{"title":"Jalakasurma levikust ja ohtlikkusest Eestis","authors":"Liina Jürisoo, Allar Padari ja Rein Drenkhan","doi":"10.2478/fsmu-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This review provides an overview of and describes the current situation of Dutch elm disease (DED), which is one of the most devastating diseases for elms worldwide and in Estonia. It is known that in Estonia DED’s agent Ophiostoma ulmi has been damaging elms since the 1930s. Today a new species Ophiostoma novo-ulmi is considered to be an agent of DED. Since 2013 the current epidemic has been recorded in most of the counties of Estonia. The both known DED agents, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi subsp. americana were molecularly detected on Ulmus spp. Additionally, one hybrid pathogen of the subspecies (americana x novo-ulmi) was identified in northern Estonia. Also, the health status of elms and the potential vector agents of the pathogen are discussed and recommendations for disease management are provided. Summary The threat to Ulmus spp. has risen in Estonia, apparently due to the trade of infected elm plants and changing climatic conditions having contributed to the invasion of new pathogens and their vectors. It is known that in Estonia Dutch Elm Disease (DED) has had a devastating impact on elms since the 1930s. Today its agent Ophiostoma ulmi has been replaced by a new, apparently an invasive species Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in most countries of Europe, as well as in Estonia. Since 2013 the health status of elms in Estonia has worsened substantially. The aim of this research was to analyse the current spread of DED until 2020, specify the taxonomy of pathogens, evaluate the health status of host plants, and analyse the control options of the disease. Visual assessment has been provided for the period of 2014 to 2020. Methods and results for the years 2014–2016 are presented in a previous paper (see Jürisoo et al., 2019). More precise monitoring of Dutch elm disease in Estonia started in 2014. A preliminary map of DED was provided on the basis of the assessments of the distribution (records). Thereafter, in the period of 2014–2020 more than 2,200 trees of genus Ulmus, mostly Ulmus glabra were assessed. Also, over 500 samples were collected of which 183 pure cultures of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi were isolated and analysed with different molecular primers (Table 3). In the period of 2018–2020, DED was detected in 14 counties of the total of 15 counties in Estonia. The analyses show that O. novo-ulmi subsp. novo-ulmi is widely spread; however, O. novo-ulmi subsp. americana was detected only in northern Estonia and on Hiiumaa island in western Estonia (Fig. 6). For the first time the hybrid pathogen (americana x novo-ulmi) was detected at a sampling site at Kose in northern Estonia (Figure 6). Our investigation demonstrated that in terms of the use of Ulmus as an amenity tree species Ulmus laevis could be considered more prospective than U. glabra because the health of U. laevis is significantly better and DED is not so devastating to the host. Also, we have to test resistant hybrid elms in our environmental conditions before starting massive planting in our green areas. All the plant material should meet the local standard on Quality Requirements for the Nursery Plants (see EVS 939-2, 2020). We have created several provenance trials in Estonia to qualify tolerant elm species or origins in the future. DED control is complicated because effective universal control methods are not available. Thus, a good sanitation program together with a reliable survey is needed. Symptomatic elms should be felled and completely destroyed; this seems to be the most effective method for DED control. Introduced planting material should be certified and controlled to minimise the invasion of diseases and pests.","PeriodicalId":35353,"journal":{"name":"Forestry Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文对荷兰榆树病(Dutch elm disease, DED)的现状进行了综述和描述。荷兰榆树病是全世界和爱沙尼亚榆树最具破坏性的疾病之一。众所周知,自20世纪30年代以来,爱沙尼亚DED的代理商Ophiostoma ulmi一直在破坏榆树。目前发现的一种新物种新乌尔米蛇瘤被认为是一种DED病原体。自2013年以来,爱沙尼亚大多数县都记录了目前的疫情。这两种已知的致病菌,新乌米蛇瘤亚种。novoo -ulmi和O. novoo -ulmi子。此外,在爱沙尼亚北部还发现了美洲亚种的一种杂交病原菌(americana x novoo -ulmi)。讨论了榆树的健康状况和潜在的病原体媒介,并提出了疾病管理建议。在爱沙尼亚,榆木属的威胁有所上升,这显然是由于受感染的榆树植物的贸易以及气候条件的变化导致了新的病原体及其媒介的入侵。众所周知,自20世纪30年代以来,爱沙尼亚的荷兰榆树病(DED)对榆树造成了毁灭性的影响。今天,在欧洲大多数国家和爱沙尼亚,它的病原体乌尔米蛇已经被一种新的、明显是入侵物种的新乌尔米蛇所取代。自2013年以来,爱沙尼亚榆树的健康状况大幅恶化。