欧洲人权法院判例法中学童的受教育权和宗教自由:对Papageorgiou诉希腊案的评论

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
G. Milios
{"title":"欧洲人权法院判例法中学童的受教育权和宗教自由:对Papageorgiou诉希腊案的评论","authors":"G. Milios","doi":"10.1515/icl-2021-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article deals with the schoolchildren’s right to education and freedom of religion in the case law of the ECtHR, with a special focus on the case Papageorgiou v Greece adopted in October 2019. In the case at hand, the applicants challenged the content of the religious courses in Greece as well as the opt-out procedure offered for parents who did not wish their children to participate in the religious course. The Court concluded that the exemption procedure violated Art 2 of Protocol 1 of the ECHR. After examining previous case law of the ECtHR on similar cases, the article focuses on the most striking parts of the Court’s judgment in Papageorgiou. In particular, the ECtHR only considered the exemption procedure from the courses offered, and made no reference to, or examination of, the courses themselves. In addition, the perspective related to the right to private life is also missing. The article concludes by commenting that the Court’s judgment had already had an impact on the case law of the Greek Supreme Administrative Court.","PeriodicalId":41321,"journal":{"name":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schoolchildren’s Right to Education and Freedom of Religion in the Case Law of the ECtHR: Comments on Papageorgiou v Greece\",\"authors\":\"G. Milios\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/icl-2021-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article deals with the schoolchildren’s right to education and freedom of religion in the case law of the ECtHR, with a special focus on the case Papageorgiou v Greece adopted in October 2019. In the case at hand, the applicants challenged the content of the religious courses in Greece as well as the opt-out procedure offered for parents who did not wish their children to participate in the religious course. The Court concluded that the exemption procedure violated Art 2 of Protocol 1 of the ECHR. After examining previous case law of the ECtHR on similar cases, the article focuses on the most striking parts of the Court’s judgment in Papageorgiou. In particular, the ECtHR only considered the exemption procedure from the courses offered, and made no reference to, or examination of, the courses themselves. In addition, the perspective related to the right to private life is also missing. The article concludes by commenting that the Court’s judgment had already had an impact on the case law of the Greek Supreme Administrative Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了欧洲人权法院判例法中学童的受教育权和宗教自由,并重点讨论了2019年10月通过的Papageorgiou诉希腊案。在本案中,申请人对希腊宗教课程的内容以及为不希望其子女参加宗教课程的父母提供的选择退出程序提出质疑。法院的结论是,豁免程序违反了《欧洲人权公约》第1议定书第2条。在审查了欧洲人权法院以往关于类似案件的判例法之后,本文着重讨论了法院在Papageorgiou案判决中最引人注目的部分。特别是,欧洲人权法院只审议了所提供课程的豁免程序,而没有提及课程本身或对课程本身的考试。此外,与私人生命权相关的视角也缺失。文章最后评论说,法院的判决已经对希腊最高行政法院的判例法产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schoolchildren’s Right to Education and Freedom of Religion in the Case Law of the ECtHR: Comments on Papageorgiou v Greece
Abstract The article deals with the schoolchildren’s right to education and freedom of religion in the case law of the ECtHR, with a special focus on the case Papageorgiou v Greece adopted in October 2019. In the case at hand, the applicants challenged the content of the religious courses in Greece as well as the opt-out procedure offered for parents who did not wish their children to participate in the religious course. The Court concluded that the exemption procedure violated Art 2 of Protocol 1 of the ECHR. After examining previous case law of the ECtHR on similar cases, the article focuses on the most striking parts of the Court’s judgment in Papageorgiou. In particular, the ECtHR only considered the exemption procedure from the courses offered, and made no reference to, or examination of, the courses themselves. In addition, the perspective related to the right to private life is also missing. The article concludes by commenting that the Court’s judgment had already had an impact on the case law of the Greek Supreme Administrative Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信