玻璃纤维作为一种新型建筑材料:一个试验房屋的生命周期评估

Stavroula Bjånesøy, J. Heinonen, Ólafur Ögmundarson, Áróra Árnadóttir, B. Marteinsson
{"title":"玻璃纤维作为一种新型建筑材料:一个试验房屋的生命周期评估","authors":"Stavroula Bjånesøy, J. Heinonen, Ólafur Ögmundarson, Áróra Árnadóttir, B. Marteinsson","doi":"10.3390/architecture2040037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative building materials have the potential to reduce environmental pressure from buildings, though the use of these materials should be guided by an understanding of the embodied environmental impacts. Extensive research on embodied greenhouse gas emissions from buildings has been conducted, but other impacts are less frequently reported. Furthermore, uncertainty is rarely reported in building LCA studies. This paper provides a piece for filling those gaps by comprehensively reporting the embodied environmental impacts of a fiberglass house within the LCA framework, modeled in the OpenLCA software using the Ecoinvent 3.7.1 inventory database. The ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method is used to report a wide range of environmental impacts. The global warming potential is calculated to be 311 kgCO2 eq/m2. Additionally, a hotspot analysis is included to identify areas that should be the focus for improvement, as well as an uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo. The embodied emissions are given context by a scenario analysis over a 50-year use phase in three different grid conditions and with two different energy efficiency levels. Based on the results of this study, it is determined that fiberglass does not provide a viable alternative to conventional building materials if the purpose is to reduce embodied emissions from buildings.","PeriodicalId":79561,"journal":{"name":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiberglass as a Novel Building Material: A Life Cycle Assessment of a Pilot House\",\"authors\":\"Stavroula Bjånesøy, J. Heinonen, Ólafur Ögmundarson, Áróra Árnadóttir, B. Marteinsson\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/architecture2040037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alternative building materials have the potential to reduce environmental pressure from buildings, though the use of these materials should be guided by an understanding of the embodied environmental impacts. Extensive research on embodied greenhouse gas emissions from buildings has been conducted, but other impacts are less frequently reported. Furthermore, uncertainty is rarely reported in building LCA studies. This paper provides a piece for filling those gaps by comprehensively reporting the embodied environmental impacts of a fiberglass house within the LCA framework, modeled in the OpenLCA software using the Ecoinvent 3.7.1 inventory database. The ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method is used to report a wide range of environmental impacts. The global warming potential is calculated to be 311 kgCO2 eq/m2. Additionally, a hotspot analysis is included to identify areas that should be the focus for improvement, as well as an uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo. The embodied emissions are given context by a scenario analysis over a 50-year use phase in three different grid conditions and with two different energy efficiency levels. Based on the results of this study, it is determined that fiberglass does not provide a viable alternative to conventional building materials if the purpose is to reduce embodied emissions from buildings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2040037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2040037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

替代建筑材料有可能减少建筑物对环境造成的压力,但这些材料的使用应以对具体环境影响的理解为指导。对建筑中隐含的温室气体排放进行了广泛的研究,但其他影响很少被报道。此外,在构建LCA研究中,不确定性很少被报道。本文通过全面报告LCA框架内玻璃纤维房屋的具体环境影响,在OpenLCA软件中使用Ecoinvent 3.7.1库存数据库进行建模,为填补这些空白提供了一篇文章。ReCiPe 2016影响评估方法用于报告广泛的环境影响。全球变暖潜势计算为311 kgCO2当量/m2。此外,还包括热点分析,以确定应该重点改进的领域,以及基于蒙特卡罗的不确定性分析。在三种不同的电网条件和两种不同的能源效率水平下,通过对50年使用阶段的情景分析,给出了具体排放量的背景。根据这项研究的结果,可以确定的是,如果目的是减少建筑物的隐含排放,玻璃纤维不能提供传统建筑材料的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fiberglass as a Novel Building Material: A Life Cycle Assessment of a Pilot House
Alternative building materials have the potential to reduce environmental pressure from buildings, though the use of these materials should be guided by an understanding of the embodied environmental impacts. Extensive research on embodied greenhouse gas emissions from buildings has been conducted, but other impacts are less frequently reported. Furthermore, uncertainty is rarely reported in building LCA studies. This paper provides a piece for filling those gaps by comprehensively reporting the embodied environmental impacts of a fiberglass house within the LCA framework, modeled in the OpenLCA software using the Ecoinvent 3.7.1 inventory database. The ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method is used to report a wide range of environmental impacts. The global warming potential is calculated to be 311 kgCO2 eq/m2. Additionally, a hotspot analysis is included to identify areas that should be the focus for improvement, as well as an uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo. The embodied emissions are given context by a scenario analysis over a 50-year use phase in three different grid conditions and with two different energy efficiency levels. Based on the results of this study, it is determined that fiberglass does not provide a viable alternative to conventional building materials if the purpose is to reduce embodied emissions from buildings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信