{"title":"增程式电动汽车最优能量管理模型预测控制与距离约束自适应并发动态规划算法比较","authors":"A. Kalia, B. Fabien","doi":"10.1115/1.4050884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Intelligent energy management of hybrid electric vehicles is feasible with a priori information of route and driving conditions. Model predictive control (MPC) with finite horizon road grade preview has been proposed as a viable predictive energy management approach. We propose that our novel distance constrained-adaptive concurrent dynamic programming (DC-ACDP) approach can provide better energy management than MPC without any road grade information in context of an extended range electric vehicle (EREV). In this article, we have evaluated and compared the MPC and DC-ACDP energy management strategies for a real-world driving scenario. The simulations were conducted for a 160 km drive with road grade variation between +4% and –1%. Results show that the DC-ACDP approach is near-optimal and improves overall energy consumption by a maximum of 4.25%, in comparison to the simple MPC with a finite horizon road grade preview implementation. Additionally, a higher value for energy storage system state of charge (SOC) tracking penalty p2 results in the net energy consumption for MPC to converge toward that of DC-ACDP. A combination of the MPC and DC-ACDP approach is also evaluated with only 1.25% maximum improvement over simple MPC.","PeriodicalId":54846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Distance Constrained-Adaptive Concurrent Dynamic Programming Algorithms for Extended Range Electric Vehicle Optimal Energy Management\",\"authors\":\"A. Kalia, B. Fabien\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4050884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Intelligent energy management of hybrid electric vehicles is feasible with a priori information of route and driving conditions. Model predictive control (MPC) with finite horizon road grade preview has been proposed as a viable predictive energy management approach. We propose that our novel distance constrained-adaptive concurrent dynamic programming (DC-ACDP) approach can provide better energy management than MPC without any road grade information in context of an extended range electric vehicle (EREV). In this article, we have evaluated and compared the MPC and DC-ACDP energy management strategies for a real-world driving scenario. The simulations were conducted for a 160 km drive with road grade variation between +4% and –1%. Results show that the DC-ACDP approach is near-optimal and improves overall energy consumption by a maximum of 4.25%, in comparison to the simple MPC with a finite horizon road grade preview implementation. Additionally, a higher value for energy storage system state of charge (SOC) tracking penalty p2 results in the net energy consumption for MPC to converge toward that of DC-ACDP. A combination of the MPC and DC-ACDP approach is also evaluated with only 1.25% maximum improvement over simple MPC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050884\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Distance Constrained-Adaptive Concurrent Dynamic Programming Algorithms for Extended Range Electric Vehicle Optimal Energy Management
Intelligent energy management of hybrid electric vehicles is feasible with a priori information of route and driving conditions. Model predictive control (MPC) with finite horizon road grade preview has been proposed as a viable predictive energy management approach. We propose that our novel distance constrained-adaptive concurrent dynamic programming (DC-ACDP) approach can provide better energy management than MPC without any road grade information in context of an extended range electric vehicle (EREV). In this article, we have evaluated and compared the MPC and DC-ACDP energy management strategies for a real-world driving scenario. The simulations were conducted for a 160 km drive with road grade variation between +4% and –1%. Results show that the DC-ACDP approach is near-optimal and improves overall energy consumption by a maximum of 4.25%, in comparison to the simple MPC with a finite horizon road grade preview implementation. Additionally, a higher value for energy storage system state of charge (SOC) tracking penalty p2 results in the net energy consumption for MPC to converge toward that of DC-ACDP. A combination of the MPC and DC-ACDP approach is also evaluated with only 1.25% maximum improvement over simple MPC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control publishes theoretical and applied original papers in the traditional areas implied by its name, as well as papers in interdisciplinary areas. Theoretical papers should present new theoretical developments and knowledge for controls of dynamical systems together with clear engineering motivation for the new theory. New theory or results that are only of mathematical interest without a clear engineering motivation or have a cursory relevance only are discouraged. "Application" is understood to include modeling, simulation of realistic systems, and corroboration of theory with emphasis on demonstrated practicality.