安全远程更新协议在模拟真实世界条件下的性能评估

Andrew John Poulter, S. J. Cox
{"title":"安全远程更新协议在模拟真实世界条件下的性能评估","authors":"Andrew John Poulter, S. J. Cox","doi":"10.3390/iot2040028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assesses the relative performance of the MQTT protocol in comparison to the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP) in a number of simulated real-world conditions, and describes an experiment that has been conducted to measure the processing delay associated with the use of the more secure protocol. Experimental measurements for power consumption of the devices and the size of comparable TCP packets were also made. Analysis shows that the use of the SRUP protocol added an additional processing delay of between 42.92 ms and 51.60 ms—depending on the specific hardware in use. There was also shown to be a 55.47% increase in power consumption when running the secure SRUP protocol, compared with an MQTT implementation.","PeriodicalId":6745,"journal":{"name":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of the Performance of the Secure Remote Update Protocol in Simulated Real-World Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Andrew John Poulter, S. J. Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/iot2040028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper assesses the relative performance of the MQTT protocol in comparison to the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP) in a number of simulated real-world conditions, and describes an experiment that has been conducted to measure the processing delay associated with the use of the more secure protocol. Experimental measurements for power consumption of the devices and the size of comparable TCP packets were also made. Analysis shows that the use of the SRUP protocol added an additional processing delay of between 42.92 ms and 51.60 ms—depending on the specific hardware in use. There was also shown to be a 55.47% increase in power consumption when running the secure SRUP protocol, compared with an MQTT implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot2040028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot2040028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了MQTT协议与安全远程更新协议(SRUP)在许多模拟现实世界条件下的相对性能,并描述了一个实验,该实验用于测量与使用更安全的协议相关的处理延迟。实验测量了设备的功耗和可比较的TCP数据包的大小。分析表明,使用SRUP协议会增加42.92 ms到51.60 ms之间的额外处理延迟,这取决于所使用的特定硬件。与MQTT实现相比,运行安全SRUP协议时的功耗增加了55.47%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of the Performance of the Secure Remote Update Protocol in Simulated Real-World Conditions
This paper assesses the relative performance of the MQTT protocol in comparison to the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP) in a number of simulated real-world conditions, and describes an experiment that has been conducted to measure the processing delay associated with the use of the more secure protocol. Experimental measurements for power consumption of the devices and the size of comparable TCP packets were also made. Analysis shows that the use of the SRUP protocol added an additional processing delay of between 42.92 ms and 51.60 ms—depending on the specific hardware in use. There was also shown to be a 55.47% increase in power consumption when running the secure SRUP protocol, compared with an MQTT implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信