混合增材制造的材料效率和经济性

Peter Francis Reginald Elvis, S. Kumaraguru
{"title":"混合增材制造的材料效率和经济性","authors":"Peter Francis Reginald Elvis, S. Kumaraguru","doi":"10.1115/msec2021-63739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the past few years, Hybrid Additive Manufacturing has emerged to take advantage of both Additive Manufacturing and Subtractive Manufacturing processes and also to overcome the limitation of one process with the other. In aerospace applications, material wastage has become an issue in conventional machining process which reflects in total production cost and time. Especially, when dealing with expensive materials, conventional processes lack material efficiency with high buy-to-fly ratio which results in increased material cost. This paper deals with Hybrid Additive Manufacturing involving two different volume partitioning strategies — (i) Feature-based volume partitioning method (ii) Stock-based near net-shaping volume partitioning method to discuss the economics and material efficiency of Hybrid Additive Manufacturing process via simple cost estimator (formulated from the existing literature) by comparing these two volume partitioning strategies through suitable case studies — (i) Turbine blade and (ii) Impeller. From the results, it was found that the feature-based volume partitioning method was found to be material efficient and cost effective than the stock based near net shaping volume partitioning method in both the case studies.","PeriodicalId":56519,"journal":{"name":"光:先进制造(英文)","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material Efficiency and Economics of Hybrid Additive Manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Peter Francis Reginald Elvis, S. Kumaraguru\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/msec2021-63739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the past few years, Hybrid Additive Manufacturing has emerged to take advantage of both Additive Manufacturing and Subtractive Manufacturing processes and also to overcome the limitation of one process with the other. In aerospace applications, material wastage has become an issue in conventional machining process which reflects in total production cost and time. Especially, when dealing with expensive materials, conventional processes lack material efficiency with high buy-to-fly ratio which results in increased material cost. This paper deals with Hybrid Additive Manufacturing involving two different volume partitioning strategies — (i) Feature-based volume partitioning method (ii) Stock-based near net-shaping volume partitioning method to discuss the economics and material efficiency of Hybrid Additive Manufacturing process via simple cost estimator (formulated from the existing literature) by comparing these two volume partitioning strategies through suitable case studies — (i) Turbine blade and (ii) Impeller. From the results, it was found that the feature-based volume partitioning method was found to be material efficient and cost effective than the stock based near net shaping volume partitioning method in both the case studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"光:先进制造(英文)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"光:先进制造(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/msec2021-63739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"光:先进制造(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/msec2021-63739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几年里,混合增材制造已经出现,利用增材制造和减法制造工艺的优势,也克服了一种工艺与另一种工艺的局限性。在航空航天应用中,材料浪费已成为传统机械加工过程中的一个问题,它反映在总生产成本和时间上。特别是在处理昂贵的材料时,传统工艺缺乏材料效率,采购比高,导致材料成本增加。本文讨论了混合增材制造涉及两种不同的体积划分策略- (i)基于特征的体积划分方法(ii)基于库存的近净成形体积划分方法,通过比较这两种体积划分策略,通过适当的案例研究(i)涡轮叶片和(ii)叶轮,通过简单的成本估算(从现有文献中制定)来讨论混合增材制造过程的经济性和材料效率。结果表明,基于特征的体积划分方法比基于库存的近净成型体积划分方法具有材料效率和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Material Efficiency and Economics of Hybrid Additive Manufacturing
In the past few years, Hybrid Additive Manufacturing has emerged to take advantage of both Additive Manufacturing and Subtractive Manufacturing processes and also to overcome the limitation of one process with the other. In aerospace applications, material wastage has become an issue in conventional machining process which reflects in total production cost and time. Especially, when dealing with expensive materials, conventional processes lack material efficiency with high buy-to-fly ratio which results in increased material cost. This paper deals with Hybrid Additive Manufacturing involving two different volume partitioning strategies — (i) Feature-based volume partitioning method (ii) Stock-based near net-shaping volume partitioning method to discuss the economics and material efficiency of Hybrid Additive Manufacturing process via simple cost estimator (formulated from the existing literature) by comparing these two volume partitioning strategies through suitable case studies — (i) Turbine blade and (ii) Impeller. From the results, it was found that the feature-based volume partitioning method was found to be material efficient and cost effective than the stock based near net shaping volume partitioning method in both the case studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信