将这种关系提升到下一个层次:比较支持者如何在facebook和twitter上与慈善机构交谈

Christopher Phethean, T. Tiropanis, L. Harris
{"title":"将这种关系提升到下一个层次:比较支持者如何在facebook和twitter上与慈善机构交谈","authors":"Christopher Phethean, T. Tiropanis, L. Harris","doi":"10.1145/2615569.2615648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media provide a unique opportunity for charities to reach a large audience with whom they can engage in productive two-way conversations. This abstract reports findings from a study that seeks to determine the extent to which these conversations occur, and whether they differ between Facebook and Twitter. Differences arise showing that Facebook receives more conversations in response to the charities' own posts. However, on Twitter more comments are made per each engaged supporter, which could represent more unsolicited discussion that provides an alternative type of value.","PeriodicalId":93136,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","volume":"6 1","pages":"271-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the relationship to the next level: a comparison of how supporters converse with charities on facebook and twitter\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Phethean, T. Tiropanis, L. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2615569.2615648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media provide a unique opportunity for charities to reach a large audience with whom they can engage in productive two-way conversations. This abstract reports findings from a study that seeks to determine the extent to which these conversations occur, and whether they differ between Facebook and Twitter. Differences arise showing that Facebook receives more conversations in response to the charities' own posts. However, on Twitter more comments are made per each engaged supporter, which could represent more unsolicited discussion that provides an alternative type of value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"271-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

社交媒体为慈善机构提供了一个独特的机会,可以接触到大量的受众,与他们进行富有成效的双向对话。这篇摘要报道了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在确定这些对话发生的程度,以及它们在Facebook和Twitter之间是否不同。不同之处在于,Facebook收到了更多关于慈善机构自己帖子的回复。然而,在Twitter上,每个参与的支持者都有更多的评论,这可能代表了更多的主动讨论,提供了另一种价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking the relationship to the next level: a comparison of how supporters converse with charities on facebook and twitter
Social media provide a unique opportunity for charities to reach a large audience with whom they can engage in productive two-way conversations. This abstract reports findings from a study that seeks to determine the extent to which these conversations occur, and whether they differ between Facebook and Twitter. Differences arise showing that Facebook receives more conversations in response to the charities' own posts. However, on Twitter more comments are made per each engaged supporter, which could represent more unsolicited discussion that provides an alternative type of value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信