本研究的目的是分析到2020年DED的传播现状,明确病原体的分类,评估寄主植物的健康状况,并分析疾病的控制方案。提供了2014年至2020年期间的目视评估。2014-2016年的方法和结果见之前的一篇论文(见j risoo et al., 2019)。2014年,爱沙尼亚开始对荷兰榆树病进行更精确的监测。根据对分布(记录)的评估,绘制了DED的初步地图。随后,在2014-2020年期间,对2200多棵榆属树木进行了评估,其中大部分是大榆。此外,收集了500多个样本,其中分离了183个新乌尔米蛇瘤纯培养物,并使用不同的分子引物进行了分析(表3)。在2018-2020年期间,爱沙尼亚15个县中的14个县检测到DED。分析结果表明,O. novoo -ulmi亚种。nova -ulmi的传播范围很广;然而,O. novo-ulmi subsp。美国是只发现在爱沙尼亚北部和西部Hiiumaa岛上爱沙尼亚(图6)。第一次混合病原体(美国x novo-ulmi)检测在采样站点在爱沙尼亚北部高丝(图6)。我们的调查表明,在榆属的使用作为一个礼仪树种榆属光滑的可以被认为是比美国更前瞻性glabra因为美国的健康光滑的明显更好,d并非如此毁灭性的主机。此外,在开始在绿地大规模种植之前,我们必须在我们的环境条件下测试耐药的杂交榆树。所有植物材料应符合当地《苗木质量要求》标准(见EVS 939-2, 2020)。我们已经在爱沙尼亚进行了几项来源试验,以确定未来榆树品种或原产地的耐受性。由于没有有效的通用控制方法,电磁干扰控制非常复杂。因此,需要一个良好的卫生规划和可靠的调查。有症状的榆树应予以砍伐和彻底销毁;这似乎是控制DED最有效的方法。引进的种植材料应经过认证和控制,以尽量减少病虫害的入侵。
Abstract This review provides an overview of and describes the current situation of Dutch elm disease (DED), which is one of the most devastating diseases for elms worldwide and in Estonia. It is known that in Estonia DED’s agent Ophiostoma ulmi has been damaging elms since the 1930s. Today a new species Ophiostoma novo-ulmi is considered to be an agent of DED. Since 2013 the current epidemic has been recorded in most of the counties of Estonia. The both known DED agents, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi subsp. americana were molecularly detected on Ulmus spp. Additionally, one hybrid pathogen of the subspecies (americana x novo-ulmi) was identified in northern Estonia. Also, the health status of elms and the potential vector agents of the pathogen are discussed and recommendations for disease management are provided. Summary The threat to Ulmus spp. has risen in Estonia, apparently due to the trade of infected elm plants and changing climatic conditions having contributed to the invasion of new pathogens and their vectors. It is known that in Estonia Dutch Elm Disease (DED) has had a devastating impact on elms since the 1930s. Today its agent Ophiostoma ulmi has been replaced by a new, apparently an invasive species Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in most countries of Europe, as well as in Estonia. Since 2013 the health status of elms in Estonia has worsened substantially. The aim of this research was to analyse the current spread of DED until 2020, specify the taxonomy of pathogens, evaluate the health status of host plants, and analyse the control options of the disease. Visual assessment has been provided for the period of 2014 to 2020. Methods and results for the years 2014–2016 are presented in a previous paper (see Jürisoo et al., 2019). More precise monitoring of Dutch elm disease in Estonia started in 2014. A preliminary map of DED was provided on the basis of the assessments of the distribution (records). Thereafter, in the period of 2014–2020 more than 2,200 trees of genus Ulmus, mostly Ulmus glabra were assessed. Also, over 500 samples were collected of which 183 pure cultures of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi were isolated and analysed with different molecular primers (Table 3). In the period of 2018–2020, DED was detected in 14 counties of the total of 15 counties in Estonia. The analyses show that O. novo-ulmi subsp. novo-ulmi is widely spread; however, O. novo-ulmi subsp. americana was detected only in northern Estonia and on Hiiumaa island in western Estonia (Fig. 6). For the first time the hybrid pathogen (americana x novo-ulmi) was detected at a sampling site at Kose in northern Estonia (Figure 6). Our investigation demonstrated that in terms of the use of Ulmus as an amenity tree species Ulmus laevis could be considered more prospective than U. glabra because the health of U. laevis is significantly better and DED is not so devastating to the host. Also, we have to test resistant hybrid elms in our environmental conditions before starting massive planting in our green areas. All the plant material should meet the local standard on Quality Requirements for the Nursery Plants (see EVS 939-2, 2020). We have created several provenance trials in Estonia to qualify tolerant elm species or origins in the future. DED control is complicated because effective universal control methods are not available. Thus, a good sanitation program together with a reliable survey is needed. Symptomatic elms should be felled and completely destroyed; this seems to be the most effective method for DED control. Introduced planting material should be certified and controlled to minimise the invasion of diseases and pests.