欧洲民主与新自由主义极权主义

Diogenes Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.54664/ykua4753
M. Bodin
{"title":"欧洲民主与新自由主义极权主义","authors":"M. Bodin","doi":"10.54664/ykua4753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper points out the need for a philosophical articulation of democracy, contrary to ideological interpretations in the context of liberalism, i.e. the paradigm of liberal democracy. This perspective is considered in the light of the human condition in a pandemic crisis. The world before the COVID-19 pandemic was largely marked by the so-called posthumanism. In this paper, posthumanism is regarded as an entropy of diversity among people and their understandings of the world and life, which is placed in the context of democratization without reflection. Thus, “democracy” makes it impossible for “human phenomena” to be placed under one human idea. What determines this process, however, is not democracy, but a phenomenon which is already known as global extension of neoliberalism. The destructive effects of this ideological hybrid, especially for the sovereignty of the human community, call for renewal of the civilizational foundations of European democracy, which is based on the principle of sovereignty of states and peoples; hence, a philosophically articulated Christian democracy.","PeriodicalId":81110,"journal":{"name":"Diogenes","volume":"07 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Democracy Versus Neoliberal Totalitarism\",\"authors\":\"M. Bodin\",\"doi\":\"10.54664/ykua4753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper points out the need for a philosophical articulation of democracy, contrary to ideological interpretations in the context of liberalism, i.e. the paradigm of liberal democracy. This perspective is considered in the light of the human condition in a pandemic crisis. The world before the COVID-19 pandemic was largely marked by the so-called posthumanism. In this paper, posthumanism is regarded as an entropy of diversity among people and their understandings of the world and life, which is placed in the context of democratization without reflection. Thus, “democracy” makes it impossible for “human phenomena” to be placed under one human idea. What determines this process, however, is not democracy, but a phenomenon which is already known as global extension of neoliberalism. The destructive effects of this ideological hybrid, especially for the sovereignty of the human community, call for renewal of the civilizational foundations of European democracy, which is based on the principle of sovereignty of states and peoples; hence, a philosophically articulated Christian democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diogenes\",\"volume\":\"07 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diogenes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54664/ykua4753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diogenes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/ykua4753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文指出,与自由主义背景下的意识形态解释(即自由民主范式)相反,需要对民主进行哲学阐释。这一观点是根据大流行病危机中的人类状况来考虑的。COVID-19大流行之前的世界基本上是所谓的后人类主义。本文将后人文主义视为人类及其对世界和生活的理解的多样性熵,将其置于没有反思的民主化语境中。因此,“民主”使得“人类现象”不可能被置于一种人类观念之下。然而,决定这一进程的不是民主,而是一种已经被称为新自由主义全球延伸的现象。这种意识形态混合的破坏性影响,特别是对人类社会主权的破坏性影响,要求更新以国家和人民主权原则为基础的欧洲民主的文明基础;因此,一个哲学上清晰的基督教民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European Democracy Versus Neoliberal Totalitarism
This paper points out the need for a philosophical articulation of democracy, contrary to ideological interpretations in the context of liberalism, i.e. the paradigm of liberal democracy. This perspective is considered in the light of the human condition in a pandemic crisis. The world before the COVID-19 pandemic was largely marked by the so-called posthumanism. In this paper, posthumanism is regarded as an entropy of diversity among people and their understandings of the world and life, which is placed in the context of democratization without reflection. Thus, “democracy” makes it impossible for “human phenomena” to be placed under one human idea. What determines this process, however, is not democracy, but a phenomenon which is already known as global extension of neoliberalism. The destructive effects of this ideological hybrid, especially for the sovereignty of the human community, call for renewal of the civilizational foundations of European democracy, which is based on the principle of sovereignty of states and peoples; hence, a philosophically articulated Christian democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信