与贸易有关的知识产权、药品专利和获得基本药物:从西雅图到多哈还有很长的路要走。

{"title":"与贸易有关的知识产权、药品专利和获得基本药物:从西雅图到多哈还有很长的路要走。","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9781315254227-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. INTRODUCTION Infectious diseases kill over 10 million people each year, more than 90 percent of whom are in the developing world.1 The leading causes of illness and death in Africa, Asia, and South America-regions that account for four-fifths of the world's population-are HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, malaria, and tuberculosis. In particular, the magnitude of the AIDS crisis has drawn attention to the fact that millions of people in the developing world do not have access to the medicines that are needed to treat disease or alleviate suffering. Each day, close to eight thousand people die of AIDS in the developing world.2 The reasons for the lack of access to essential medicines are manifold, but in many cases the high prices of drugs are a barrier to needed treatments. Prohibitive drug prices are often the result of strong intellectual property protection. Governments in developing countries that attempt to bring the price of medicines down have come under pressure from industrialized countries and the multinational pharmaceutical industry. The World Trade Organization (\"WTO\") Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (\"TRIPS\" or \"Agreement\"), which sets out the minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property, including patents for pharmaceuticals, has come under fierce criticism because of the effects that increased levels of patent protection will have on drug prices. While TRIPS does offer safeguards to remedy negative effects of patent protection or patent abuse, in practice it is unclear whether and how countries can make use of these safeguards when patents increasingly present barriers to medicine access. The Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference, held in 2001 in Doha, Qatar, adopted a Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health (\"Doha Declaration\" or \"Declaration\") which affirmed the sovereign right of governments to take measures to protect public health. Public health advocates welcomed the Doha Declaration as an important achievement because it gave primacy to public health over private intellectual property, and clarified WTO Members' rights to use TRIPS safeguards. Although the Doha Declaration broke new ground in guaranteeing Members' access to medical products, it did not solve all of the problems associated with intellectual property protection and public health. II. THE ACCESS PROBLEM AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY A number of new medicines that are vital for the survival of millions are already too costly for the vast majority of people in poor countries. In addition, investment in research and development (\"R&D\") towards the health needs of people in developing countries has almost come to a standstill. Developing countries, where three-quarters of the world population lives, account for less than 10 percent of the global pharmaceutical market. The implementation of TRIPS is expected to have a further upward effect on drug prices, while increased R&D investment, despite higher levels of intellectual property protection, is not expected.3 One-third of the world population lacks access to the most basic essential drugs and, in the poorest parts of Africa and Asia, this figure climbs to one-half Access to treatment for diseases in developing countries is problematic either because the medicines are unaffordable, have become ineffective due to resistance, or are not sufficiently adapted to specific local conditions and constraints. Many factors contribute to the problem of limited access to essential medicines. Unavailability can be caused by logistical supply and storage problems, substandard drug quality, inappropriate selection of drugs, wasteful prescription and inappropriate use, inadequate production, and prohibitive prices. Despite the enormous burden of disease, drug discovery and development targeted at infectious and parasitic diseases in poor countries has virtually ground to a standstill because drug companies in developed and developing nations simply cannot recoup the cost of R&D for products to treat diseases that abound in developing countries. …","PeriodicalId":87172,"journal":{"name":"Chicago journal of international law","volume":"72 1","pages":"27-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRIPS, pharmaceutical patents, and access to essential medicines: a long way from Seattle to Doha.