某气田排水井眼及排井效率调查

A. Penigin, E. Sergeev, A. Varavva, A. F. Yamaletdinov
{"title":"某气田排水井眼及排井效率调查","authors":"A. Penigin, E. Sergeev, A. Varavva, A. F. Yamaletdinov","doi":"10.2118/206582-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper describes the assessment process of methods for the construction and operation of gas wells with a large water-gas ratio. One of the ways to tackle the issue of poor performance of high WGR wells is to drill a drainage wellbore with an ESP to lift accumulating water. In addition, various configurations of well placement through gas-bearing and water-bearing reservoirs have been considered.\n To evaluate the efficiency of a drainage wellbore with an ESP installed for lifting water that comes from the main, productive, wellbore, industry-recognized non-stationary dynamic multiphase flow simulator was used, as well as a more refined tool, such as the physical simulator based on the finite volume method (computational fluid dynamics, CFD). A non-stationary dynamic simulator was also used to assess the impact of well placement through gas- and water-bearings reservoirs. Well data, fluid data, physical parameters were entered into the models and, by varying the input parameters, dependencies and results were obtained, allowing to draw a conclusion about the efficiency of each method, as well as about the software capabilities and limitations.\n The applicability and technical efficiency of an additional drainage borehole with an ESP tto ensure stable operation / high productivity of the well strongly depend on the value of the water-gas ratio, the higher it is, the lower the efficiency of the method. In addition, efficiency also decreases with increasing gas rate. To assess the correctness of the calculation made with dynamic multiphase flow simulator, which is the industry standard, a verification calculation was also carried out on a physical simulator using the finite volume method, which shows the same trends, but with different absolute values. It also made it possible to assess the influence of the geometry factor on the distribution of flows, which could not be done by the non-stationary multiphase flow simulator. Apart from this, it was concluded that the location of a water-bearing reservoir in the last lower part of the wellbore is preferable, since then the impact on production is less than when it is located above the gas-bearing interval. Changing the well layout to a U-shaped one affects the dynamics of its operation insignificantly.\n The study helps to answer the question about the efficiency of using a borehole with an ESP and about the degree of influence of drilling through gas- and water-bearing reservoirs using the example of a real field, as well as it presents the method of conducting such an assessment for other fields.","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency Survey of a Drainage Wellbore and Well Placement in Gas Fields\",\"authors\":\"A. Penigin, E. Sergeev, A. Varavva, A. F. Yamaletdinov\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/206582-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper describes the assessment process of methods for the construction and operation of gas wells with a large water-gas ratio. One of the ways to tackle the issue of poor performance of high WGR wells is to drill a drainage wellbore with an ESP to lift accumulating water. In addition, various configurations of well placement through gas-bearing and water-bearing reservoirs have been considered.\\n To evaluate the efficiency of a drainage wellbore with an ESP installed for lifting water that comes from the main, productive, wellbore, industry-recognized non-stationary dynamic multiphase flow simulator was used, as well as a more refined tool, such as the physical simulator based on the finite volume method (computational fluid dynamics, CFD). A non-stationary dynamic simulator was also used to assess the impact of well placement through gas- and water-bearings reservoirs. Well data, fluid data, physical parameters were entered into the models and, by varying the input parameters, dependencies and results were obtained, allowing to draw a conclusion about the efficiency of each method, as well as about the software capabilities and limitations.