评估社区宜居性:来自LEED®社区发展和新城市主义社区的证据

Q3 Social Sciences
Nicola A. Szibbo
{"title":"评估社区宜居性:来自LEED®社区发展和新城市主义社区的证据","authors":"Nicola A. Szibbo","doi":"10.4000/ARTICULO.3120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LEED® for Neighborhood Development has been rapidly adopted as the de-facto green neighborhood standard and is now used to measure the sustainability of neighborhood design in North America and around the world. Similar to previous LEED® green building rating systems, LEED®ND is heavily reliant on physical & environmental design criteria (such as compact urban form and transit accessibility), and is based on an expert-generated point system. LEED®ND excels at measuring ‘environmental sustainability’ through its stringent criteria; however, it fails to critically address important livability factors, namely socio-cultural and socio-economic factors. Furthermore, no study has critically examined how LEED®ND could better incorporate these missing factors through post-occupancy analysis. In fact, very little research at all has been done that examines the role of livability and social sustainability in LEED-ND neighborhoods. This paper assesses livability in four North American neighborhoods: two LEED®ND and two control suburban New Urbanist cases. This article also provides a series of recommendations for the rating system based on key survey findings.","PeriodicalId":38124,"journal":{"name":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","volume":"02 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Neighborhood Livability: Evidence from LEED® for Neighborhood Development and New Urbanist Communities\",\"authors\":\"Nicola A. Szibbo\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/ARTICULO.3120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"LEED® for Neighborhood Development has been rapidly adopted as the de-facto green neighborhood standard and is now used to measure the sustainability of neighborhood design in North America and around the world. Similar to previous LEED® green building rating systems, LEED®ND is heavily reliant on physical & environmental design criteria (such as compact urban form and transit accessibility), and is based on an expert-generated point system. LEED®ND excels at measuring ‘environmental sustainability’ through its stringent criteria; however, it fails to critically address important livability factors, namely socio-cultural and socio-economic factors. Furthermore, no study has critically examined how LEED®ND could better incorporate these missing factors through post-occupancy analysis. In fact, very little research at all has been done that examines the role of livability and social sustainability in LEED-ND neighborhoods. This paper assesses livability in four North American neighborhoods: two LEED®ND and two control suburban New Urbanist cases. This article also provides a series of recommendations for the rating system based on key survey findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research\",\"volume\":\"02 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.3120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.3120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

LEED®邻里发展已经迅速被采纳为事实上的绿色邻里标准,现在被用来衡量北美和世界各地邻里设计的可持续性。与之前的LEED®绿色建筑评级系统类似,LEED®ND在很大程度上依赖于物理和环境设计标准(如紧凑的城市形态和交通可达性),并基于专家生成的积分系统。LEED®ND通过其严格的标准来衡量“环境可持续性”;然而,它未能关键地解决重要的宜居性因素,即社会文化和社会经济因素。此外,没有研究严格审查LEED®ND如何通过入住后分析更好地纳入这些缺失的因素。事实上,很少有人研究LEED-ND社区中宜居性和社会可持续性的作用。本文评估了四个北美社区的宜居性:两个LEED®ND和两个控制郊区新城市主义者的案例。本文还根据主要调查结果对评级系统提出了一系列建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Neighborhood Livability: Evidence from LEED® for Neighborhood Development and New Urbanist Communities
LEED® for Neighborhood Development has been rapidly adopted as the de-facto green neighborhood standard and is now used to measure the sustainability of neighborhood design in North America and around the world. Similar to previous LEED® green building rating systems, LEED®ND is heavily reliant on physical & environmental design criteria (such as compact urban form and transit accessibility), and is based on an expert-generated point system. LEED®ND excels at measuring ‘environmental sustainability’ through its stringent criteria; however, it fails to critically address important livability factors, namely socio-cultural and socio-economic factors. Furthermore, no study has critically examined how LEED®ND could better incorporate these missing factors through post-occupancy analysis. In fact, very little research at all has been done that examines the role of livability and social sustainability in LEED-ND neighborhoods. This paper assesses livability in four North American neighborhoods: two LEED®ND and two control suburban New Urbanist cases. This article also provides a series of recommendations for the rating system based on key survey findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信