通知投票:企业拯救vs清算决定

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
W. Rosslyn-Smith, Nicole Varela Aguiar De Abreu
{"title":"通知投票:企业拯救vs清算决定","authors":"W. Rosslyn-Smith, Nicole Varela Aguiar De Abreu","doi":"10.25159/1998-8125/8564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-unitary insolvency systems require an initial choice between liquidation and rehabilitation. For those systems, the decision to further support rehabilitation is often reinforced by the estimate of a lesser return in liquidation. The creditors’ decision to either accept or reject the business rescue plan depends substantially on comparing the proposed liquidation value with the business rescue value that is mandated in the business rescue plan.\nPurpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the proposed liquidation value with the actual liquidation value of firms that had commenced business rescue proceedings but were subsequently liquidated. This study is exploratory; therefore, our aim is to use the findings of this study to derive future research opportunities for scholars to explore.\nMethodology: This research adopted a content analysis research approach by collecting documents such as business rescue plans and liquidation accounts, which are qualitative in nature, and describing these documents through quantitative data analysis.\nFindings: The study revealed that for the secured creditors’ sample, there was a significant difference between the proposed liquidation value and the actual liquidation value. For the unsecured creditors’ sample, this study found no significant difference between the proposed liquidation value and actual liquidation value.\nLimitations: The major limitation of this study was access to data; therefore, the huge decline in the actual sample size in comparison to the expected sample size.\nValue: To the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study comparing the proposed liquidation value to the actual liquidation value in order to determine whether differences exist. As a result, this study tackles a novel perspective on one of the influences that can affect the vote. This may be of particular importance to creditors, who may find the results of this study to be useful. Lastly, the findings of this study derived future research opportunities for scholars to explore.","PeriodicalId":44582,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing the Vote: The Business Rescue vs Liquidation Decision\",\"authors\":\"W. Rosslyn-Smith, Nicole Varela Aguiar De Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/1998-8125/8564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Non-unitary insolvency systems require an initial choice between liquidation and rehabilitation. For those systems, the decision to further support rehabilitation is often reinforced by the estimate of a lesser return in liquidation. The creditors’ decision to either accept or reject the business rescue plan depends substantially on comparing the proposed liquidation value with the business rescue value that is mandated in the business rescue plan.\\nPurpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the proposed liquidation value with the actual liquidation value of firms that had commenced business rescue proceedings but were subsequently liquidated. This study is exploratory; therefore, our aim is to use the findings of this study to derive future research opportunities for scholars to explore.\\nMethodology: This research adopted a content analysis research approach by collecting documents such as business rescue plans and liquidation accounts, which are qualitative in nature, and describing these documents through quantitative data analysis.\\nFindings: The study revealed that for the secured creditors’ sample, there was a significant difference between the proposed liquidation value and the actual liquidation value. For the unsecured creditors’ sample, this study found no significant difference between the proposed liquidation value and actual liquidation value.\\nLimitations: The major limitation of this study was access to data; therefore, the huge decline in the actual sample size in comparison to the expected sample size.\\nValue: To the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study comparing the proposed liquidation value to the actual liquidation value in order to determine whether differences exist. As a result, this study tackles a novel perspective on one of the influences that can affect the vote. This may be of particular importance to creditors, who may find the results of this study to be useful. Lastly, the findings of this study derived future research opportunities for scholars to explore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/8564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/8564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非单一破产制度要求在清算和恢复之间进行初步选择。对于这些系统来说,进一步支持重建的决定往往因为估计清算的回报较少而得到加强。债权人接受或拒绝企业救助计划的决定在很大程度上取决于将提议的清算价值与企业救助计划中规定的企业救助价值进行比较。目的:本研究的目的是比较提议的清算价值与实际清算价值的公司,已启动商业救援程序,但随后被清算。本研究是探索性的;因此,我们的目的是利用本研究的发现,得出未来的研究机会,供学者探索。研究方法:本研究采用内容分析研究方法,收集定性性质的企业救援计划、清算决算等文件,并通过定量数据分析对这些文件进行描述。研究发现:对于有担保债权人样本,建议清算价值与实际清算价值之间存在显著差异。对于无担保债权人样本,本研究发现建议清算价值与实际清算价值之间没有显著差异。局限性:本研究的主要局限性在于数据的可及性;因此,实际样本量与预期样本量相比大幅度下降。价值:据研究者所知,这是第一次将提出的清算价值与实际清算价值进行比较,以确定是否存在差异的研究。因此,这项研究从一个新的角度来看待可能影响投票的因素之一。这可能对债权人特别重要,因为他们可能会发现这项研究的结果是有用的。最后,本研究的发现为未来的研究提供了可供学者探索的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing the Vote: The Business Rescue vs Liquidation Decision
Background: Non-unitary insolvency systems require an initial choice between liquidation and rehabilitation. For those systems, the decision to further support rehabilitation is often reinforced by the estimate of a lesser return in liquidation. The creditors’ decision to either accept or reject the business rescue plan depends substantially on comparing the proposed liquidation value with the business rescue value that is mandated in the business rescue plan. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the proposed liquidation value with the actual liquidation value of firms that had commenced business rescue proceedings but were subsequently liquidated. This study is exploratory; therefore, our aim is to use the findings of this study to derive future research opportunities for scholars to explore. Methodology: This research adopted a content analysis research approach by collecting documents such as business rescue plans and liquidation accounts, which are qualitative in nature, and describing these documents through quantitative data analysis. Findings: The study revealed that for the secured creditors’ sample, there was a significant difference between the proposed liquidation value and the actual liquidation value. For the unsecured creditors’ sample, this study found no significant difference between the proposed liquidation value and actual liquidation value. Limitations: The major limitation of this study was access to data; therefore, the huge decline in the actual sample size in comparison to the expected sample size. Value: To the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study comparing the proposed liquidation value to the actual liquidation value in order to determine whether differences exist. As a result, this study tackles a novel perspective on one of the influences that can affect the vote. This may be of particular importance to creditors, who may find the results of this study to be useful. Lastly, the findings of this study derived future research opportunities for scholars to explore.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信