机器人动作成功的人类观察者脑电图信号签名:用深度卷积神经网络解码和可视化

Joos Behncke, R. Schirrmeister, Wolfram Burgard, T. Ball
{"title":"机器人动作成功的人类观察者脑电图信号签名:用深度卷积神经网络解码和可视化","authors":"Joos Behncke, R. Schirrmeister, Wolfram Burgard, T. Ball","doi":"10.1109/IWW-BCI.2018.8311531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of robotic assistive devices grows in our work and everyday life. Cooperative scenarios involving both robots and humans require safe human-robot interaction. One important aspect here is the management of robot errors, including fast and accurate online robot-error detection and correction. Analysis of brain signals from a human interacting with a robot may help identifying robot errors, but accuracies of such analyses have still substantial space for improvement. In this paper we evaluate whether a novel framework based on deep convolutional neural networks (deep ConvNets) could improve the accuracy of decoding robot errors from the EEG of a human observer, both during an object grasping and a pouring task. We show that deep ConvNets reached significantly higher accuracies than both regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis (rLDA) and filter bank common spatial patterns (FB-CSP) combined with rLDA, both widely used EEG classifiers. Deep ConvNets reached mean accuracies of 75% ± 9 %, rLDA 65% ± 10% and FB-CSP + rLDA 63% ± 6% for decoding of erroneous vs. correct trials. Visualization of the time-domain EEG features learned by the ConvNets to decode errors revealed spatiotemporal patterns that reflected differences between the two experimental paradigms. Across subjects, ConvNet decoding accuracies were significantly correlated with those obtained with rLDA, but not CSP, indicating that in the present context ConvNets behaved more “rLDA-like” (but consistently better), while in a previous decoding study with another task but the same ConvNet architecture, it was found to behave more “CSP-like”. Our findings thus provide further support for the assumption that deep ConvNets are a versatile addition to the existing toolbox of EEG decoding techniques, and we discuss steps how ConvNet EEG decoding performance could be further optimized.","PeriodicalId":6537,"journal":{"name":"2018 6th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)","volume":"114 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The signature of robot action success in EEG signals of a human observer: Decoding and visualization using deep convolutional neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Joos Behncke, R. Schirrmeister, Wolfram Burgard, T. Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWW-BCI.2018.8311531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of robotic assistive devices grows in our work and everyday life. Cooperative scenarios involving both robots and humans require safe human-robot interaction. One important aspect here is the management of robot errors, including fast and accurate online robot-error detection and correction. Analysis of brain signals from a human interacting with a robot may help identifying robot errors, but accuracies of such analyses have still substantial space for improvement. In this paper we evaluate whether a novel framework based on deep convolutional neural networks (deep ConvNets) could improve the accuracy of decoding robot errors from the EEG of a human observer, both during an object grasping and a pouring task. We show that deep ConvNets reached significantly higher accuracies than both regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis (rLDA) and filter bank common spatial patterns (FB-CSP) combined with rLDA, both widely used EEG classifiers. Deep ConvNets reached mean accuracies of 75% ± 9 %, rLDA 65% ± 10% and FB-CSP + rLDA 63% ± 6% for decoding of erroneous vs. correct trials. Visualization of the time-domain EEG features learned by the ConvNets to decode errors revealed spatiotemporal patterns that reflected differences between the two experimental paradigms. Across subjects, ConvNet decoding accuracies were significantly correlated with those obtained with rLDA, but not CSP, indicating that in the present context ConvNets behaved more “rLDA-like” (but consistently better), while in a previous decoding study with another task but the same ConvNet architecture, it was found to behave more “CSP-like”. Our findings thus provide further support for the assumption that deep ConvNets are a versatile addition to the existing toolbox of EEG decoding techniques, and we discuss steps how ConvNet EEG decoding performance could be further optimized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 6th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 6th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWW-BCI.2018.8311531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 6th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWW-BCI.2018.8311531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

机器人辅助设备在我们的工作和日常生活中越来越重要。涉及机器人和人类的协作场景需要安全的人机交互。这里的一个重要方面是机器人错误的管理,包括快速和准确的在线机器人错误检测和纠正。分析人类与机器人互动的大脑信号可能有助于识别机器人的错误,但这种分析的准确性仍有很大的提高空间。在本文中,我们评估了一种基于深度卷积神经网络(deep ConvNets)的新框架是否可以提高从人类观察者的脑电图中解码机器人错误的准确性,无论是在物体抓取过程中还是在倾注任务中。研究表明,深度卷积神经网络的准确率明显高于正则化线性判别分析(rLDA)和与rLDA相结合的滤波器组共同空间模式(FB-CSP),这两种分类器都是广泛使用的脑电分类器。深度卷积神经网络解码错误与正确试验的平均准确率为75%±9%,rLDA为65%±10%,FB-CSP + rLDA为63%±6%。通过卷积神经网络学习到的EEG时域特征的可视化,揭示了反映两种实验范式差异的时空模式。在所有受试者中,ConvNet解码精度与使用rLDA获得的精度显著相关,但与CSP无关,这表明在目前的情况下,ConvNet表现得更“类似于rLDA”(但始终更好),而在之前的解码研究中,使用另一个任务,但相同的ConvNet架构,发现它的行为更“类似于CSP”。因此,我们的研究结果进一步支持了深度卷积神经网络是现有脑电图解码技术工具箱的一个多功能补充的假设,我们讨论了如何进一步优化卷积神经网络脑电图解码性能的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The signature of robot action success in EEG signals of a human observer: Decoding and visualization using deep convolutional neural networks
The importance of robotic assistive devices grows in our work and everyday life. Cooperative scenarios involving both robots and humans require safe human-robot interaction. One important aspect here is the management of robot errors, including fast and accurate online robot-error detection and correction. Analysis of brain signals from a human interacting with a robot may help identifying robot errors, but accuracies of such analyses have still substantial space for improvement. In this paper we evaluate whether a novel framework based on deep convolutional neural networks (deep ConvNets) could improve the accuracy of decoding robot errors from the EEG of a human observer, both during an object grasping and a pouring task. We show that deep ConvNets reached significantly higher accuracies than both regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis (rLDA) and filter bank common spatial patterns (FB-CSP) combined with rLDA, both widely used EEG classifiers. Deep ConvNets reached mean accuracies of 75% ± 9 %, rLDA 65% ± 10% and FB-CSP + rLDA 63% ± 6% for decoding of erroneous vs. correct trials. Visualization of the time-domain EEG features learned by the ConvNets to decode errors revealed spatiotemporal patterns that reflected differences between the two experimental paradigms. Across subjects, ConvNet decoding accuracies were significantly correlated with those obtained with rLDA, but not CSP, indicating that in the present context ConvNets behaved more “rLDA-like” (but consistently better), while in a previous decoding study with another task but the same ConvNet architecture, it was found to behave more “CSP-like”. Our findings thus provide further support for the assumption that deep ConvNets are a versatile addition to the existing toolbox of EEG decoding techniques, and we discuss steps how ConvNet EEG decoding performance could be further optimized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信