法特瓦的政治:现代印尼的伊斯兰法律权威

Q4 Computer Science
Jeremy Menchik
{"title":"法特瓦的政治:现代印尼的伊斯兰法律权威","authors":"Jeremy Menchik","doi":"10.1353/ind.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Fatwas from Islamic organizations are prominent elements of public debates in democratic Indonesia, as well as the broader Muslim world. Yet scholars lack a clear theoretical explanation for the power of fatwas in politics. This paper draws on original archival material to explicate the legal authority of the fatwas from the Indonesian Council of Ulama (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI), which over the past twenty years has become one of the country's most influential actors. The paper distinguishes three periods in the growth and transformation of MUI; starting with charismatic authority and state corporatism, MUI later gained formal regulatory authority, and then authority through agenda setting, lobbying, mass mobilization, and the threat of violence. In light of the changing nature of MUI's power and the concomitantly changing authority of its fatwas, the paper argues that contemporary fatwas contain no innate authority, nor do they have any inherent effects. Classical theories of Islamic law, Max Weber's typology, and ethical theories of fatwas cannot explain MUI's growing power or its modes of authority. To understand MUI's growing power, it is necessary to look beyond these traditional modes of Islamic legal authority to modern organizational forms and their attendant strategies for exerting social control. In the modern age, Islamic legal authority reflects the dominant logic of political authority in society.","PeriodicalId":41794,"journal":{"name":"Internetworking Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politics of the Fatwa: Islamic Legal Authority in Modern Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Menchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ind.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Fatwas from Islamic organizations are prominent elements of public debates in democratic Indonesia, as well as the broader Muslim world. Yet scholars lack a clear theoretical explanation for the power of fatwas in politics. This paper draws on original archival material to explicate the legal authority of the fatwas from the Indonesian Council of Ulama (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI), which over the past twenty years has become one of the country's most influential actors. The paper distinguishes three periods in the growth and transformation of MUI; starting with charismatic authority and state corporatism, MUI later gained formal regulatory authority, and then authority through agenda setting, lobbying, mass mobilization, and the threat of violence. In light of the changing nature of MUI's power and the concomitantly changing authority of its fatwas, the paper argues that contemporary fatwas contain no innate authority, nor do they have any inherent effects. Classical theories of Islamic law, Max Weber's typology, and ethical theories of fatwas cannot explain MUI's growing power or its modes of authority. To understand MUI's growing power, it is necessary to look beyond these traditional modes of Islamic legal authority to modern organizational forms and their attendant strategies for exerting social control. In the modern age, Islamic legal authority reflects the dominant logic of political authority in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internetworking Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internetworking Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ind.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internetworking Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ind.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:来自伊斯兰组织的法特瓦是民主印尼以及更广泛的穆斯林世界公开辩论的重要因素。然而,学者们对伊斯兰教令在政治中的影响力缺乏清晰的理论解释。本文利用原始档案材料来解释印尼乌拉玛委员会(Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI)的法特瓦的法律权威,该委员会在过去二十年中已成为该国最具影响力的行动者之一。本文划分了MUI成长和转型的三个阶段;MUI从魅力型权威和国家社团主义开始,后来获得了正式的监管权威,然后通过议程设置、游说、群众动员和暴力威胁获得了权威。鉴于伊斯兰教团权力性质的变化及其教法权威的变化,本文认为当代伊斯兰教法不包含固有的权威,也不具有任何内在的影响。伊斯兰教法的经典理论、马克斯·韦伯的类型学和伊斯兰教法的伦理理论都无法解释伊斯兰教团日益增长的权力或其权威模式。要理解MUI日益增长的力量,有必要超越伊斯兰法律权威的这些传统模式,看看现代组织形式及其伴随的实施社会控制的策略。在现代,伊斯兰法律权威体现了政治权威在社会中的主导逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Politics of the Fatwa: Islamic Legal Authority in Modern Indonesia
Abstract:Fatwas from Islamic organizations are prominent elements of public debates in democratic Indonesia, as well as the broader Muslim world. Yet scholars lack a clear theoretical explanation for the power of fatwas in politics. This paper draws on original archival material to explicate the legal authority of the fatwas from the Indonesian Council of Ulama (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI), which over the past twenty years has become one of the country's most influential actors. The paper distinguishes three periods in the growth and transformation of MUI; starting with charismatic authority and state corporatism, MUI later gained formal regulatory authority, and then authority through agenda setting, lobbying, mass mobilization, and the threat of violence. In light of the changing nature of MUI's power and the concomitantly changing authority of its fatwas, the paper argues that contemporary fatwas contain no innate authority, nor do they have any inherent effects. Classical theories of Islamic law, Max Weber's typology, and ethical theories of fatwas cannot explain MUI's growing power or its modes of authority. To understand MUI's growing power, it is necessary to look beyond these traditional modes of Islamic legal authority to modern organizational forms and their attendant strategies for exerting social control. In the modern age, Islamic legal authority reflects the dominant logic of political authority in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internetworking Indonesia
Internetworking Indonesia COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信