木材采伐过程中补充工作时间的标准化

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Krzysztof Kamiński, G. Szewczyk, J. Kocel
{"title":"木材采伐过程中补充工作时间的标准化","authors":"Krzysztof Kamiński, G. Szewczyk, J. Kocel","doi":"10.2478/ffp-2020-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the essential elements of work technology assessment is task performance time. In the working day structure, production times are crucial; however, under certain conditions, complementary work times can have a share of up to 30%. Accurate determination of the time structure of a work shift is very time consuming and requires time measurements using the methods of cumulative timing or snapshot observations. For this reason, the overall share of complementary work times in a work shift is usually estimated roughly, equally for all timber harvesting conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of selected working environment factors on the share of complementary work times in a work shift, in technologies on the manual-machine and the machine levels. The analyses were carried out in 33 forest districts of the Regional Directorate of State Forests in Wrocław. Among forest contractors, surveys were carried out to analyse the time structure of a working day. For each forest district, analyses of environmental factors potentially relevant to the share of complementary work times in a work shift were carried out; these included field features, dispersion of stands, features of timber, area accessibility. The total share of complementary work times in the machine-level technology variant amounted to approx. 40% and was higher than the manual-machine technological variant, where this share amounted to approx. 35%. The models developed for standardization of the share of variability of complementary work times, in the case of the manual-machine technology level, took into account the share of timber assortments with the length of over 2.5 m as well as the share of upland and mountain sites. In the case of timber harvesting at the machine technology level, the standardization model included as significant the factors such as the share of coniferous forest sites, the number of forest complexes with an area of over 100 hectares, and the total length of roads. Therefore, the above features could be selected as decisive for the share of the complementary work time category out of the full set of environmental variables taken into consideration in the estimation of the time-consumption of timber harvesting processes.","PeriodicalId":35789,"journal":{"name":"Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of complementary work time in timber harvesting processes\",\"authors\":\"Krzysztof Kamiński, G. Szewczyk, J. Kocel\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ffp-2020-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract One of the essential elements of work technology assessment is task performance time. In the working day structure, production times are crucial; however, under certain conditions, complementary work times can have a share of up to 30%. Accurate determination of the time structure of a work shift is very time consuming and requires time measurements using the methods of cumulative timing or snapshot observations. For this reason, the overall share of complementary work times in a work shift is usually estimated roughly, equally for all timber harvesting conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of selected working environment factors on the share of complementary work times in a work shift, in technologies on the manual-machine and the machine levels. The analyses were carried out in 33 forest districts of the Regional Directorate of State Forests in Wrocław. Among forest contractors, surveys were carried out to analyse the time structure of a working day. For each forest district, analyses of environmental factors potentially relevant to the share of complementary work times in a work shift were carried out; these included field features, dispersion of stands, features of timber, area accessibility. The total share of complementary work times in the machine-level technology variant amounted to approx. 40% and was higher than the manual-machine technological variant, where this share amounted to approx. 35%. The models developed for standardization of the share of variability of complementary work times, in the case of the manual-machine technology level, took into account the share of timber assortments with the length of over 2.5 m as well as the share of upland and mountain sites. In the case of timber harvesting at the machine technology level, the standardization model included as significant the factors such as the share of coniferous forest sites, the number of forest complexes with an area of over 100 hectares, and the total length of roads. Therefore, the above features could be selected as decisive for the share of the complementary work time category out of the full set of environmental variables taken into consideration in the estimation of the time-consumption of timber harvesting processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2020-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2020-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

任务执行时间是工作技术评估的基本要素之一。在工作日结构中,生产时间至关重要;然而,在某些情况下,补充工作时间的比例可高达30%。准确确定工作班次的时间结构是非常耗时的,需要使用累积计时或快照观察的方法进行时间测量。由于这个原因,在一个工作班次中补充工作时间的总份额通常大致估计,对所有木材采伐条件都是相等的。本研究的目的是确定选定的工作环境因素对工作班次中互补工作时间份额的影响,在手动机器和机器水平上的技术。这些分析是在Wrocław国家森林区域管理局的33个林区进行的。对森林承包者进行了调查,以分析一个工作日的时间结构。对每个林区,都进行了对可能与工作班次中补充工作时间份额有关的环境因素的分析;这些包括田间特征、林分分布、木材特征和区域可达性。在机器级技术变体中,互补工作时间的总份额约为。40%,高于手动机器技术变体,其中这一份额约为。35%。在手工机器技术水平的情况下,为使补充工作时间的可变性份额标准化而开发的模型考虑了长度超过2.5米的木材品种的份额以及高地和山地场地的份额。在机器技术水平的木材采伐方面,标准化模型包括针叶林场址的份额、面积超过100公顷的森林复合体的数量和道路的总长度等因素。因此,在估计木材采伐过程的时间消耗时所考虑的全套环境变量中,可以选择上述特征作为补充性工作时间类别所占份额的决定性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardization of complementary work time in timber harvesting processes
Abstract One of the essential elements of work technology assessment is task performance time. In the working day structure, production times are crucial; however, under certain conditions, complementary work times can have a share of up to 30%. Accurate determination of the time structure of a work shift is very time consuming and requires time measurements using the methods of cumulative timing or snapshot observations. For this reason, the overall share of complementary work times in a work shift is usually estimated roughly, equally for all timber harvesting conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of selected working environment factors on the share of complementary work times in a work shift, in technologies on the manual-machine and the machine levels. The analyses were carried out in 33 forest districts of the Regional Directorate of State Forests in Wrocław. Among forest contractors, surveys were carried out to analyse the time structure of a working day. For each forest district, analyses of environmental factors potentially relevant to the share of complementary work times in a work shift were carried out; these included field features, dispersion of stands, features of timber, area accessibility. The total share of complementary work times in the machine-level technology variant amounted to approx. 40% and was higher than the manual-machine technological variant, where this share amounted to approx. 35%. The models developed for standardization of the share of variability of complementary work times, in the case of the manual-machine technology level, took into account the share of timber assortments with the length of over 2.5 m as well as the share of upland and mountain sites. In the case of timber harvesting at the machine technology level, the standardization model included as significant the factors such as the share of coniferous forest sites, the number of forest complexes with an area of over 100 hectares, and the total length of roads. Therefore, the above features could be selected as decisive for the share of the complementary work time category out of the full set of environmental variables taken into consideration in the estimation of the time-consumption of timber harvesting processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A
Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: FOLIA FORESTALIA POLONICA, SERIES A – FORESTRY is a forest science magazine addressed to scientists, administrators and policy-makers in forestry, agroforestry, ecology, environment and resource management. The language of publication is English and papers from any region of the world are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信