慢性腰痛的临床表现和分类:印度东部1000名门诊患者的横断面分析

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sanatan Behera, Tanmoy Mohanty, Chitrita Behera
{"title":"慢性腰痛的临床表现和分类:印度东部1000名门诊患者的横断面分析","authors":"Sanatan Behera, Tanmoy Mohanty, Chitrita Behera","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/63367.18273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common presenting symptom among patients seeking medical help, accounting for approximately 85% of the cases. It affects individuals of all age groups and genders. Predominantly back pain is non specific, lacking identifiable patho-anatomy, while a lesser-known type, specific low back pain, demonstrates identifiable aetiology and pathology. This poses a challenge for physicians, as they must not only determine the underlying cause but also formulate categorical treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Aim: To assess the prevalence of different types of CLBP based on clinical examination, past history, age, and gender in the overall population of the study. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, from August 2019 to July 2021. A total of 1,640 patients were examined in the orthopedics outpatient department, of which 1,000 patients aged between 20 and 60 years, with back pain lasting three months, were included in the study. All patients underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including history and physical examination. The final type of CLBP was determined based on the predominant symptom. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software. Results: The male-to-female ratio was 1.23:1, and the average age was 43.1 years. The most common type of CLBP was neuropathic (n=473, 47.3%), followed by discogenic CLBP (n=255, 25.5%). The least common type was coccydynia (n=4, 0.4%). Facetogenic CLBP had the highest average age of presentation (57.3 years), while postural CLBP had the lowest average age (29.6 years). Conclusion: Neuropathic CLBP was the most common type, followed by discogenic CLBP, with sacroiliitis and coccydynia being less common. Detailed clinical evaluation aids in classifying different types of CLBP, which can help avoid unnecessary investigations, except for the neuropathic type and, to some extent, instability CLBP.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"18 86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Presentation and Categorisation of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-sectional Analysis of 1000 Outpatients in Eastern India\",\"authors\":\"Sanatan Behera, Tanmoy Mohanty, Chitrita Behera\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/jcdr/2023/63367.18273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common presenting symptom among patients seeking medical help, accounting for approximately 85% of the cases. It affects individuals of all age groups and genders. Predominantly back pain is non specific, lacking identifiable patho-anatomy, while a lesser-known type, specific low back pain, demonstrates identifiable aetiology and pathology. This poses a challenge for physicians, as they must not only determine the underlying cause but also formulate categorical treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Aim: To assess the prevalence of different types of CLBP based on clinical examination, past history, age, and gender in the overall population of the study. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, from August 2019 to July 2021. A total of 1,640 patients were examined in the orthopedics outpatient department, of which 1,000 patients aged between 20 and 60 years, with back pain lasting three months, were included in the study. All patients underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including history and physical examination. The final type of CLBP was determined based on the predominant symptom. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software. Results: The male-to-female ratio was 1.23:1, and the average age was 43.1 years. The most common type of CLBP was neuropathic (n=473, 47.3%), followed by discogenic CLBP (n=255, 25.5%). The least common type was coccydynia (n=4, 0.4%). Facetogenic CLBP had the highest average age of presentation (57.3 years), while postural CLBP had the lowest average age (29.6 years). Conclusion: Neuropathic CLBP was the most common type, followed by discogenic CLBP, with sacroiliitis and coccydynia being less common. Detailed clinical evaluation aids in classifying different types of CLBP, which can help avoid unnecessary investigations, except for the neuropathic type and, to some extent, instability CLBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"18 86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/63367.18273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/63367.18273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腰痛是寻求医疗帮助的患者中最常见的症状之一,约占85%的病例。它影响所有年龄组和性别的人。背部疼痛主要是非特异性的,缺乏可识别的病理解剖结构,而一种鲜为人知的类型,特异性腰痛,具有可识别的病因和病理。这对医生提出了挑战,因为他们不仅要确定潜在的原因,还要制定慢性腰痛(CLBP)的分类治疗方法。目的:评估基于临床检查、既往史、年龄和性别的不同类型CLBP在研究总体人群中的患病率。材料和方法:2019年8月至2021年7月在印度奥里萨邦布巴内斯瓦尔的卡林加医学科学研究所(KIMS)进行了一项横断面研究。在骨科门诊共检查了1640名患者,其中1000名年龄在20至60岁之间,背痛持续三个月的患者被纳入研究。所有患者均接受详细的临床评估,包括病史和体格检查。根据主要症状确定最终的CLBP类型。采用Microsoft Excel软件进行数据分析。结果:男女比例为1.23:1,平均年龄43.1岁。最常见的CLBP类型是神经性CLBP (n=473, 47.3%),其次是椎间盘源性CLBP (n=255, 25.5%)。最不常见的类型是尾骨痛(n=4, 0.4%)。面源性CLBP的平均发病年龄最高(57.3岁),而体位性CLBP的平均发病年龄最低(29.6岁)。结论:神经性CLBP最常见,其次为椎间盘源性CLBP,骶髂炎和尾骨痛较少见。详细的临床评估有助于对不同类型的CLBP进行分类,避免不必要的检查,但神经性CLBP和不稳定性CLBP在一定程度上除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Presentation and Categorisation of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-sectional Analysis of 1000 Outpatients in Eastern India
Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common presenting symptom among patients seeking medical help, accounting for approximately 85% of the cases. It affects individuals of all age groups and genders. Predominantly back pain is non specific, lacking identifiable patho-anatomy, while a lesser-known type, specific low back pain, demonstrates identifiable aetiology and pathology. This poses a challenge for physicians, as they must not only determine the underlying cause but also formulate categorical treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Aim: To assess the prevalence of different types of CLBP based on clinical examination, past history, age, and gender in the overall population of the study. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, from August 2019 to July 2021. A total of 1,640 patients were examined in the orthopedics outpatient department, of which 1,000 patients aged between 20 and 60 years, with back pain lasting three months, were included in the study. All patients underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including history and physical examination. The final type of CLBP was determined based on the predominant symptom. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software. Results: The male-to-female ratio was 1.23:1, and the average age was 43.1 years. The most common type of CLBP was neuropathic (n=473, 47.3%), followed by discogenic CLBP (n=255, 25.5%). The least common type was coccydynia (n=4, 0.4%). Facetogenic CLBP had the highest average age of presentation (57.3 years), while postural CLBP had the lowest average age (29.6 years). Conclusion: Neuropathic CLBP was the most common type, followed by discogenic CLBP, with sacroiliitis and coccydynia being less common. Detailed clinical evaluation aids in classifying different types of CLBP, which can help avoid unnecessary investigations, except for the neuropathic type and, to some extent, instability CLBP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信