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315254227-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I. INTRODUCTION Infectious diseases kill over 10 million people each year, more than 90 percent of whom are in the developing world.1 The leading causes of illness and death in Africa, Asia, and South America-regions that account for four-fifths of the world's population-are HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, malaria, and tuberculosis. In particular, the magnitude of the AIDS crisis has drawn attention to the fact that millions of people in the developing world do not have access to the medicines that are needed to treat disease or alleviate suffering. Each day, close to eight thousand people die of AIDS in the developing world.2 The reasons for the lack of access to essential medicines are manifold, but in many cases the high prices of drugs are a barrier to needed treatments. Prohibitive drug prices are often the result of strong intellectual property protection. Governments in developing countries that attempt to bring the price of medicines down have come under pressure from industrialized countries and the multinational pharmaceutical industry. The World Trade Organization (\\\"WTO\\\") Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (\\\"TRIPS\\\" or \\\"Agreement\\\"), which sets out the minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property, including patents for pharmaceuticals, has come under fierce criticism because of the effects that increased levels of patent protection will have on drug prices. While TRIPS does offer safeguards to remedy negative effects of patent protection or patent abuse, in practice it is unclear whether and how countries can make use of these safeguards when patents increasingly present barriers to medicine access. The Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference, held in 2001 in Doha, Qatar, adopted a Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health (\\\"Doha Declaration\\\" or \\\"Declaration\\\") which affirmed the sovereign right of governments to take measures to protect public health. Public health advocates welcomed the Doha Declaration as an important achievement because it gave primacy to public health over private intellectual property, and clarified WTO Members' rights to use TRIPS safeguards. Although the Doha Declaration broke new ground in guaranteeing Members' access to medical products, it did not solve all of the problems associated with intellectual property protection and public health. II. THE ACCESS PROBLEM AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY A number of new medicines that are vital for the survival of millions are already too costly for the vast majority of people in poor countries. In addition, investment in research and development (\\\"R&D\\\") towards the health needs of people in developing countries has almost come to a standstill. Developing countries, where three-quarters of the world population lives, account for less than 10 percent of the global pharmaceutical market. The implementation of TRIPS is expected to have a further upward effect on drug prices, while increased R&D investment, despite higher levels of intellectual property protection, is not expected.3 One-third of the world population lacks access to the most basic essential drugs and, in the poorest parts of Africa and Asia, this figure climbs to one-half Access to treatment for diseases in developing countries is problematic either because the medicines are unaffordable, have become ineffective due to resistance, or are not sufficiently adapted to specific local conditions and constraints. Many factors contribute to the problem of limited access to essential medicines. Unavailability can be caused by logistical supply and storage problems, substandard drug quality, inappropriate selection of drugs, wasteful prescription and inappropriate use, inadequate production, and prohibitive prices. Despite the enormous burden of disease, drug discovery and development targeted at infectious and parasitic diseases in poor countries has virtually ground to a standstill because drug companies in developed and developing nations simply cannot recoup the cost of R&D for products to treat diseases that abound in developing countries. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":87172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chicago journal of international law\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"27-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chicago journal of international law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254227-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago journal of international law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254227-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

摘要

