《两个兰加蒂拉的故事:路易·马尼阿波托、维瑞姆·塔米哈纳和怀卡托战争

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
V. O'Malley
{"title":"《两个兰加蒂拉的故事:路易·马尼阿波托、维瑞姆·塔米哈纳和怀卡托战争","authors":"V. O'Malley","doi":"10.15286/jps.125.4.341-357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The depiction of Ngāti Maniapoto generally and Rewi Maniapoto in particular as extremists with an almost fanatical determination to fight the British runs deep in the historiography of the New Zealand Wars, all the way from John Featon to G. W. Rusden, James Cowan to Keith Sinclair and others. And a corollary argument is that Ngāti Maniapoto, through their actions and gestures, provoked the Crown (whether justly or unjustly) into launching an invasion of the Waikato district in July 1863, and 357 Vincent O’Malley then escaped virtually scot-free from the subsequent confiscation of lands. Even fierce critics of the government’s actions in the 1860s thus end up at least partly legitimising or justifying war and confiscation by reference to the supposed partial provocation of Ngāti Maniapoto and their leader. Their stance is often contrasted with that of Wiremu Tamihana, who is said to have been leader of the “moderate” Kīngitanga faction. This article argues that the differences between the two rangatira have been overstated. Wiremu Tamihana and Rewi Maniapoto had more in common than divided them. Furthermore, rather than conceptualising this in terms of “moderate” versus “extremist”, the difference between the two rangatira might be better conceptualised as idealist versus realist. Considered within the context of Māori custom, moreover, both men operated within the accepted limits of chiefly behaviour, which was concerned above all with questions of mana.","PeriodicalId":45869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Polynesian Society","volume":"98 1","pages":"341-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Two Rangatira: Rewi Maniapoto, Wiremu Tamihana and the Waikato War\",\"authors\":\"V. O'Malley\",\"doi\":\"10.15286/jps.125.4.341-357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The depiction of Ngāti Maniapoto generally and Rewi Maniapoto in particular as extremists with an almost fanatical determination to fight the British runs deep in the historiography of the New Zealand Wars, all the way from John Featon to G. W. Rusden, James Cowan to Keith Sinclair and others. And a corollary argument is that Ngāti Maniapoto, through their actions and gestures, provoked the Crown (whether justly or unjustly) into launching an invasion of the Waikato district in July 1863, and 357 Vincent O’Malley then escaped virtually scot-free from the subsequent confiscation of lands. Even fierce critics of the government’s actions in the 1860s thus end up at least partly legitimising or justifying war and confiscation by reference to the supposed partial provocation of Ngāti Maniapoto and their leader. Their stance is often contrasted with that of Wiremu Tamihana, who is said to have been leader of the “moderate” Kīngitanga faction. This article argues that the differences between the two rangatira have been overstated. Wiremu Tamihana and Rewi Maniapoto had more in common than divided them. Furthermore, rather than conceptualising this in terms of “moderate” versus “extremist”, the difference between the two rangatira might be better conceptualised as idealist versus realist. Considered within the context of Māori custom, moreover, both men operated within the accepted limits of chiefly behaviour, which was concerned above all with questions of mana.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Polynesian Society\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"341-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Polynesian Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15286/jps.125.4.341-357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Polynesian Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15286/jps.125.4.341-357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对Ngāti Maniapoto的描述,尤其是对Rewi Maniapoto的描述,在新西兰战争的史学中,从约翰·费森到g·w·罗斯登,从詹姆斯·考恩到基思·辛克莱等人,都是极端分子,他们对英国人有着近乎狂热的决心。推论是Ngāti Maniapoto,通过他们的行动和姿态,激怒了国王(无论公正与否)在1863年7月发动了对怀卡托地区的入侵,357文森特·奥麦利逃脱了随后的土地没收。因此,即使是对19世纪60年代政府行为的激烈批评,最终也至少在一定程度上通过Ngāti Maniapoto及其领导人的部分挑衅,将战争和没收合法化或正当化。他们的立场经常与Wiremu Tamihana的立场形成对比,后者据说是“温和的”k恩吉坦加派的领导人。本文认为,两种rangatira之间的差异被夸大了。Wiremu Tamihana和Rewi Maniapoto有更多的共同点而不是分歧。此外,与其将其概念化为“温和”与“极端”,不如将这两种rangatira之间的差异概念化为理想主义与现实主义。此外,在Māori习俗的背景下考虑,两人都在主要行为的可接受范围内活动,这首先与mana问题有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tale of Two Rangatira: Rewi Maniapoto, Wiremu Tamihana and the Waikato War
The depiction of Ngāti Maniapoto generally and Rewi Maniapoto in particular as extremists with an almost fanatical determination to fight the British runs deep in the historiography of the New Zealand Wars, all the way from John Featon to G. W. Rusden, James Cowan to Keith Sinclair and others. And a corollary argument is that Ngāti Maniapoto, through their actions and gestures, provoked the Crown (whether justly or unjustly) into launching an invasion of the Waikato district in July 1863, and 357 Vincent O’Malley then escaped virtually scot-free from the subsequent confiscation of lands. Even fierce critics of the government’s actions in the 1860s thus end up at least partly legitimising or justifying war and confiscation by reference to the supposed partial provocation of Ngāti Maniapoto and their leader. Their stance is often contrasted with that of Wiremu Tamihana, who is said to have been leader of the “moderate” Kīngitanga faction. This article argues that the differences between the two rangatira have been overstated. Wiremu Tamihana and Rewi Maniapoto had more in common than divided them. Furthermore, rather than conceptualising this in terms of “moderate” versus “extremist”, the difference between the two rangatira might be better conceptualised as idealist versus realist. Considered within the context of Māori custom, moreover, both men operated within the accepted limits of chiefly behaviour, which was concerned above all with questions of mana.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信