基于四维数字人体幻影的肺癌立体定向放射治疗靶标匹配精度研究

Jing Cai, K. Turner, Xiao Liang, WPaul Segars, ChrisR Kelsey, D. Yoo, L. Ren, F. Yin
{"title":"基于四维数字人体幻影的肺癌立体定向放射治疗靶标匹配精度研究","authors":"Jing Cai, K. Turner, Xiao Liang, WPaul Segars, ChrisR Kelsey, D. Yoo, L. Ren, F. Yin","doi":"10.4103/2395-3977.184313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate the effect of irregular respiratory on target-matching accuracy in lung stereotactic-body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: The four-dimensional extended cardiac torso (4D-XCAT) phantom was used to generate 4D computed tomography (4DCT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. Images were generated for 1 regular and 10 irregular trajectories, and for 3 tumor size groups (1, 2, and 3 cm). Image registrations between CBCT and average intensity projection (AIP) images of 4DCT were performed based on target volume matching. Error of registration was determined as the difference between manual CBCT-to-AIP registration and known registration between the two. In addition, internal target volumes (ITVs) were contoured on and compared between AIP, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and CBCT. Results: Small inter-observer variations of registration were found: 0.2, 0.3, and 0.7 mm in the medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) direction, respectively. Small errors of registration (median ≤ 0.5 mm) were found in all three directions for the regular respiratory profile. For the irregular profiles and on average of all tumor size groups, the median ± standard deviation (SD) errors of registration were 0.5 ± 0.3 mm, 0.4 ± 0.5 mm, and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm in the ML, AP, and SI direction, respectively. Significant differences were found between MIP and CBCT-based ITV volumes for the three tumor size groups (P = 0.011, 0.010, and 0.006 for 1, 2, and 3 cm tumor size group, respectively). Conclusion: Irregular breathing can induce error in CBCT-to-AIP registration in lung SBRT. This error increases as the breathing irregularity increases.","PeriodicalId":9428,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Translational Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"65 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target-Matching Accuracy in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Lung Cancer: An Investigation Based on Four-Dimensional Digital Human Phantom\",\"authors\":\"Jing Cai, K. Turner, Xiao Liang, WPaul Segars, ChrisR Kelsey, D. Yoo, L. Ren, F. Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2395-3977.184313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To investigate the effect of irregular respiratory on target-matching accuracy in lung stereotactic-body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: The four-dimensional extended cardiac torso (4D-XCAT) phantom was used to generate 4D computed tomography (4DCT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. Images were generated for 1 regular and 10 irregular trajectories, and for 3 tumor size groups (1, 2, and 3 cm). Image registrations between CBCT and average intensity projection (AIP) images of 4DCT were performed based on target volume matching. Error of registration was determined as the difference between manual CBCT-to-AIP registration and known registration between the two. In addition, internal target volumes (ITVs) were contoured on and compared between AIP, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and CBCT. Results: Small inter-observer variations of registration were found: 0.2, 0.3, and 0.7 mm in the medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) direction, respectively. Small errors of registration (median ≤ 0.5 mm) were found in all three directions for the regular respiratory profile. For the irregular profiles and on average of all tumor size groups, the median ± standard deviation (SD) errors of registration were 0.5 ± 0.3 mm, 0.4 ± 0.5 mm, and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm in the ML, AP, and SI direction, respectively. Significant differences were found between MIP and CBCT-based ITV volumes for the three tumor size groups (P = 0.011, 0.010, and 0.006 for 1, 2, and 3 cm tumor size group, respectively). Conclusion: Irregular breathing can induce error in CBCT-to-AIP registration in lung SBRT. This error increases as the breathing irregularity increases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Translational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Translational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-3977.184313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-3977.184313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:探讨不规则呼吸对肺立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)靶匹配准确性的影响。方法:利用四维扩展心脏躯干(4D- xcat)幻像生成四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)和锥束CT (CBCT)图像。生成1个规则轨迹和10个不规则轨迹的图像,以及3个肿瘤大小组(1、2和3 cm)。基于目标体积匹配实现了CBCT与4DCT平均强度投影(AIP)图像的配准。配准误差确定为手工CBCT-to-AIP配准与两者之间已知配准的差值。此外,在AIP、最大强度投影(MIP)和CBCT之间绘制内部靶体积(ITVs)的轮廓并进行比较。结果:观察者间的配准差异较小:内侧外侧(ML)、前后(AP)和上下(SI)方向分别为0.2、0.3和0.7 mm。在所有三个方向上,常规呼吸谱的配准误差都很小(中位数≤0.5 mm)。对于不规则轮廓和所有肿瘤大小组的平均值,在ML、AP和SI方向上的中位±标准差(SD)误差分别为0.5±0.3 mm、0.4±0.5 mm和1.9±1.6 mm。在三个肿瘤大小组中,MIP和基于cbct的ITV体积之间存在显著差异(1、2和3 cm肿瘤大小组分别P = 0.011、0.010和0.006)。结论:呼吸不规律可导致肺SBRT CBCT-to-AIP登记错误。这种误差随着呼吸不规律的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target-Matching Accuracy in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Lung Cancer: An Investigation Based on Four-Dimensional Digital Human Phantom
Aim: To investigate the effect of irregular respiratory on target-matching accuracy in lung stereotactic-body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: The four-dimensional extended cardiac torso (4D-XCAT) phantom was used to generate 4D computed tomography (4DCT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. Images were generated for 1 regular and 10 irregular trajectories, and for 3 tumor size groups (1, 2, and 3 cm). Image registrations between CBCT and average intensity projection (AIP) images of 4DCT were performed based on target volume matching. Error of registration was determined as the difference between manual CBCT-to-AIP registration and known registration between the two. In addition, internal target volumes (ITVs) were contoured on and compared between AIP, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and CBCT. Results: Small inter-observer variations of registration were found: 0.2, 0.3, and 0.7 mm in the medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) direction, respectively. Small errors of registration (median ≤ 0.5 mm) were found in all three directions for the regular respiratory profile. For the irregular profiles and on average of all tumor size groups, the median ± standard deviation (SD) errors of registration were 0.5 ± 0.3 mm, 0.4 ± 0.5 mm, and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm in the ML, AP, and SI direction, respectively. Significant differences were found between MIP and CBCT-based ITV volumes for the three tumor size groups (P = 0.011, 0.010, and 0.006 for 1, 2, and 3 cm tumor size group, respectively). Conclusion: Irregular breathing can induce error in CBCT-to-AIP registration in lung SBRT. This error increases as the breathing irregularity increases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信