传染病每年夺去1000多万人的生命,其中90%以上生活在发展中国家在占世界人口五分之四的非洲、亚洲和南美洲,导致疾病和死亡的主要原因是艾滋病毒/艾滋病、呼吸道感染、疟疾和结核病。特别是,艾滋病危机的严重程度使人们注意到这样一个事实,即发展中世界数百万人无法获得治疗疾病或减轻痛苦所需的药品。在发展中国家,每天有近8000人死于艾滋病缺乏获得基本药物的原因是多方面的,但在许多情况下,高昂的药物价格是获得所需治疗的障碍。高昂的药价往往是强有力的知识产权保护的结果。试图降低药品价格的发展中国家政府受到了来自工业化国家和跨国制药业的压力。世界贸易组织(“WTO”)的《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(“TRIPS”或“协定”)规定了保护知识产权(包括药品专利)的最低标准,由于提高专利保护水平将对药品价格产生影响,该协定受到了激烈的批评。虽然《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》确实提供了补救专利保护或专利滥用的负面影响的保障措施,但在实践中,尚不清楚当专利日益成为获取药品的障碍时,各国是否以及如何利用这些保障措施。2001年在卡塔尔多哈举行的世贸组织第四次部长级会议通过了《与贸易有关的知识产权问题与公共健康宣言》(“多哈宣言”或“宣言”),申明各国政府有采取措施保护公共健康的主权权利。公共卫生倡导者欢迎《多哈宣言》,认为它是一项重要成就,因为它将公共卫生置于私人知识产权之上,并澄清了世贸组织成员使用与贸易有关的知识产权保障措施的权利。虽然《多哈宣言》在保障成员获得医疗产品方面开辟了新天地,但它并没有解决与知识产权保护和公共卫生有关的所有问题。2获取问题和知识产权一些对数百万人的生存至关重要的新药对于贫穷国家的绝大多数人来说已经太昂贵了。此外,为满足发展中国家人民的健康需求而进行的研究与开发投资几乎已经停滞不前。占世界人口四分之三的发展中国家在全球医药市场的份额不到10%。与贸易有关的知识产权协定的实施预计将进一步提高药品价格,而研发投资的增加,尽管知识产权保护水平提高,预计不会增加世界人口的三分之一无法获得最基本的基本药物,而在非洲和亚洲最贫穷的地区,这一数字上升到一半。在发展中国家,获得疾病治疗存在问题,要么是因为这些药物负担不起,要么因为耐药性而变得无效,要么是因为没有充分适应当地的具体条件和限制。许多因素造成获得基本药物的机会有限的问题。无法获得可由以下因素造成:后勤供应和储存问题、药品质量不合格、药品选择不当、处方浪费和使用不当、生产不足以及价格过高。尽管疾病带来了巨大的负担,但针对贫穷国家传染病和寄生虫病的药物发现和开发实际上已经陷入停滞,因为发达国家和发展中国家的制药公司根本无法收回用于治疗发展中国家大量疾病的产品的研发成本。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TRIPS, pharmaceutical patents, and access to essential medicines: a long way from Seattle to Doha.
I. INTRODUCTION Infectious diseases kill over 10 million people each year, more than 90 percent of whom are in the developing world.1 The leading causes of illness and death in Africa, Asia, and South America-regions that account for four-fifths of the world's population-are HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, malaria, and tuberculosis. In particular, the magnitude of the AIDS crisis has drawn attention to the fact that millions of people in the developing world do not have access to the medicines that are needed to treat disease or alleviate suffering. Each day, close to eight thousand people die of AIDS in the developing world.2 The reasons for the lack of access to essential medicines are manifold, but in many cases the high prices of drugs are a barrier to needed treatments. Prohibitive drug prices are often the result of strong intellectual property protection. Governments in developing countries that attempt to bring the price of medicines down have come under pressure from industrialized countries and the multinational pharmaceutical industry. The World Trade Organization ("WTO") Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement ("TRIPS" or "Agreement"), which sets out the minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property, including patents for pharmaceuticals, has come under fierce criticism because of the effects that increased levels of patent protection will have on drug prices. While TRIPS does offer safeguards to remedy negative effects of patent protection or patent abuse, in practice it is unclear whether and how countries can make use of these safeguards when patents increasingly present barriers to medicine access. The Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference, held in 2001 in Doha, Qatar, adopted a Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health ("Doha Declaration" or "Declaration") which affirmed the sovereign right of governments to take measures to protect public health. Public health advocates welcomed the Doha Declaration as an important achievement because it gave primacy to public health over private intellectual property, and clarified WTO Members' rights to use TRIPS safeguards. Although the Doha Declaration broke new ground in guaranteeing Members' access to medical products, it did not solve all of the problems associated with intellectual property protection and public health. II. THE ACCESS PROBLEM AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY A number of new medicines that are vital for the survival of millions are already too costly for the vast majority of people in poor countries. In addition, investment in research and development ("R&D") towards the health needs of people in developing countries has almost come to a standstill. Developing countries, where three-quarters of the world population lives, account for less than 10 percent of the global pharmaceutical market. The implementation of TRIPS is expected to have a further upward effect on drug prices, while increased R&D investment, despite higher levels of intellectual property protection, is not expected.3 One-third of the world population lacks access to the most basic essential drugs and, in the poorest parts of Africa and Asia, this figure climbs to one-half Access to treatment for diseases in developing countries is problematic either because the medicines are unaffordable, have become ineffective due to resistance, or are not sufficiently adapted to specific local conditions and constraints. Many factors contribute to the problem of limited access to essential medicines. Unavailability can be caused by logistical supply and storage problems, substandard drug quality, inappropriate selection of drugs, wasteful prescription and inappropriate use, inadequate production, and prohibitive prices. Despite the enormous burden of disease, drug discovery and development targeted at infectious and parasitic diseases in poor countries has virtually ground to a standstill because drug companies in developed and developing nations simply cannot recoup the cost of R&D for products to treat diseases that abound in developing countries. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信