuarially fair premium. Results imply that the care-dependent annuity is the most attractive one. However, when we take account of the risk charges to further compare the products, we find that both care-dependent tontines present as better choices of policyholders in comparison with care-dependent annuities. Moreover, two-pool care-dependent tontines draw attractions to the policyholder with a smaller risk aversion coefficient, while one-pool care-dependent tontines are more appealing to the more risk-averse policyholders.