\\n The applicability and technical efficiency of an additional drainage borehole with an ESP tto ensure stable operation / high productivity of the well strongly depend on the value of the water-gas ratio, the higher it is, the lower the efficiency of the method. In addition, efficiency also decreases with increasing gas rate. To assess the correctness of the calculation made with dynamic multiphase flow simulator, which is the industry standard, a verification calculation was also carried out on a physical simulator using the finite volume method, which shows the same trends, but with different absolute values. It also made it possible to assess the influence of the geometry factor on the distribution of flows, which could not be done by the non-stationary multiphase flow simulator. Apart from this, it was concluded that the location of a water-bearing reservoir in the last lower part of the wellbore is preferable, since then the impact on production is less than when it is located above the gas-bearing interval. Changing the well layout to a U-shaped one affects the dynamics of its operation insignificantly.\\n The study helps to answer the question about the efficiency of using a borehole with an ESP and about the degree of influence of drilling through gas- and water-bearing reservoirs using the example of a real field, as well as it presents the method of conducting such an assessment for other fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/206582-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206582-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了大水气比气井建设和运行方法的评价过程。解决高WGR井性能不佳问题的方法之一是使用ESP钻出排水井,以提升积水。此外,还考虑了含气层和含水层的不同布置方式。为了评估ESP对主要生产井的抽采效率,使用了业界公认的非稳态动态多相流模拟器,以及基于有限体积法(计算流体动力学,CFD)的物理模拟器等更精细的工具。此外,还使用了一个非稳态动态模拟器来评估通过含气和含水储层的井眼布置的影响。将井数据、流体数据、物理参数输入到模型中,通过改变输入参数,可以获得依赖关系和结果,从而得出每种方法的效率以及软件功能和局限性的结论。ESP附加排水井的适用性和技术效率在很大程度上取决于水气比的值,水气比越高,该方法的效率越低。此外,效率也随产气量的增加而降低。为了评估行业标准动态多相流模拟器计算的正确性,在物理模拟器上采用有限体积法进行了验证计算,结果显示趋势相同,但绝对值不同。它还可以评估几何因素对流动分布的影响,这是非平稳多相流模拟器无法做到的。除此之外,得出的结论是,含水储层位于井眼下部较低的位置是优选的,因为此时对产量的影响小于位于含气层段上方的位置。将井布置图改为u型井对其运行动态影响不大。该研究以实际油田为例,有助于回答ESP井眼的使用效率问题,以及钻穿含气和含水油藏的影响程度问题,并为其他油田提供了进行此类评估的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency Survey of a Drainage Wellbore and Well Placement in Gas Fields
The paper describes the assessment process of methods for the construction and operation of gas wells with a large water-gas ratio. One of the ways to tackle the issue of poor performance of high WGR wells is to drill a drainage wellbore with an ESP to lift accumulating water. In addition, various configurations of well placement through gas-bearing and water-bearing reservoirs have been considered. To evaluate the efficiency of a drainage wellbore with an ESP installed for lifting water that comes from the main, productive, wellbore, industry-recognized non-stationary dynamic multiphase flow simulator was used, as well as a more refined tool, such as the physical simulator based on the finite volume method (computational fluid dynamics, CFD). A non-stationary dynamic simulator was also used to assess the impact of well placement through gas- and water-bearings reservoirs. Well data, fluid data, physical parameters were entered into the models and, by varying the input parameters, dependencies and results were obtained, allowing to draw a conclusion about the efficiency of each method, as well as about the software capabilities and limitations. The applicability and technical efficiency of an additional drainage borehole with an ESP tto ensure stable operation / high productivity of the well strongly depend on the value of the water-gas ratio, the higher it is, the lower the efficiency of the method. In addition, efficiency also decreases with increasing gas rate. To assess the correctness of the calculation made with dynamic multiphase flow simulator, which is the industry standard, a verification calculation was also carried out on a physical simulator using the finite volume method, which shows the same trends, but with different absolute values. It also made it possible to assess the influence of the geometry factor on the distribution of flows, which could not be done by the non-stationary multiphase flow simulator. Apart from this, it was concluded that the location of a water-bearing reservoir in the last lower part of the wellbore is preferable, since then the impact on production is less than when it is located above the gas-bearing interval. Changing the well layout to a U-shaped one affects the dynamics of its operation insignificantly. The study helps to answer the question about the efficiency of using a borehole with an ESP and about the degree of influence of drilling through gas- and water-bearing reservoirs using the example of a real field, as well as it presents the method of conducting such an assessment for other fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信