评价Phoenix 100与Microflex LT MALDI-TOF质谱系统在临床微生物实验室常规分离微生物鉴定中的兼容性

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
C. Çelik, E. Uysal, Uğur Tutar, Rahşan Erturk, M. Z. Bakıcı, M. G. Gozel
{"title":"评价Phoenix 100与Microflex LT MALDI-TOF质谱系统在临床微生物实验室常规分离微生物鉴定中的兼容性","authors":"C. Çelik, E. Uysal, Uğur Tutar, Rahşan Erturk, M. Z. Bakıcı, M. G. Gozel","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2015-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a quick, reliable, and efficient system for identifying microorganisms. Many centers that use the Phoenix 100 system today may adopt a MALDI-TOF MS system in the future. Our laboratory recently undertook this pivot. The present study evaluates the reproducibility of species identifications made by the Phoenix 100 and MALDI-TOF MS systems, during a period of transitioning laboratory instrumentation. Methods: Eight hundred and twelve microbial isolates, from aerobic cultures of different clinical samples, were identified simultaneously with Phoenix 100 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) and a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) devices. Results: Both systems made identical species assignments for 98.9%, 92.1%, 95.1%, and 93.1% of Gram-negative isolates, catalase-positive Gram-positive cocci isolates, catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci isolates, and Candida isolates, respectively. Conclusions: Identifications made by two instruments commonly used in microbiology laboratories, the Phoenix 100 and the Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS, are highly consistent.","PeriodicalId":49926,"journal":{"name":"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"105 1","pages":"183 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the compatibility of Phoenix 100 and Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS systems in the identification of routinely isolated microorganisms in the clinic microbiology laboratory\",\"authors\":\"C. Çelik, E. Uysal, Uğur Tutar, Rahşan Erturk, M. Z. Bakıcı, M. G. Gozel\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2015-0105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a quick, reliable, and efficient system for identifying microorganisms. Many centers that use the Phoenix 100 system today may adopt a MALDI-TOF MS system in the future. Our laboratory recently undertook this pivot. The present study evaluates the reproducibility of species identifications made by the Phoenix 100 and MALDI-TOF MS systems, during a period of transitioning laboratory instrumentation. Methods: Eight hundred and twelve microbial isolates, from aerobic cultures of different clinical samples, were identified simultaneously with Phoenix 100 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) and a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) devices. Results: Both systems made identical species assignments for 98.9%, 92.1%, 95.1%, and 93.1% of Gram-negative isolates, catalase-positive Gram-positive cocci isolates, catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci isolates, and Candida isolates, respectively. Conclusions: Identifications made by two instruments commonly used in microbiology laboratories, the Phoenix 100 and the Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS, are highly consistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2015-0105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2015-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)是一种快速、可靠、高效的微生物鉴定系统。许多目前使用Phoenix 100系统的中心将来可能会采用MALDI-TOF MS系统。我们的实验室最近进行了这项实验。在实验室仪器过渡期间,本研究评估了Phoenix 100和MALDI-TOF MS系统进行物种鉴定的可重复性。方法:采用Phoenix 100 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA)和Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany)设备同时对来自不同临床样品的好氧培养的812株微生物进行鉴定。结果:两种系统分别对革兰氏阴性菌、过氧化氢酶阳性革兰氏阳性球菌、过氧化氢酶阴性革兰氏阳性球菌和念珠菌分离株的鉴定结果相同,分别为98.9%、92.1%、95.1%和93.1%。结论:微生物实验室常用的两种仪器Phoenix 100和Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS鉴定结果高度一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the compatibility of Phoenix 100 and Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS systems in the identification of routinely isolated microorganisms in the clinic microbiology laboratory
Abstract Background: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a quick, reliable, and efficient system for identifying microorganisms. Many centers that use the Phoenix 100 system today may adopt a MALDI-TOF MS system in the future. Our laboratory recently undertook this pivot. The present study evaluates the reproducibility of species identifications made by the Phoenix 100 and MALDI-TOF MS systems, during a period of transitioning laboratory instrumentation. Methods: Eight hundred and twelve microbial isolates, from aerobic cultures of different clinical samples, were identified simultaneously with Phoenix 100 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) and a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) devices. Results: Both systems made identical species assignments for 98.9%, 92.1%, 95.1%, and 93.1% of Gram-negative isolates, catalase-positive Gram-positive cocci isolates, catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci isolates, and Candida isolates, respectively. Conclusions: Identifications made by two instruments commonly used in microbiology laboratories, the Phoenix 100 and the Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS, are highly consistent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信